Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

“Obama’s Contraceptive Disinformation”

Stacy McCain:

This issue isn’t about employers imposing anything on anybody. It’s about whether the federal government can mandate certain types of insurance coverage for private employers, even to the point of requiring Catholic organizations to pay for insurance that includes full coverage — no deductible, no co-pay — for contraception, sterilization and abortifacient “morning after” drugs.

In this battle, the defense of Catholic organizations is actually a libertarian position, and the only people who could possibly take the side of the Obama administration are . . . well, crazy people, or perhaps well-meaning people who have been deliberately misinformed about the issue.

And just where may such “perhaps well-meaning people who have been deliberately misinformed about the issue” be getting their information?

Why, the mainstream press!

Who, if we don’t make the case has begun in many cases actively working to usher in a progressive democratic socialist remake of the US, will by dint of its purported “objectivity” or “neutrality,” continue to act as an effective propaganda arm for the activist left.

Those in the New Left have spent years entrenching themselves in the information dissemination and academic fields, as well as in the Democratic Party. Is it really so hard to believe that, having worked tirelessly and with cynical political purpose to take over those institutions, they might actually have a plan for how they’d hoped to use their positioning, should they ever achieve a perfect storm of power? That is, that people like Bill Ayers, or Ms Piven, or a host of other Obama mentors who were born of that revolutionary leftist mindset and never renounced it, would have strategies and blueprints for the kind of “fundamental transformation” of the US they have spent their adult lives promoting and then, they hope, ruling over?

Or is that just more Visigothic crazy talk from the cranks and conspiracy nuts who won’t admit that Obama is just an ordinary Democrat doing ordinary Dem Party things, and that the reason he drives us so crazy is because he’s a strong, educated Black man?

Stacy is correct — and this is a point we here at pw have been beating consistently since the announcement of the original, pre-“compromise” HHS dictate: this is certainly an attack on religious freedom and the First Amendment, but even moreso, it is a power grab by the federal government, who now believes it has the authority to dictate to private companies what they must sell, and for how much they must sell it.

Too, and by extension, they now believe that you as the consumer be mandated to pay for things you don’t want — and that may violate your freedom of conscience — even though they’ve tried to hide that piece of the puzzle by labeling the services as “free”.

The fact is, the services and contraceptive devices have to be paid for, and that cost will be factored in to the overall costs of coverage. Meaning, you will be paying for all the free things whether you want to or not.

To me, it matters not whether “most Catholics” favor the mandate. Most Catholics vote Democrat, too — and they’re just as wrong for doing that.

This is not a Catholic issue, or even a strictly religious issue. This is about individual sovereignty, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the fundamental relationship between the State and the individual being forcibly altered such that we are no longer a government of and by the people, but rather subjects who must petition the State for our “rights,” and who the State can mandate engage in economic behavior that we cannot opt out of, be we a private business or a private citizen.

It is the trick of the Left to try to turn this into a battle in the culture wars. It is, but that is only the facet of the fight they wish to focus on.

It’s ideological prestidigitation. And those idiots who are sending out warnings that to oppose the government on this is to free up, say, Muslim employers to impose Sharia law on their employees, would do well to understand that this is not about employers imposing anything — after all, the Catholic Church, as employer, is not mandating that their employees not use birth control, or that they go to church, or that they carry a rosary, or that they love the baby Jesus; instead, it is about a central authority’s push to overthrow the constraints of the Constitution and Declaration and “fundamentally transform” the US by way of a coup against the very foundation of American exceptionalism: individual sovereignty, a limited government of enumerated powers, and natural rights that cannot be taken away by government.

(thanks to JD)

9 Replies to ““Obama’s Contraceptive Disinformation””

  1. Squid says:

    Yeah, that Sharia argument is so silly that I can barely contain my condescension when I tear the ignorant advocate a new one.

  2. Jeff G. says:

    Ironically, Squid, if you want to get the people making that particular argument really upset (as opposed to pitched in faux indignation), let them know that what this does is allows the government, in theory, to mandate that fundamentalist Islamic employers not allow prayer breaks. Or the stoning of gays.

    We’ve attacked their Otherness with our vicious and presumptive Occidentalism!

  3. Crawford says:

    It allows the government to mandate eating pork. It allows the government to mandate EVERYTHING.

  4. Squid says:

    Yup. For as much as they’d like to paint it in terms of the State and the Church colluding to keep the poor put-upon wimminz from gettin’ their freak on, it really has nothing to do with that. Fortunately, the “argument” is so transparently false that even the thickest of my acquaintances haven’t had any choice but to capitulate.

  5. iron308 says:

    Looking at this from a tactical political perspective, I wonder if this policy was announced now to rile up the baby killer base against the possibility of Santorum being the eventual Republican nominee. Much like OWS seemed to be aimed at Romney. I wonder if they expected the push back they are getting? Or did they think this would just energize their base.

    Don’t get me wrong, I fear the left is so far ahead of us (or the R’s) in their strategic thinking and have no trouble believing that they are fully cognizant of all the implications outlined by Jeff and others of forcing contraception down the catholic church’s throat. But part of me wants to hope that they are just smarter than the bumbling RINO’s and not this near irresistible force they seem to be. The latter is quite the despairing thought.

  6. LBascom says:

    Whether anyone wants to call it such, much less recognize it as different from what has been attempted before, we are living through a soft civil war right now.

    I don’t even know I should call it such, as it perhaps bares more resemblance to a coup. Whatever the label, Obama promised that’s what his goal was for crying out loud!

    “Fundamentally transform America”.

    Obama is blatantly using powers expressly denied by the Constitution, in an attempt to be some sort of Supreme Leader in a post natural rights, post capitalist, post free, post sovereign America. The rest of the establishment watch in wonder, and dream of such power for themselves.

    We, the people, the grateful inheritors of the founding fathers creation, watch in horror and buy ammo.

    Don’t forget to vote.

  7. dicentra says:

    Or is that just more Visigothic crazy talk from the cranks and conspiracy nuts

    This.

    Given that only nut-jobs believe in Bilderbergers and Trutherism and JFK and Red Scare conspiracies, all allegations of collusion and planning and subversion are a priori false.

  8. […] we have a couple of things to look at. Jeff Goldstein is working very hard to keep the MSM from co-opting the narrative about the subject. This is not […]

  9. […] McCain and Jeff Goldstein yesterday, pointed out this is an issue of individual sovereignty, as Jeff Goldstein put it, the issue is about: …the fundamental relationship between the State and the individual being […]

Comments are closed.