Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

May 2010
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Archives

May 26, 2010

“5 reasons why ‘Son of Stimulus’ is a bad seed”

James Pethokoukis, Reuters. — To which protein wisdom, had he authored the piece, would have added a sixth reason: “Because blow me.” But then, he’s never been one for exercising editorial discretion.

"5 reasons why 'Son of Stimulus' is a bad seed"

James Pethokoukis, Reuters. — To which protein wisdom, had he authored the piece, would have added a sixth reason: “Because blow me.” But then, he’s never been one for exercising editorial discretion.

“Big Labor’s Payoff”

IBD: Unions: Those who give to politicians expect a lot in return. That’s clear from the budget-busting payoffs directed largely at organized labor by Democrats in Congress and the White House. A bill making its way through the Senate would bail out union pension funds to the tune of $165 billion. The bill’s author, Democratic Sen. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, wants the public to pay for the gold-plated union retirement

"Big Labor's Payoff"

IBD: Unions: Those who give to politicians expect a lot in return. That’s clear from the budget-busting payoffs directed largely at organized labor by Democrats in Congress and the White House. A bill making its way through the Senate would bail out union pension funds to the tune of $165 billion. The bill’s author, Democratic Sen. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, wants the public to pay for the gold-plated union retirement

“The Subjects of the Constitution”

Nick Rosenkranz, Stanford Law Review: Two centuries after Marbury v. Madison, there remains a deep confusion about quite what a court is reviewing when it engages in judicial review. Conventional wisdom has it that judicial review is the review of certain legal objects: statutes, regulations. But strictly speaking, this is not quite right. The Constitution prohibits not objects but actions. Judicial review is the review of such actions. And actions

"The Subjects of the Constitution"

Nick Rosenkranz, Stanford Law Review: Two centuries after Marbury v. Madison, there remains a deep confusion about quite what a court is reviewing when it engages in judicial review. Conventional wisdom has it that judicial review is the review of certain legal objects: statutes, regulations. But strictly speaking, this is not quite right. The Constitution prohibits not objects but actions. Judicial review is the review of such actions. And actions