Just in time for a day that pays homage to nightmares, national or otherwise. (h/t Glenn Reynolds)

Here. In the United States of America. Sure, fine. But they have the right motives for their fascist behavior, namely, the Greater Good. And if individual Americans continue to presume they are free to break from the goodliness of the community and express their own thoughts, in direct defiance of the wishes of the benevolent State, should they not be called out for such a deliberate attempt at undermining the

But then, that’s only a problem because the great unwashed don’t know what’s best for them.  That’s Obama‘s job. No, really. It’s right there in the Constitution — or at least, it would be, were the old racist thing not such a flawed document, written by withered white men who knew little about sacrifice or creating a sense of community.  

Avik Roy, Forbes: Obamacare’s disruption of the existing health insurance market—a disruption codified in law, and known to the administration—is only just beginning. And it’s far broader than recent media coverage has implied. […] If you read the Affordable Care Act when it was passed, you knew that it was dishonest for President Obama to claim that “if you like your plan, you can keep your plan,” as he did—and

Which, if you think about it, makes sense: low-skill Mexicans coming across the border are going to wreck the environment with their panting CO2 omissions whether they’re here or not. So. May as well keep them closer to home, where they can at least perhaps be rehabilitated. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised to hear the GOP use this as part of their argument for pushing comprehensive immigration reform —

What’s left to say, really? The Left has learned that, in a mainstream media environment owned by its pro-big government attendants and progressive guards, no lie is big enough that it can’t be massaged into a “half truth” or “narrowly true” statement by some motivated political hack bent on protecting a given narrative. Call it Terminator 5: Rise of the Anti-Foundationalists. That this is possible because we, as a society,

Dear Rep Lewis, While we in the TEA Party movement — that is, those Americans who stand and fight for constitutional principles, the sovereignty of the individual, and the epistemology of the Enlightenment — appreciate your timely reminder of the Democratic Party’s past involvements in segregation and the brutal subjugation of parts of the citizenry, we would like to correct your latest attempt to tie our efforts at resisting the

It is clear — and yes, I’m willing to debate any person from the right’s opinion complex — that DC is invested in DC solely, that the federal government, and both parties who comprise it (with few very obvious exceptions:  the GOP establishment, for example, will simply not back conservative candidates, even though it is conservative lawmakers, and those running for such positions, who are working overtly and unapologetically to

Are we allowed to believe any of this? Or does merely even bringing it to light as an historical fact constitute proof our “extremism” — the kind that the feds have now determined make us far more dangerous than those who crash our planes into buildings and seek, by their own organizational admission, to take down the West? I ask because I care.  And of course, because I’m racist.

Jonah Goldberg takes on the true believers who, now that the ends have justified the means and the lies Obama and the Dems sold us created “settled law”, are “puzzled” by Republicans’ refusal to “engage in policy debate” — as if the GOP was given a chance to do so to begin with, having been shut out of any discussion of ObamaCare.  Writes Goldberg: Ross Douthat is right when he tweets: “Furor