Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

January 2013
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Archives

January 25, 2013

“The State shall take, the State shall give”: the Marxist subtext of gun control

David Mamet, on liberty and gun control.  Happily, he hits many of the same points I’ve hit over the past several weeks — which I note as “happily” because it makes me feel smart and urbane to be on the side of the estimable Mr Mamet.  That, and it suggests that somewhere down the road I might be able to write a really cool screenplay about some elaborate con, and

Hillary: What difference does it make?

Asked and answered, sweetie.   h/t geoff B

This is what fascism looks like

You’ll note that it can come in a suit and wear hair gel just as easily as it can show up wearing a big mustache and military fatigues then pose on a balcony opening onto a public square.  Politico, “Rahm Emanuel presses banks on guns”: Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, moving to take a lead role in the gun control debate, is turning up the pressure on banks that do business

“Gen. Dempsey: If Women Can’t Meet Military Standard, Pentagon Will Ask ‘Does It Really Have to Be That High?’”

Of course.  Because you can’t have “equality” until you have homogeneity.  And to reach that you need social engineers and political masterminds to set up a system whereby that is encouraged and enforced — regardless of the ancillary effects, which in this case has to do with something so trivial as creating the best conditions for combat effectiveness and military victory. CNS News: Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the

a note on guns

  Here’s what I’ll tell Sen Feinstein and all the Democrats and Republicans who support any cosmetic bans on weaponry or any bans on my capacity to carry ammunition useful to that weaponry:  if you disarm us, I and millions like me will make it our mission to bring you down to the same level. Because all you are is a servant of the People.  Which position doesn’t place you

“Obama recess appointments unconstitutional, court”

Washington Times: In a case freighted with major constitutional implications, a federal appeals court on Friday overturned President Obama’s controversial recess appointments from last year, ruling he abused his powers and acted when the Senate was not actually in a recess. The three-judge panel’s ruling is a major blow to Mr. Obama. The judges ruled that the appointments Mr. Obama made to the National Labor Relations Board are illegal, and