Well, that’s what he said in so many words. Pardon me for sounding all Visigothy, Mssrs. Moran and Frum, et al., but it sure does seem to me that Obama is telling the Russians — in a message he wants passed along to Putin — that, once he’s re-elected, he can drop all facades and surrender the US strategic nuclear advantage. Killing off Reaganism, as so many of his university-era
March 27, 2012
“Administration Admits to Court: Under Obamacare, Select Group Can Get Health Care, Not Pay for It, Not Buy Insurance, Not Pay Penalty”
In other words, free riders continue to ride free! — Or, in other other words, the putative (though always disingenuous) reason for ObamaCare is not fixed by ObamaCare. CNS: President Barack Obama has justified the mandate in his health-care law that requires individuals to buy health insurance by arguing that it will eliminate free riders—that is, people who get health care (often from emergency rooms) but, lacking insurance, never pay
“Trayvon Martin Parents To Testify in Congress”
Let’s see: they weren’t witnesses to the shooting. Nor is the shooting a national matter. And besides, this is supposedly an “ongoing investigation” (though the police in FL seem to think they were correct in how they handled the case). So why in the world would Trayvon Martin’s parents be testifying before Congress? — mock or no mock? Oh, right: Fast and Furious ended up arming Mexican drug cartels and
“Is conservatism inimical to liberty?”
Nik0lai Wenzel, Wallace and Marion Reemelin Chair in Free-Market Economics at Hillsdale College and Visiting Assistant Professor of Economics in the Lutgert College of Business at Florida Gulf Coast University, says it is. Many “conservatives” will not recognize themselves completely in my critique. This is largely because there are so many “conservatisms.” I argue that each involves assertions of private preferences through public means–and that the imposition, in each case,
