Only this time, her serial avoidance was particularly nefarious inasmuch as she used a non-avoidance technique to give lie to the fact that she simply will not face the press — no matter how much she faces the press. Really, can we afford to have someone so uncommitted to her campaign’s avoidance strategy that she flouts her non-avoidance avoidance just a heartbeat away from the Presidency? From NJ’s Hotline: Sarah
a passing thought to act as an objective correlative for statesmenship
I loved the bit last night where Senator Obama gave as his excuse for continuing to campaign (instead of doing his job as Senator) that a President has to be able to do several things at once. I don’t think the Senator recognized the irony. Or was aware that he isn’t yet President. — Though that last bit was just a bonus, really.
“the yin and yang of intimate interpersonal relationships, 36†(from the protein wisdom conceptual series)
yin: “Y’know, I can remember when I used to come into a room and I could just tell you were genuinely happy to see me.” yang: “Uh huh. And I can remember when I used to come period. So can we just mourn later, and maybe heat up a meatloaf or something in the meantime…?”
The Englishman Who Went Up a Mole Hill But Came Down a Mountain
Britain continues its move toward soft totalitarianism — first by way of ludicrous mulitculturalist capitulation, then by way of the policing of its own benign vocabulary for hints of “hate” and any of a number of frowned-upon “-isms”: The use of terms like “Old Masters” and “seminal” by students and academics have been banned, because of claims that they are sexist. The British Sociological Association, whose members include dozens of
When is “choice” a dirty word
From the AP: Connecticut and 12 other states are protesting a proposed Bush administration rule that would give stronger job protections to doctors and other health care workers who refuse to participate in abortions because of religious or moral objections. The attorneys general of 13 states sent a letter Wednesday to the Department of Health and Human Services, protesting that the rule is too vague. The proposed rule would require
Media tries to will the US into the age of Obamalot
As I noted in an update last evening would almost certainly be the case, the media today is pushing the story that the firm owned by McCain’s campaign manager, Rick Davis, lobbied for Freddie and Fannie Mac — all while continuing to ignore exploring, at any length, Sen Barack Obama’s actual ties to those closely related to the current economic meltdown. Not only that, but the Davis-as-tied-to-crisis story is disputed
Greens beaned: “Democrats to let offshore drilling ban expire”
From the AP: Democrats have decided to allow a quarter-century ban on drilling for oil off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts to expire next week, conceding defeat in a months-long battle with the White House and Republicans set off by $4 a gallon gasoline prices this summer. […] Republicans have made lifting the ban a key campaign issue after gasoline prices spiked this summer and public opinion turned in favor
Hysteria, hyperbolized
Zoinks! If only some mole could infiltrate Governor Palin’s inner circle and convince her to dress more in earth tones, the republic as we know it — nay, democracy itself, and everything this country has come to stand for! — could be saved. But alas. This dumb tundra hick, this, this… Hooter’s hand puppet, has never even been to Milan, much less tried on shoes for which any self respecting
O!bama Doodles!
Like radicalism, only with a pleasing candy coating! Me, I’d call them “Alinsky Wafers,” but then, I’m all about giving credit where it’s due. And let’s face it, this Messiah business is starting to look like a real pressure filled job. From Stanley Kurtz: From 1995 to 1999, [Barack Obama] led an education foundation called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC), and remained on the board until 2001. The group poured
“The press discovers ‘unconscious racism'”
— And it’s in you, the white guy or gal who is not planning to vote for Obama. Okay, well maybe not you in this case: here, the target seems to be Democrats who may either cross over and vote for McCain or who will stay home rather than vote for a black man. Conservatives of all races are de facto racists, of course, and so can be comfortably excluded
