In a SF Chronicle article about the reaction to Ann Coulter’s comment at CPAC, Wyatt Buchanan drops this little gem:
Conservative gay scholar Andrew Sullivan, who heard Coulter’s comments live, said she uttered it with “malice aforethought.” But equating it to other slurs is a difficult comparison, Sullivan said.
One out of three ain’t bad.
Sullivan a conservative? Come on. He’s a gay marriage freak; a gay “rights” freak; a gay agenda driven fake. Nothing matters to him but gay (fill in the blank). Stopped reading or linking to him two or more years ago.
St. Andrew-on-the-Cape is magic, don’t cha know. He can look into your heart and tell if you’re malicious or not.
And if his divinations happen to correlate with his political position vis-a-vis the person in question?
Just a coincidence.
Andrew positively trembles at the opportunity to wax weighty on those topics that reflect his obssession with all things gay and anti neo-con. What provides the intellectual mass for his pronouncements is the very instinctive nature of his conclusions, unencumbered by data or experience, merely polished gems of casual insight like a sailors nose for the impending storm.
Those of us lacking in Andrew’s special gift of divination and understanding are left to ponder the world with only realty to guide us.
PEASANTS!
reality
crap!
Wha…?
OK, henceforth I want to be known as “hazel-eyed, twentysomething sprite Jamie.” That’s fair, right?
And I hereby volunteer to be known as super-strong hyper-virile genius McGehee.
Which has more accuracy than the adjectives Buchanan applies to Sullivan…
ConservativeLiberal gayscholarbloviatorFixed it.
Spooky. That’s how I thought of you already.