“…I wonder, do these pants make my ass look capitulatory…?”
Search
Archive Calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | |||||
Archives
Categories
- A Government That Can Force You to Buy Health Insurance Can Make You Do Anything (3)
- a protein wisdom philosophy primer (3)
- academics (25)
- armadillo (8)
- Friday Fiction 100 Word Challenge (51)
- from the protein wisdom conceptual series (136)
- identity politics (33)
- If Republicans Win the Senate in 2014 (1)
- in which celebraties comment on current events (67)
- language / intentionalism (88)
- legal (6)
- My brief conversations with inanimate objects (130)
- NSA / FISA (46)
- One Term to Serve, the 2012 Revival (6)
- Overheard in a Fallujah bunker (27)
- Poems from 196x, Revised by the Ghost of Richard Brauti (27)
- protein wisdom's DNC coverage (30)
- protein wisdom's RNC coverage (29)
- protein wisdom: the movie Lists (20)
- Provocateurism (16)
- real-time empirical observations (51)
- red pills found behind the sofa cushions (42)
- Scenes from my driveway (61)
- Talking back to 80s music (41)
- The Martha Stewart Chronicles (58)
- The protein wisdom interviews (10)
- The protein wisdom original poems (142)
- Uncategorized (20,046)
- Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance, abridged (34)
Recent Comments
- In The Mailbox: 02.28.23 (Afternoon Edition) : The Other McCain on Hey, longtime pw readers…
- In The Mailbox: 12.23.22 : The Other McCain on Patrick J. Carroll truly IS a sad, embittered psychopath
- Danger on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
- Danger on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
- In The Mailbox: 07.18.22 : The Other McCain on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
Not sure, but they do seem to be strangling your syntax there, Ned.
No, it’s not your pants, exactly.
TW: you might want to try to force that zipper up.
Sarah,
Given In-bred Ned’s pusillanimity, I’m assuming his answer is “yes” because he wears the zipper in the rear. For easier “negotiating” with civilization’s enemies. Or enemas.
Cordially…
I wonder if he’s detected that faint whiff of defeat that’s in the breeze…
Ned Lamont is the only man I know who actually looks like he wears “Appeasement for Men” – a new cologne from Neville Chamberlin.
Smells like…peace in our times.
TW: And those times will last until the Islamic fascists decide it’s time to reconquer Idaho, which is historically theirs.
And those times will last until the Islamic fascists decide it’s time to reconquer Idaho, which is historically theirs.
Easy there, big fella. I live in Idaho.
Big Paul,
Glad someone finally brought up In-bred Ned’s looks, because if Dan Quayle was supposed to resemble a “deer in the headlights,” then Mentos Boy is a “fawn in the flashlight.”
Cordially…
Kelly-
Sorry about the Idaho thing, but really it is your fault for daring to live in a land that is part of the Great Caliphate. You know, like Israel, Spain, and Costa Rica. Once we give these lands to Al Qaeda, we’ll be left in peace.
…Or pieces. Either way.
TW: I probably shouldn’t be writing this, when I should be doing my work.
No-diddly-dope!
Neddy the Poofter is playing fast and loose with the French National Security Classification System: Run, Hide, Surrender, Collaborate.
Well it does save a lot of effort.
Ned, you shore got purty lips.
“I wonder if standing next to Kos is making my ass look big….?”
“…I wonder, do these pants make my ass look capitulatory…?â€Â
No, but you sure are a fathead, bunky.
tw: who IS this guy?
I just did a search of as many news sites as I could think of, and oddly enough, there is no indication that anybody has asked Lamont to comment on the thwarted attack.
Given his “resounding” victory, one would think he’d have something to say…
“…I wonder, do these pants make my ass look capitulatory…?â€Â
“Those pants make you look like you have no c*ck.” – Amok to the Weevil, The Specials
Nedrenalin – a three months shelf life, followed by a deflated, useless feeling.
tw: ”People power.”
month
We built this city…!
If you go stand next to Cindy it’ll look smaller… no less capitulatory. If you feel threatend have her moooooo at ‘em
I’m going to start calling his supports Nutneds.
Nutned kosbots?
Well, what’d be the Three Laws of Kosbotics?
Here’s Asimov’s Laws:
A robot may not harm a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence, as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Last I checked the potato(e) was to be stored in the front of said capitulatory pants, not in the back.
Just out of curiosity, what WAS the actual recorder voter turnout for the primary?
Here’s my first shot at the laws of Kosbots:
1) A Kosbot may not have an original thought, or through inaction, allow another to have an original thought.
2)A Kosbot must obey the orders of the political elite, unless such elites are not sufficently “progressive”.
3) A Kosbot must protect the existence of the movement, so long as such protection does not threaten said “progressive” political elites or the movement.
OK..strike the last “or the movement”
Tw: hard. But using preview is hard…….
Okay, I’ll give it a rip.
Kos Laws:
A NedNut may not harm a Ned, or, through inaction, allow a Ned to come to harm.
A NedNut must obey the orders given to it by the Townhouse list except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A NedNut must protect its blog, purging from its comments all anti-semitism, right-wing trollery, allusions to class warfare, images in blackface–regardless of how funny they are, detailed plans for the abandonment of Israel, Nazi-sounding neologisms, the phrase “Townhouse list”, impassioned defenses of Jason Leopold, elaborate re-enactments of the Bush adminstration blowing up the World Trade Center, glowing reviews of “Loose Change”, and references to reach-arounds with small, furry animals as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
You think this is funny? I live in CT, and will now have to vote for Joe. I’ve never voted for him in my life – and my life has been much longer and much more grueling than I ever expected it to be.
I mean, who in their right mind (Conservative or not) would vote for Chuck Schumer’s buttboy?
Lost: That reminds me of this Wallace Shawn classic:
I’m glad to see you’ve already realized “Nednuts” is way better.