Over at Crooks and Liars, Nicole Belle deplores the slaying of Unitarians, of which she is one, due, apparently, to the pernicious influence of hatemongers such as O’Reilly, Hannity and Savage. I can’t recall her heartache at the slaying of Roman Catholic nuns in the wake of the cartoons controversy, but perhaps I simply don’t recall. I do agree with her that the usher who took the blast and the
July 2008
He Said, She Said [Dan Collins, with Tab Lloyd]
La Malkin posts today on The Brangelina-fication of the Obamas, a couple days after Karl did.
What Barack Obama did not tell his students [Karl]
More interesting than Jodi Kantor’s fluffy New York Times article on Barack Obama’s stint as a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School is her accompanying Caucus blog post, which includes a number of the exams and answer memos he prepared. The legal analyses would probably be a bit of a slog for the non-lawyer (and the paper has solicited reax from a range of professors to be published today),
Oh, NOW I Get It [Dan Collins; UPDATE]
Why do liberals police their comments sections so illiberally? Because authorial intent is most manifest in the reader’s marginalia. I guess he also thinks this post was hugely umbrageous. I think he must have mistaken me for teh Gleenses. The reason he wishes to represent my post so is because it demonstrates how his calm, cool, collected detachment from the follies of conservatives drives them mad (do you hear me? mad! I
Barack Obama did not endorse reparations [Karl]
The Honolulu Star-Bulletin, reporting on Barack Obama’s speech plus Q&A session with cheering minority journalists, lifted the following quote from the candidate: “I consistently believe that when it comes to whether it’s Native Americans or African-American issues or reparations, the most important thing for the U.S. government to do is not just offer words, but offer deeds.” A HotAir headline asked whether this was an endorsement of reparations. A look
I Crave a Boon [Dan Collins]
First, I’m fond of dicentra, so despite my crankiness, leave that alone, please. I guarantee we will work it out. Second, Jeff is trying to discover the proprietor of No More Mister Nice Blog, who wishes him a painful malignancy. Since he’s coming east, let’s see whether we can’t arrange a tete a tete, so they can work things out mano a mano. Any help appreciated.
This Turd Was Thrown [Dan Collins]
I once had a gull, Or should I say He once had me? TBogg (a somewhat stupid blogger) thinks it’s “cute” that I go beyond intentionalism in my view of the coverage of the Adkisson slayings in Tennessee. What’s interesting about his interpretation, from my point of view, is that he seems to believe that there was a text in the argument that is authoritative. Just having gotten back from
Obama superdelegate (and fmr spiritual advisor) plans Chicago school boycott [Karl]
The Rev. James Meeks, in a protest over inequalities in school funding, is not only asking Chicago public school students to skip their first day of classes, but also is asking parents to attempt to enroll their children in wealthier, white, suburban schools. Rev. Meeks has targeted suburban New Trier High School, one of the inspirations for the movie The Breakfast Club, whose alumni include everyone from Donald Rumsfeld and Rahm Emanuel
Major John reports from the International Zone [Karl]
You know… the “Puzzle Palace.” The “Head Shed.” Swimmin’ pools… movie stars. Speaking of which, when the Major joined Jeff G and I for lunch, I had no idea he was a fan of one of my Dad’s favorite movies. If you have seen it, you know the exact sound I am making in my head at the moment. (h/t Instapundit.)
The “Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) is indicted” post [Karl]
BREAKING, via McClatchy: Sen. Ted Stevens, the longest-serving Republican in the U.S. Senate and one of the chamber’s most powerful members, was indicted Tuesday in Washington for failing to disclose more than $250,000 worth of gifts that he received from businessmen who were seeking his help on federal issues and projects. That he is charged with false statements, as opposed to more substantive corruption charges, is a bit disappointing. Indeed,
