Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Archives

Hitchens on the Use of the Passive Voice [Dan Collins]

Obscurer of agency:

In many other people’s minds, too, there is the unspoken assumption that what the United States does in Iraq is a fully determined action, whereas what other people do is simply a consequence of that action, with no independent or autonomous “agency” of its own.

And:

The habit of viewing Iraq as a crisis that only began in 2003—a lazy habit that is conditioned by the needs of the impending 2008 election—is an obstacle to understanding. Everybody has their own favorite alternative scenario of how things might have evolved differently or better. In some weak moments, I can picture taking the alternative advice from the European Union and the United Nations in 2003—let’s just see how Iraq develops if left alone as a private fiefdom of the Saddam Hussein dynasty—and only then deciding that things have deteriorated to the point where an international intervention is necessitated. That would have been much less upsetting and demanding than the direct assumption of responsibility, and could have been triggered by the more familiar images of unbearable suffering and carnage, and could have summoned the Darfur-like emotions of guilt and shame, but it would perforce have been begun very much later—and perhaps too late altogether.

So, we live in what would be a happily post-historical society, if it weren’t for America’s dreadful anti-quietist habit of triggering more history.  And really, it’s so annoying, when academics have to consider what is actually happening, rather than constructing elaborate monuments to the fancy of the unbound intellect over sherry and Triscuits and rich, mild gouda and veggie plates with dill dip.

Bastards.

Related: Can There Be a Liberal Iraq?

4 Replies to “Hitchens on the Use of the Passive Voice [Dan Collins]”

  1. annak says:

    In strong momements, does he wish this had been done competently? Like, without spilling our drinks?

  2. Pablo says:

    No, he seems to be arguing quite the opposite:

    The habit of viewing Iraq as a crisis that only began in 2003—a lazy habit that is conditioned by the needs of the impending 2008 election—is an obstacle to understanding.

    What exactly is a “competently” fought war? Do you have an example of one that we can compare this to?

  3. McGehee says:

    I never could figure out some people’s obsession with this “end of history” notion. Historians especially should be leery of having their jobs become redundant.

  4. I grew up right at the “end of history” and I can say with great confidence that history isn’t going to be ending any time soon.  My teachers in High School acted like there was nothing left but turning off the lights on the way out.  While I asked about things like China and the Middle East they acted like the only remaining conflict was that pesky Joo Problem in Palestine. 

    Morons.

    I figure this conflict with Radical Islam will continue for another half-century which is not long considering its been fought hot and cold for half a millenia. 

    And would history be over then?  Nah.  There’s always China to deal with.  And if we ever fix all the problems on Earth that’s when the aliens land. 

    That’s fine with me.  Conflict breeds character and advancement.

Comments are closed.