Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Rove to be indicted?

Raw Story readies the Bushitler nog and prepares to thank Santa for bringing them a “holiday” scalp; Tom Maguire remains dubious.

Me?  I think a Rove indictment is certainly possible, but that a conviction is remote.  Of course, if the Tom Delay circus has taught us anything, it’s that the indictment itself is the victory.  And I imagine the Dems would be quite happy with an administration robbed of its senior advisor and a brutally effective GOP House Majority leader—not to mention the opportunity to further trumpet the “culture of corruption” (which they haven’t the intellectual honesty to term the “cultureof perceived corruption, based on a series of unproven allegations ginned up by partisan provocateurs”.  Either that, or they simply couldn’t fit it on a bumper sticker).

18 Replies to “Rove to be indicted?”

  1. Does anyone else find it… disturbing… that the press is running with the “culture of corruption” crap, while studiously ignoring the Democrats covering up the final report from the last Clinton special prosecutor? In that case, we’re not talking about a CIA office drone being exposed, but the misuse of the IRS and DOJ to try to cover up bribery…

  2. Cat burglar in a time of armed robbery says:

    This admin doesn’t hold a candle to the shenanigans of Clinton and her husband while in office. Even after they left, there was still stuff going on which reminds me, what happened with the whole Sandy Berger thing?

    tw: road

  3. rls says:

    IMO I think that it is doubtful that he will be indicted.  Too much loose shit in this whole investigation.  Just a lot of wistful thinking by the moonbats.

    tw wrong as in “They are”

  4. what happened with the whole Sandy Berger thing?

    I believe he was fined, then banned from serving in a government position requiring access to classified information until 2009—unless the government really wants him, in which case the ban can be ignored.

    Actually, I’m not sure about the fine. The rest of it, I’m positive about. In other words, the little weasel got away with it.

  5. Panty Liner in an time of MaxiPads says:

    Call me short sighted, but I’m just so thankful nobody’s getting their cock sucked in the oval office anymore. I know decorum is not that important in the overall scheme of things but still……

  6. – Its getting to the point where a good day for the Defeat-o-crats is when one of the terrible dozen manages NOT to say something indefensibly stupid. If they keep up the present level of irresponsible feckless rhetoric until the 2008 elections roll around, they’ll probably be reduced to showing up for work in sack clouth and horse drawn carraiges.

    – The Dembulbs apparently think Rove is some sort of windmill that requires a continuous campaign of jousting till their dicks are hopelessly in the dirt. Every new maleprop executed by the Liberdinks is hailed as yet more proof of Roves infallibility, and well, of course. It could’nt possibly be they themselves. Well could it?

    word up: Every day Marxist educators throughout the land “plant” the seed of paranoia in their young impressionable charges…..

  7. Madame in a time of Pimps says:

    Imagine what it will be like when there is a female president? Intrigue and scandal…and no DNA to rat you out!

    tw: along

  8. alex says:

    Call me short sighted, but I’m just so thankful nobody’s getting their cock sucked in the oval office anymore.

    What, you don’t think Laura Bush has a playful side?

  9. Carin says:

    Crawford – from what I read, they are not only ignoring it, they are actively suppressing it.

  10. richard mcenroe says:

    Has RawStory been right on this one yet?

  11. wishbone says:

    And now, for most fuckheaded reasoning of the year on this very fuckheaded topic…Robert Novak chimes in with “I don’t have to answer…go ask the President.”

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/14/AR2005121402121.html

    For anyone who has read Douglas Adams–we really should pack these guys on a ship of their own and send them on their way.

  12. wishbone says:

    Novak that is…not the President and Rove.

  13. Old Dad in a time of snot nosed brats says:

    OT

    We’re 30 minutes into the Iraqi elections.

    Go democracy

  14. richard mcenroe says:

    Carter has already declared it invalid.

  15. Smithy says:

    No way Rove goes down.  Sorry wingnuts.

  16. Paul Zrimsek says:

    If we keep squeezing hard enough on that lump of coal we got for Fitzmas it’s bound to turn into a diamond sooner or later.

  17. Certainly Not Karl says:

    Ha! I and my bulging frontal lobes sneer at this Fitzgerald punk! Ha! And Ha! again!

    Hypothetically.

  18. richard mcenroe says:

    Rove to be indicted!

    UFO to land on Central Park lawn!

Comments are closed.