If you believe in liberty, which requires individual sovereignty and the eschewing of a powerful centralized authority in a free market economy, then this may be the most important article you’ll read in a long time, evincing as it does the death spiral of free enterprise and the unconscionable, anti-American (in the strictest sense) movement toward a liberal fascist political ruling structure — exacerbated under Obama and helped along by feckless and impotent GOP crony capitalists. Jim Clifton, Chairman and CEO of Gallup:
The U.S. now ranks not first, not second, not third, but 12th among developed nations in terms of business startup activity. Countries such as Hungary, Denmark, Finland, New Zealand, Sweden, Israel and Italy all have higher startup rates than America does.
We are behind in starting new firms per capita, and this is our single most serious economic problem. Yet it seems like a secret. You never see it mentioned in the media, nor hear from a politician that, for the first time in 35 years, American business deaths now outnumber business births.
The U.S. Census Bureau reports that the total number of new business startups and business closures per year — the birth and death rates of American companies — have crossed for the first time since the measurement began. I am referring to employer businesses, those with one or more employees, the real engines of economic growth. Four hundred thousand new businesses are being born annually nationwide, while 470,000 per year are dying.
[…]
Until 2008, startups outpaced business failures by about 100,000 per year. But in the past six years, that number suddenly turned upside down. There has been an underground earthquake. As you read this, we are at minus 70,000 in terms of business survival. The data are very slow coming out of the U.S. Department of Census, via the Small Business Administration, so it lags real time by two years.
[…]
Business startups outpaced business failures by about 100,000 per year until 2008. But in the past six years, that number suddenly reversed, and the net number of U.S. startups versus closures is minus 70,000.
[…]
My hunch is that no one talks about the birth and death rates of American business because Wall Street and the White House, no matter which party occupies the latter, are two gigantic institutions of persuasion. The White House needs to keep you in the game because their political party needs your vote. Wall Street needs the stock market to boom, even if that boom is fueled by illusion. So both tell us, “The economy is coming back.”
Let’s get one thing clear: This economy is never truly coming back unless we reverse the birth and death trends of American businesses.
[…]
It is catastrophic to be dead wrong on the biggest issue of the last 50 years — the issue of where jobs come from. Our leadership keeps thinking that the answer to economic growth and ultimately job creation is more innovation, and we continue to invest billions in it. But an innovation is worthless until an entrepreneur creates a business model for it and turns that innovative idea in something customers will buy. Yet current thinking tells us we’re on the right track and don’t need different strategies, so we continue marching down the path of national decline, believing innovation will save us.
I don’t want to sound like a doomsayer, but when small and medium-sized businesses are dying faster than they’re being born, so is free enterprise. And when free enterprise dies, America dies with it.
Let’s run some numbers. You will often hear from otherwise credible sources that there are 26 million businesses in America. This is misleading; 20 million of these reported “businesses” are inactive companies that have no sales, profits, customers or workers. The only number that is useful and instructive is the number of current operating businesses with one or more employees.
There are only 6 million businesses in the United States with one or more employees. Of those, 3.8 million have four or fewer employees — mom and pop shops owned by people who aren’t building a business as much as they are building a life. And God bless them all. That is what America is for. We need every single one of them.
Next, there are about a million companies with five to nine employees, 600,000 businesses with 10 to 19 employees, and 500,000 companies with 20 to 99 employees. There are 90,000 businesses with 100 to 499 employees. And there are just 18,000 with 500 employees or more, and that figure includes about a thousand companies with 10,000 employees or more. Altogether, that is America, Inc.
Let me be very clear. America, Inc. is far more important to America’s security than our military. Because without the former prospering — and solvent — there is no latter. We have enormous military power only because of a growing economy that has, so far, made it possible for the government to pay its bills. When former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, was asked in a Senate hearing on June 28, 2011, to name the biggest current threat to the security of the United States, he didn’t say al-Qaida. He didn’t say Iran’s nuclear capabilities. He answered, “I believe our debt is the greatest threat to our national security.”
[…]
Keep in mind that these 6 million businesses, especially small and medium-sized ones, provide jobs for more than 100 million Americans and much of the tax base for everything. These small, medium and big businesses have generated the biggest economy in the world, which has allowed the country to afford lavish military and social spending and entitlements. And we’ve been able to afford all of this because, until now, we’ve dominated the world economy.
When new businesses aren’t being born, the free enterprise system and jobs decline. And without a growing free enterprise system, without a growing entrepreneurial economy, there are no new good jobs. That means declining revenues and smaller salaries to tax, followed by declining aid for the elderly and poor and declining funding for the military, for education, for infrastructure — declining revenues for everything.
America has maintained the biggest tax coffers in the world because its 300+ million citizens have produced and owned one-quarter of virtually all global wealth. The United States clobbered everyone in the battle of free enterprise, in the battle of business building, and in the battle of inventing the future. Until recently, America had blown the world away in terms of economic success. We are now quickly losing that edge, and everything we’re trying to do to fix the problem is dead wrong.
Here’s why: Entrepreneurship is not systematically built into our culture the way innovation or intellectual development is. You might say, “Well, I see a lot of entrepreneurial activity in the country.” Yes, that’s true, but entrepreneurship is now in decline for the first time since the U.S. government started measuring it.
The whole country and subsequently the world are having their own dead-wrong moment, and it is causing America and the whole world to make everything worse. And people know it, though they may not know why. When Gallup asked Americans to rate how much they personally worry about particular problems facing the country, the top three issues that respondents worry about a “great deal” were the economy (59%), federal spending and the budget deficit (58%), and the availability and affordability of healthcare (57%).
[…]
Because we have misdiagnosed the cause and effect of economic growth, we have misdiagnosed the cause and effect of job creation. To get back on track, we need to quit pinning everything on innovation, and we need to start focusing on the almighty entrepreneurs and business builders. And that means we have to find them.
This is what Marxist policy brings along with it: the destruction of a thriving economy and the slow but inevitable polarization of the haves and have nots, brought about by crony capitalism and government thumb scaling. Because we are so glib to jettison the lessons learned first-hand by our Founders and Framers, who put in place a system that empowered individuals, individual choice, and promoted property rights — along with a document meant to restrain the heavy hand of federal government interference in our every day affairs, be they business or personal (contract law was good enough) — we find ourselves drifting into a paradigm wherein people are able, in the plurality, to vote themselves the wealth and labor of their neighbors. But as Thatcher once famously said (paraphrasing), “that kind of bullshit economic system only works until you run out of other people’s money.”
That’s where we’re headed, and it’s no accident: to destroy the capitalist system, Alinsky knew you must destroy the middle class. And you did this not by alienating them but by pretending to be their champions, even as your policies created a kind of economic divide whereby you have a rich elite, tied to government, and the masses over whom this coalition rules. That is liberal fascism — and it has always been the natural endpoint of socialism, because those in power never really want to give over the means of production to the people: they want to rule over them, and so they position themselves with power and money to exert outsized control over the social compact.
We are on the road to serfdom. And too many of us are skipping merrily down that road without a brain.
Sadly, no Wizard is going to grant them one at the end of the road, either.
(h/t Mark Levin)
Round Two
Brain and brain. What is brain?
Shouldn’t there be an “unexpectedly” in there somewhere?
I have seen the future and it is XXXXXXLent.
You guys, I’m totally (in)famous. Pablo tipped me off to my Tweet getting read by Dana Loesch as “hate mail” in her BlazeTV show today.
Earlier in the week, she mentioned HoHos as a Little Debbie product, so I tweeted this, just for fun.
She & her staff couldn’t tell it was a joke. I guess her regular H8rs are bad enough they can’t be parodied.
Sheez.
I think there’s something wrong with me. First I was totally uninterested in Facebook, then I perceived the whole twitter thing as little more than mass navel gazing. To this day I cannot fathom why anyone would devote even a tiny part of their precious life to either.
I probably should seek professional help.
I found socializing on the internet much more fun before “social networking.”
My comment to that effect on Facebook was much-liked and -shared.
:facepalm:
I recently signed on to Facebook (with my real name; I’m not telling you mooks what it is because The Streams Must Not Cross), so most of my “friends” are family, cousins, and old college friends.
They say that Twitter makes you like people you don’t even know whereas Facebook makes you hate the people you do know.
Boy howdy, is that right. On Twitter, you follow people you find witty or clever or interesting; on Facebook, you’re obligated to follow family and friends that you’d rather not hear from ever again. (I spent 18 hours of having my skin crawl when I accepted a friend request from a Narcissistic ex with no boundaries before I unfriended him and changed my settings so he couldn’t ask again.)
In my case, the people I’m interested in hearing from hardly post, whereas the relatives whom I don’t much care for fill up my timeline with trivialites and keep inviting me to play Candy Crush.
I signed on to stalk my siblings (all living in other states), because sometimes they post photos of their kids and stuff. Instead I get a constant stream of “inspirational thoughts” and articles about pit-bull biting incidents.
Fortunately, Facebook lets you exclude people’s posts from your timeline without their knowing, but that introduces the hazard of them finding out when you don’t respond to something they say.
Not to mention the “Facebook Effect,” wherein everyone else’s life seems wonderful and yours awful. In my case, I’ve reconnected with old friends whose children are just starting college and getting married and doing wonderful things — and I have no kids at all, as if my life hadn’t even started yet and it’s more than half over. </self-pity>
The only reason I keep it is to yell at Chris Stewart and to comment on Glenn Beck and Dana Loesch and Red-Eye Radio’s timelines. To increase my audience, see, because What I Have To Say is Just That Important.
As for the rest of it, Facebook is full of spiders. It’s slow (its content servers take a long time to respond to requests) and the notifications are the LAST thing to load. Even on a corporate internet connection, Facebook’s delays (even moving from one page to another) are interminable.
Furthermore, I cannot go back and look at comments I’ve made on other people’s posts or pages, nor can I see what I’ve Liked, etc. No HTML formatting in the comments (including hyperlinks). Not user-friendly at ALL.
But I can’t complain to Facebook because I’m not the customer, I’m the product. They just added an indexing function wherein people can search for a person plus a key word.
I’m torn between Being Careful and Tossing Caution To The Wind.
Nope, don’t like it at all.
:: looks at wall o’ words ::
It would appear that the ADDerall has kicked in. WORK TO DO!
PW threads use a pre-social-networking technology. They rock.
Other sites I hung out at 12-18 years ago subsequently adopted social-media-like infrastructure and drove all their regulars away before folding altogether. I miss those sites.
Of course, one of my favorite things to do there, way back when, surfaced here for a while so many years ago that Jeff wasn’t even a homeowner yet: commenters improvising a long-running comedy — in the latter case, set at Jeff’s.
I wonder if his ex-landlord is still in the basement, under the fridge?
[…] Government Deal JustOneMinute: Live From Paris, It’s Saturday Night! Protein Wisdom: The Argument Over Obama’s “Fundamental Transformation” Is Over Shot In the Dark: (Bombed) Houses Of The Holy The Gateway Pundit: #BlackLivesMatter Protesters Hold […]