Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Archives

Cho’s Motives Decoded [Dan Collins]

Thanks to a story by Marc Fisher in the WaPo, I am able to state definitively why the VaTech shooter went on his rampage.

You may recall that among the significant details about Cho’s family that were revealed to us by the legacy media, we found that his family live in an off-white two-story house in the DC suburbs.  Further, we discovered that his parents own a dry-cleaning business and are of Korean rather than Chinese origin, but that nevertheless their son was inscrutable.

Now comes word that DC Administrative Law Judge Roy Pearson is suing a dry-cleaning establishment owned by Koreans for (place pinky beside lips in Dr. Evil fashion) 65 MILLION DOLLARS.  I put it you, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, that the implication that an attorney might somehow suffer 65 million dollars of pain and suffering for the accidental loss of a pair of trousers (he was offered 12k, but that didn’t come close) convinced Cho that the world was so saturated with woe that it was actually merciful to dispatch so many of his fellow students.

That’s my story.  What?  It’s ludicrous?  Well it makes a lot more sense than this asshole’s lawsuit.

27 Replies to “Cho’s Motives Decoded [Dan Collins]”

  1. Major John says:

    OK, it finally came to pass – a civil lawsuit that actually gob-smacks me.  And I have been a member of the IL bar since 1994…

    If I were the judge, I’d order him his pants back, now that they are found, and then I would wish him GOOD DAY, SIR!  That, or I would hit him over the head with my gavel.

  2. Dan Collins says:

    And as regards the harrassment and legal expenses the defendants have suffered, Major John?

  3. Mikey NTH says:

    I’m with Major John on this one.

    and Dan – the punishment for the harrassment inflicted is for the lawyer to be flung into the pit of the rabid weasels.

  4. Dan Collins says:

    I like the way you punish, Dante Mikey.

  5. Pablo says:

    Two lawyers and many legal bills later, the Chungs offered Pearson $3,000, then $4,600 and, finally, says their attorney, Chris Manning, $12,000 to settle the case.

    Boy, does that make my head hurt.

    I say we get Major John a spot on the bench and get him a full scale replica of Maxwell’s Silver Hammer.

  6. slackjawedyokel says:

    Why would that be punishment?  The guy obviously is a rabid weasel.

    I’d sentence him to 12-hour shifts 7 days a week running the pressing machine at the dry cleaner’s during the months of July and August.

  7. Rob Crawford says:

    that nevertheless their son was inscrutable

    At least he didn’t call him “articulate” or “nappy-headed”.

  8. Kirk says:

    So, why can an atty/judge pursue something this stupid for so long with no fear of punitive damages?  Are there no laws on frivilous lawsuits present in DC?

    Personally, I think John Edwards may have found himself a good running mate.

  9. PCachu says:

    The Silky-Trousers Pony?

  10. Mikey NTH says:

    You ever try to make billable hours off of a rabid weasel, SJY?

  11. Great Mencken's Ghost! says:

    Mikey—jaysus, bo’, why would you do that to weasels?

  12. furriskey says:

    If ‘this asshole’,

    DC Administrative Law Judge Roy Pearson

    , sues you for characterizing him as an ‘asshole’, Dan, I would humbly ask to be joined in the suit.

    Any publisher worth his salt would offer us up to $ several billion for our memoirs.

  13. Major John says:

    Sanctions would be appropriate – I think the judge has hinted at this when he used the “a” word (abuse).  Will be interesting to see what happens…

  14. J. Peden says:

    Thanks for brightening my day, too, Dan.

  15. Dan Collins says:

    Of course, furriskey!  Everyone who comments here will be named as a defendant.

  16. Lew Clark says:

    The only weakness in your argument is that Cho was an English major.  He must have read Shakespeare.  Yet, to the best of my knowledge, not one lawyer was killed in his rampage.  Wouldn’t he have had more success against his and his people’s tormentors if he had hit a convention of the Trial Lawyers Association?

  17. Slartibartfast says:

    Well, of course Pearson’s not going to take his pants back now.  They probably don’t fit anymore, and so he’s been deprived of pantal priveledge for the better part of a decade.

    Or however long it is pants are supposed to last, these days.

  18. Slartibartfast says:

    strike priveledge; replace with consortium.

  19. Major John says:

    pantal consortium – I’ll have to check a copy of Black’s Law Dictionary for that.  Say, if it isn’t in there, lets get Slart some credit for creating a new legal term!

  20. Power corrupts, and absolute power is even more of a boner-aid.

  21. Dan Collins says:

    Major John–

    The strange thing is, if he had the pants, he wouldn’t have had a suit.

  22. Blue Hen says:

    But he would still be able to claim out of pocket expenses.

  23. McGehee says:

    boner-aid

    Um, no thanks. I’ll just have water.

  24. Slartibartfast says:

    The strange thing is, if he had the pants, he wouldn’t have had a suit.

    That made me laugh out loud, thanks.

    On the other hand, I’m laughing out loud quite a lot today.  Going coast-to-coast (almost) and back in 24 hours (literally: left at 6am, got back at 6am) can tend to induce some wear and tear on the senses.

    Anyway, thanks, even if I don’t see the humor tomorrow.

  25. Known a Few Like Him says:

    Absolute fact – any man who threatens anyone with this much “firepower” and overreaction is compensating big time. He must have the world’s smallest penis. Like Guiness Book of World Records tiny. And every woman who knows him is thinking that and laughing behind his back or cracking jokes with his ex-wife if he’s got one.

    Guys like that are always underblessed and lousy lays.

  26. Noah Nehm says:

    Wouldn’t it be great if this were the case that led us to abolish the American rule?

  27. aNZu says:

    From looking at the symoblism in his manifesto, I believe that Cho thought he was slaying Lucifer.

Comments are closed.