Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Obama’s DHS to Federal Judge: “Law? We don’t need to follow no stinkin’ law…” [Darleen Click]

King Barry’s crew strikes again …

President Obama’s lawyers admitted to a federal judge late Thursday that they had broken the court’s injunction halting the administration’s new deportation amnesty, issuing thousands of work permits even after Judge Andrew S. Hanen had ordered the program stopped.

The stunning admission, filed just before midnight in Texas, where the case is being heard, is the latest misstep for the administration’s lawyers, who are facing possible sanctions by Judge Hanen for their continued problems in arguing the case.

The Justice Department lawyers said Homeland Security, which is the defendant in the case, told them Wednesday that an immigration agency had approved about 2,000 applications for three-year work permits, which was part of Mr. Obama’s new amnesty, even after Judge Hanen issued his Feb. 16 injunction halting the entire program.

9 Replies to “Obama’s DHS to Federal Judge: “Law? We don’t need to follow no stinkin’ law…” [Darleen Click]”

  1. sdferr says:

    ‘Bout time the judge starts locking these fuckers up for contempt of court, ain’t it? Enough with the make nicey-nice: put ’em in cuffs . . . and start at the top.

  2. Shermlaw says:

    See my comment to the previous post. It is about destruction of the country. The first thing to go is the respect for the Law.

  3. Parker says:

    Tar. Feathers. Some assembly required.

    Next time, consider rope and tree…

  4. Squid says:

    I’m thinking summary judgement against, and contempt charges for all those who processed and approved the illegal permits.

  5. The Monster says:

    You know damned well that if any of us told a judge we’d violated his order, we’d be in County on Contempt of Court as quickly as the deputies could get us transported.

  6. McGehee says:

    A bench warrant naming the then-DHS secretary and the relevant subordinate officials might get someone’s attention.

    “Sovereign immunity” does not extend to carrying out orders that are clearly illegal.

  7. Drumwaster says:

    The stunning admission, filed just before midnight in Texas, where the case is being heard, is the latest misstep for the administration’s lawyers, who are facing possible sanctions by Judge Hanen for their continued problems in arguing the case.

    Sanctions? What possible sanctions could they face? Losing their license? Giving up the right to argue cases before this particular judge or court? Because any monetary fines are in effect being paid for by the taxpayers. And it’s not like their “firm” will suddenly be driven out of business.

  8. Nothing significant will happen to these Despots.

    If they have to publically be ‘lashed’ it will be with a wet noodle, as it were, and they will be given a sinecure in some Leftist ‘non-profit’.

    There is no Law anymore and Order is starting to break down – the only unknown being how quickly will the descent into Chaos be.

  9. ERRATA…

    -Should be ‘publicly’.

    -Should be ‘Despotic Apparatchiks’.

    Apologies tendered.

Comments are closed.