The Left’s rigid orthodoxy and thought-policing is pretty obvious to the heretics and apostates.
If you belong to one of the favored, pet demographics — female, black, gay, etc — you will be treasured as long as you conform to the dogma. Otherwise
SHUT-UP traitor …
If you are a white, or honorary white, male
SHUT-UP and DIE!
The courage of young people to resist the dominate narrative, social shaming (even punishment) needs to be showcased.
Last night a Facebook notification showed up on my screen. A friend had posted a picture to my wall.
What I saw disgusted me.
The commenter said, “[Rand Paul] is pretty much regarded as a racist, sexist, a**hole along with the rest of his party.”
Because I am a black woman, the commenter said I was foolish for liking Rand Paul.
I identify as a constitutional conservative. The most important political issue to me is the application of the Constitution. That’s not going to change in 2016. […]
[A]ccording to the post I was reading, my love for the Constitution is not supposed to be my primary issue.
Social problems are.
I am supposed to support the candidate who panders to minorities. I am supposed to support the candidate who places women above men in a misguided approach to equality. I am supposed to support the candidate who offers free contraception. I am supposed to support the candidate that speaks softly to me in idealistic sweet nothings, telling me only what I want to hear, thinking I am not smart enough to care about the state of our economy.
But despite my color, gender, economic standing, sexual preference or any other imaginable category, I refuse to let the world define me by of what they see on the outside. That’s something progressives always insist on doing.
I want no part of it.
i too am a strong black woman
Honey, honey, honey
said the critic. Should we help him out?
Honey is sweet. (Nutritious stuff, honey. Good for ya.)
Honey is long-lived. (Keeps for ages and ages and ages.)
Honey is bee-business. (Bees. Y’know. Those lil’ things with stingers and venom?)
i got some honey from kansas cause of i felt bad for their budget situation and all
at least i think i did
this was like awhile ago and no honey’s come yet but i guess it’s ok since they never charged my card
wtf’s the matter with kansas
only song of this hooch i can even stand
never listened to her what’s that they call it music? but recall a moment some years ago when the thought that one of her tits was going to pop out unbidden did come to mind
that’s really a producer’s track where she just warbles in accompaniment
to help the critics out just a bit more, a handy guide-line:
Bujumbura? Yes!
Baltimore? No!
i sit and wonder
does the message get to you?
and it don’t know why
i put that in me cloud thank you
Bujumbura! Represent!~
Greetings:
Personally, I think that white males have been doing a pretty good job putting up with it. But then they’ve had the benefit of judas-goat leadership, lawfare, and the long march through the institutions to help them along their way.
Fundamental transformation, like making omelets, isn’t meant to work for all involved.
Repent oh thou sinner, repent or be damned forever.
Hate speech comes to Wisconsin. If you hate a tyrant, keep it yourself bub. Or else…
It’s quite the nice bit of asymmetrical warfare Persecutor Chisholm has going on there — he uses the instrumentalities of massive, overwrought government to attack and punish his perceived partisan opposition . . . and the ordinary citizen of Wisconsin cannot use a baseball bat, say, to pummel Persecutor Chisholm’s ribs.
Why use a baseball bat when you have the Office of the Attorney General?
It’s nice to see that Comrade Chisholm is being aided and abetted by a member of the Quisling Party:
Of course, not. The accusation is enough, especially by such an Honorable Man – so are they all, all honorable men!
Who’s “you” in that context Ernst? The ordinary citizen (of whatever political party, but who happens to hate tyranny) who yet sees no action taken to protect innocents injured repeatedly and in an ongoing fashion? What, we at some distance will wonder, is this Attorney General of Wisconsin doing about these abuses in particular? They don’t seem to be at an end, certainly. Persecutor Chisholm’s powers have not been removed. Indeed, the multiple pending court cases regarding the suits against the John Doe persecutions don’t promise to put the abuses to an end, but those abuses appear to be added to here in this very story. Just seems like a bat swinging response is a possible (and prosecutable, as noted) human response. Though again, as noted, not likely on account of the imbalance of powers.