And by “we,” I mean those of us who were sickened by the elder Paul’s foreign policy ideas?  Because the son doesn’t sound too terribly much like the father. It’s important to remember that the establishment backed a moderate KY attorney general over Paul in the GOP primaries.  And now they’re seeking to redefine conservatism and pretend that, pushing for the nomination of Bush /Christie or Rubio, is akin to

And people thought I was joking 9-year ago when I predicted that, if we followed the governmental and regulatory trajectory we were on, we’d soon find ourselves having to do mandatory morning exercises in order to justify our (now “free”) health care.  The Hill (h/t Mark Levin): The Obama administration proposed regulations Friday that would prohibit U.S. schools from selling unhealthy snacks. The 160-page regulation from the Department of Agriculture

With Christie or Rubio as his running mate, if I had to guess. And why not?  I mean, it’s not like if you put your ear to the ground and listen attentively you can’t here the slow, steadily-building swell for yet another Bush in the White House — particularly when we finally have the right one this time, a man not tainted with a Reagan connection, one not responsible for

Andy McCarthy, who claims to know a thing or two about the Muslim Brotherhood, seems displeased.  Which is odd, given that I’ve read bloggers praising the strategery of such a masterful willingness to arm the Brotherhood in order to, you know, really keep an eye on them and have a say in what they do going forward.  Having essentially put them into power in the first place.  Presumably to keep

From a commenter on the Denver Post write up:  “Just as well. He would only get an imaginary education at a place like this…” My own thoughts, which I put on Twitter this morning, come down to this:  Evidently, to those Loveland apparatchiks with degrees in education, the world isn’t worth saving if, in order to save it, one most resort to something so gauche as tossing imaginary grenades at

This David Horowitz essay was forwarded along to me by several readers, presumably because in it, Horowitz deals quite a bit with adjusting the messaging that goes along with conservative policy to match and or/ counter the left’s decided rhetorical advantages — namely, the belief, expressed overwhelmingly in exit polls, that the Democrats care about people, while the Republicans, whatever their other virtues (such as they are) do not.  Horowitz