- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 8
Search
Archive Calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |
Archives
Categories
- A Government That Can Force You to Buy Health Insurance Can Make You Do Anything (3)
- a protein wisdom philosophy primer (3)
- academics (25)
- armadillo (8)
- Friday Fiction 100 Word Challenge (51)
- from the protein wisdom conceptual series (136)
- identity politics (33)
- If Republicans Win the Senate in 2014 (1)
- in which celebraties comment on current events (67)
- language / intentionalism (88)
- legal (6)
- My brief conversations with inanimate objects (130)
- NSA / FISA (46)
- One Term to Serve, the 2012 Revival (6)
- Overheard in a Fallujah bunker (27)
- Poems from 196x, Revised by the Ghost of Richard Brauti (27)
- protein wisdom's DNC coverage (30)
- protein wisdom's RNC coverage (29)
- protein wisdom: the movie Lists (20)
- Provocateurism (16)
- real-time empirical observations (51)
- red pills found behind the sofa cushions (42)
- Scenes from my driveway (61)
- Talking back to 80s music (41)
- The Martha Stewart Chronicles (58)
- The protein wisdom interviews (10)
- The protein wisdom original poems (142)
- Uncategorized (20,046)
- Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance, abridged (34)
Recent Comments
- In The Mailbox: 02.28.23 (Afternoon Edition) : The Other McCain on Hey, longtime pw readers…
- In The Mailbox: 12.23.22 : The Other McCain on Patrick J. Carroll truly IS a sad, embittered psychopath
- Danger on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
- Danger on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
- In The Mailbox: 07.18.22 : The Other McCain on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
9 should be so much higher. I mean, hello?! Beatles White album.
Well, you know us conservatives and “change,” Maggie…
I would swear it used to be the number 3 doing the pinching. Are you sure it wasn’t 3 after all, and your vision was a tad blurry at the time?
Hey, now. Don’t h8.
One can be the loneliest number…
Two can be as bad as one…
The Three Dog Night reference kind of breaks down there because they did truckloads of heroin not shrooms.
I made a mistake at first, cranky-d. But in my defense, their profiles look very similar.
So glad you’re back, El Jefe! It was a dry well for a while there….
there should be no 9….because 7 8 9……I think 7 should move up in the rankings, ya know, because of the cannabalism
what part of “between” are you having trouble with? And don’t blame it on Ben –
No idea what you’re talking about, happyfeet…
oh
they always make me say “inclusive” around here – and god help me if I don’t balance my parentheses
Some posts disappear, others morph from what was to what will be.
THAT’S PROGRESS, BABY!!!
did that sound like meanness? sorry.
I really shouldn’t do this at work.
I was teasing you, happyfeet. Check the title again.
3 is always #1 in my book. I just like the way it looks.
Did anyone else notice the code you type in to post is subliminal porn?
trying69
Who’s kidding who?
private99
Thats got to be some gay thing, right?
8 pinching shrooms?
Jaun too.
You can blame 8 … or 3 … all you want. But that 5—I never trusted 5.
Always pretending to be an upside-down 2.
And now the 5 haters come out… Well, you know what, McGehee? That 5 has something you’ll never have. It’s got moxie. And just because you’ll never have the stones to try to pull off an upside-down 2 doesn’t mean you have to piss on someone else’s dreams.
FIVEIST!!
Carin:
I like 3, too, but he’s been kind of an asshole lately. Ordinarily, I’d suggest that Jeff switch 3 and 8 for a while. I mean, they’re identical except for the handlebar moustache. But breaking into Jeff’s stash is really beyond the pale.
McGhee:
I’ve never trusted 5 either: half angled and half round. He seems too indecisive.
I’ve never trusted 5 either: half angled and half round. He seems too indecisive.
Now I know why I don’t trust Obama.
Ahem…. and where may I ask is zero?? You know, the big round 0. Zeros have been discriminated against and made to suffer for centuries, you know considered to be less than full fledged numbers… worthless… empty and all the other biases that zeros have have had to tolerate. It’s discrimination in its worst form. And, may I ask where all you millionaires would be if it wasn’t for zeros? Ever try to write $1,000,000 without zeros?
I’m sorry, but, despite their merits in groups, as an individual, it’s generally agreed that zero is just a big, fat . . . zero.
Pi(e) got screwed again. Not even nominated.
$1E6
$1,000,000 without zeros
$1E6
Sure… try taking that to the bank and cashing it…
Fractions get no respect on the right. I swear it’s like Jim Crow all over again.
Fight the power!
TW: control68 = what else do I need to say?
Yeah that last one was me. What? you got a problem?
Didn’t think so.
Oh, here we go with the 3/5-supremacists again. Don’t you people ever give up?
A genuine upside-down 2 is a thing of beauty, and it doesn’t deserve to be cheapened by some freakin’ 5 in drag.
“I love crooked numbers.”
— Ken “Hawk” Harrelson
“I love it when Hawk loves stuff.”
— me
9 is like a really stacked young thing, and 6 is like old and saggy, so I have to disagree with the numerical order. It’s 9,7,1,4 (plastic, but trying),8,3 (a leaky 8),2,5 (a dyslexic 2),6,and 0.
Just had to toss in my 2 cents here….
Why not any numbers with, you know, more than one digit? I suspect either innumeracy or recidivistic antimathematical bias here. Or maybe the fingers just ran out.
I always liked the combination to the Addams Family vault; 2-10-11 (eyes, fingers, toes). Or the Douglas Addams answer: 42. The upcoming 23 may be derivative of the previous pi but more people will see it. Or that of Chef’s father: $3.50, which also happens to be 50 more than the upcoming 300. So many numbers, so little time….
And don’t get me started about the test words.
Dang, it’s good to have you back, Jeff!