You mean liberals don’t walk the walk? Color me shocked!
Except, of course, NOT.
There are two kinds of people who get to ignore the law, those that make it and those that break it. Doesn’t matter what the subject is, rules are always for the “little people”. That’s what “privilege” means — “private law”.
****Also, why is our government sending bus loads of illegals to certain communities and not others? Why not send them to Palm Beach, Aspen, or even to Warren Buffett or Sheldon Adelson’s houses?*****
Mark Levin addressed the “Sheldon Adelson, Warren Buffett and Bill Gates on Immigration Reform” NYT op-ed during his Friday show.
In New York City, First Lady Michelle Obama spoke at the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) convention, promising that her husband would act on his own to fix the broken immigration system.
Obama reminded the attendees that they couldn’t wait for Congress to act on their future and urged them to seize opportunities on their own.
“We cannot afford to wait on Congress to lift up our next generation. We can’t afford to wait on anybody when it comes to our kids’ future,” she said. “Your grandparents and parents didn’t wait for opportunities to come to them. No, they packed up their families and moved to this country for a better life.”
“No, they packed up their families and moved to this country for a better life.”
And when they got here, they stood in line, filled out the forms, worked their asses off, taught their kids how great this country was, and waited for however long it took to raise their right hand and swear allegiance to the United States. They didn’t send their kids separately to leech off the welfare State and sneak across the borders in violation of the rules.
Why is it that the US is the only country on the planet that isn’t allowed to secure its own national borders? Hell, even Israel gets borders, even if the progressives want it to be the ones defined almost half a century (and three wars) ago…
2013 Reauthorization of the “Violence Against Women Act of 1994”
[Which includes “The Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000” which has the provisions that are being used to cause the current immigration mess]
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY–S. 47:
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013):
Feb. 7, 11, 12, considered and passed Senate.
Feb. 28, considered and passed House.
Signed March 7, 2013.
May 2, 2013 Obama meets with Mexican President
May 3, 2013 Obama speaks to Mexican businessmen
May 3-4, 2013 Obama meets with the leaders of Central American countries Costa Rica, Belize, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama.
May 4, 2013 Obama attends a business conference aimed at fostering economic cooperation between the U.S. and Central American nations.
Only thing not stated is that most, if not all, of these countries are socialist-crony-capitalist.
Bill, whittling away with a series of interrogatives, putting questions in the minds of listeners, in place of building his case with a series of affirmative declaratives.
Do you really want to know where Zuckerberg lives so you can flood his neighborhood with fliers? Is that fine? Is it Here then? Was the question of Zuckerberg’s neighborhood easily enough answered by a simple internet search? Was that even a real question? Does Bill Whittle really want to do this or does he want someone else to do this? Do you see? Is this interrogative form more fun compared with declaratives? More cogent? More irritating?
Another thing, unrelated to the subject at hand. I done an anim about Harry Reid’s disingenuous illegal distractions on the Senate floor where the pathetic little troll is immune from prosecution. It has to do with using high school required reading, 1984, as user manual for Senate leadership, such as it is. Droll, I know, but eh.
You’ve seen perhaps visual reproductions of the so-called “cheat sheets” placed in the hands of incipient cross-border invaders from the south, bour3, instructing them on the questions they will be asked and providing answers to those questions which will, once given, see to it that the invader will be given some sort of asylum in the United States?
Looks like Whittle might want some similar cheat sheet to be given to the invaders once they have been granted temporary asylum (asylum with instructions to appear before an administrative court on a certain date future), with detailed explanation how Mark Zuckerberg desires to help the invaders and how, as well, to make their way to his domicile, there to ask and receive Zuckerberg’s largess.
“Do you really want to know where Zuckerberg lives so you can flood his neighborhood with fliers”
It’s called a rhetorical question, or a Gedankenexperiment if you prefer. Of course he doesn’t really want to send dozens or hundreds of poor folks to Z’s place. That would be a Cloward-Piven move, which is what the Left does. He asks the question as a device to get reasonable people to reach the same conclusion he’s laid out, which is that Z may love him some poor oppressed brown people in theory, NIMBY does still apply in practice.
See also the opposition to wind farms off the coast of Martha’s Vinyard where they might spoil the view of Leftist elites.
***Many don’t make it across the river; multiple sources became emotional when recounting their discoveries of small, lifeless bodies washed up along the riverbank. ***
And this is the result of a conscious application of policy? Of course it is. But who will hold the policy-maker responsible? No one. Of course.
You mean liberals don’t walk the walk? Color me shocked!
Except, of course, NOT.
There are two kinds of people who get to ignore the law, those that make it and those that break it. Doesn’t matter what the subject is, rules are always for the “little people”. That’s what “privilege” means — “private law”.
****Also, why is our government sending bus loads of illegals to certain communities and not others? Why not send them to Palm Beach, Aspen, or even to Warren Buffett or Sheldon Adelson’s houses?*****
Mark Levin addressed the “Sheldon Adelson, Warren Buffett and Bill Gates on Immigration Reform” NYT op-ed during his Friday show.
Send them to Berkeley, and they will not only feel right at home with the “Let’s All Hate America” mindset, but also get free pot!
“No, they packed up their families and moved to this country for a better life.”
And when they got here, they stood in line, filled out the forms, worked their asses off, taught their kids how great this country was, and waited for however long it took to raise their right hand and swear allegiance to the United States. They didn’t send their kids separately to leech off the welfare State and sneak across the borders in violation of the rules.
Why is it that the US is the only country on the planet that isn’t allowed to secure its own national borders? Hell, even Israel gets borders, even if the progressives want it to be the ones defined almost half a century (and three wars) ago…
Honduran President Vows To Keep Dumping Illegal Alien Children On U.S. Border Until His Friend President Obama Says To Stop….
2013 Reauthorization of the “Violence Against Women Act of 1994”
[Which includes “The Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000” which has the provisions that are being used to cause the current immigration mess]
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY–S. 47:
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013):
Feb. 7, 11, 12, considered and passed Senate.
Feb. 28, considered and passed House.
Signed March 7, 2013.
May 2, 2013 Obama meets with Mexican President
May 3, 2013 Obama speaks to Mexican businessmen
May 3-4, 2013 Obama meets with the leaders of Central American countries Costa Rica, Belize, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama.
May 4, 2013 Obama attends a business conference aimed at fostering economic cooperation between the U.S. and Central American nations.
Only thing not stated is that most, if not all, of these countries are socialist-crony-capitalist.
The Timeline Of The “Border Crisis” – An Intentionally Manufactured Crisis Created To Advance Comprehensive Immigration Reform ?
ticking clock news
‘Operation Normandy’ Seeks 3,500 Volunteers by Next May to ‘Stop an Invasion’ at U.S.-Mexico Border
Bill, whittling away with a series of interrogatives, putting questions in the minds of listeners, in place of building his case with a series of affirmative declaratives.
Do you really want to know where Zuckerberg lives so you can flood his neighborhood with fliers? Is that fine? Is it Here then? Was the question of Zuckerberg’s neighborhood easily enough answered by a simple internet search? Was that even a real question? Does Bill Whittle really want to do this or does he want someone else to do this? Do you see? Is this interrogative form more fun compared with declaratives? More cogent? More irritating?
Another thing, unrelated to the subject at hand. I done an anim about Harry Reid’s disingenuous illegal distractions on the Senate floor where the pathetic little troll is immune from prosecution. It has to do with using high school required reading, 1984, as user manual for Senate leadership, such as it is. Droll, I know, but eh.
You’ve seen perhaps visual reproductions of the so-called “cheat sheets” placed in the hands of incipient cross-border invaders from the south, bour3, instructing them on the questions they will be asked and providing answers to those questions which will, once given, see to it that the invader will be given some sort of asylum in the United States?
Looks like Whittle might want some similar cheat sheet to be given to the invaders once they have been granted temporary asylum (asylum with instructions to appear before an administrative court on a certain date future), with detailed explanation how Mark Zuckerberg desires to help the invaders and how, as well, to make their way to his domicile, there to ask and receive Zuckerberg’s largess.
“Do you really want to know where Zuckerberg lives so you can flood his neighborhood with fliers”
It’s called a rhetorical question, or a Gedankenexperiment if you prefer. Of course he doesn’t really want to send dozens or hundreds of poor folks to Z’s place. That would be a Cloward-Piven move, which is what the Left does. He asks the question as a device to get reasonable people to reach the same conclusion he’s laid out, which is that Z may love him some poor oppressed brown people in theory, NIMBY does still apply in practice.
See also the opposition to wind farms off the coast of Martha’s Vinyard where they might spoil the view of Leftist elites.
*** Many don’t make it across the river; multiple sources became emotional when recounting their discoveries of small, lifeless bodies washed up along the riverbank. ***
And this is the result of a conscious application of policy? Of course it is. But who will hold the policy-maker responsible? No one. Of course.