Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Variations on a theme

Obama In Straightjacket Costume Gets Employees ‘Sensitivity Training’“.

Sometimes you have to destroy the first amendment in order to save it.  For the right people.

 

23 Replies to “Variations on a theme”

  1. bgbear says:

    Do the French get offended by “crazy Napoleon” costumes?

  2. sdferr says:

    Whoof, you smell that?”

    “Yeah, seems bad doesn’t it? But don’t worry, since we know it’s nothing to worry about: it’s just the rotting corpse of the United States — the maggots and vultures will remove it soon enough, the air will clear and all will be well. Now go about your business — move on.”

  3. Drumwaster says:

    “When in the Course of Human Events…”

    That ticking gets louder by the day.

  4. happyfeet says:

    our human resources bitch is this outsourced ghetto-assed chola

    she can tell I don’t like her cause i giver her this look like she’s a disgusting outsourced ghetto-assed chola

  5. happyfeet says:

    *give her* this look I mean

    I just had pan de los muertos with boysenberry jam and it was spiritual

  6. palaeomerus says:

    ” Sometimes you have to destroy the first amendment in order to : _________________________”

    Make it into delicious game-sausage and mount its pelt as a trophy in your private barber’s work area.

    Immanentize the eschaton.

    ???
    Profit!

    Give the Hegelian machine a good kick if you don’t grok what it is currently synthesizing.

    Piss right in Columbia’s eye and tell her it is raining, as you roll her out of the cab into a Stuckey’s parking lot, on your way to a place called power, via the will express lane route.

    Eliminate heterodoxy for the sake of diversity and tolerance.

    Help mankind be more free by muzzling individual people everywhere.

  7. happyfeet says:

    i believe in crystal light cause i believe in me

  8. bgbear says:

    Human Resource departments would be better if they had to show how they added to the profit of the company. This sensitivity training no doubt costs a fortune and adds nothing to the bottom line.

  9. leigh says:

    HR is were psychology students who weren’t any good at it end up.

    Happy, is said chola ghetto fabulous with the two inch manicure and giant hoop earrings?

  10. SBP says:

    “I’ve never met one of you [HR people] who didn’t suck. I’ve never known an HR person who had anything but a mediocre mentality.”” — Steve Jobs to a candidate to head Apple’s HR department, after the board finally forced him to hire one.

  11. happyfeet says:

    she tones it down when she visits but I’ve seen her titty tats and she’s rockin the eyebrows

  12. palaeomerus says:

    “This sensitivity training no doubt costs a fortune and adds nothing to the bottom line. ”

    The on books justification for it probably reads something like “sending the employee to the qualified retraining program insulates the company from a law suit that might proceed from said employee’s future imprudent action making some unfortunate and probably unintended contact with a scary parasitic quasi professional litigious entity looking for an unguarded vein to tap”.

    Or:

    “We told him he was a crazy unacceptable asshole who needed to take it down a notch so this thing he did is totally on him and not a product of any contributory negligence on our part.

  13. leigh says:

    I knew it. I’ll bet she wears her clothes too tight, too.

  14. happyfeet says:

    yup that’s how she ends up exposing her tats

    which I’m sure “paychex” has already written her up for at least once

    I’m hoping by the end of next year we can ditch this paychex thing

    it’s not just the chola the whole operation is very very ghetto

  15. SBP says:

    Does that eyebrow thing actually look attractive to anyone? ‘Cause I just don’t get it at all.

  16. sdferr says:

    It’s good though that a department could be created to retain those people with the least knowledge of the subject nominally under their purview as possible. It makes for such an efficient employment of the simply unemployable.

  17. leigh says:

    That link is a scream, happy. I forgot about the lip liner.

  18. bgbear says:

    I know palaeomerus. It is like trying to prove a negative. It is why HR departments expand wildly.

  19. happyfeet says:

    these were the first cholas I ever met and back then the eyebrows were pretty tame but you can see somethings starting to happen there… the aesthetic is very sugar skull I think but I have no idea where this came from or why they do this on themselves

    I do know this, however

    “in echo park women don’t use weapons to prove a point, they use weapons for love”

    i feel you, sad girl

  20. leigh says:

    In the 70s I went to high school with a lot of cholas who had the over-plucked eyebrows, make-up they put on with a palette knife and wore a lot of rings and super ornate crucifixes. They wore their hair really long, too but had the fluffy Farrah Fawcett bangs. It was sort of a super long mullet.

    You should watch the movie “My Crazy Life” about a couple of girls from Echo Park. It was made in the 90s, but it’s an accurate portrayal of life in the ‘hood.

  21. leigh says:

    Never mind. I should have clicked your link first.

  22. McGehee says:

    The on books justification for it probably reads something like “sending the employee to the qualified retraining program insulates the company from a law suit that might proceed from

    …firing the fucking crybaby who couldn’t take a fucking joke. I mean come on — that was a fucking hilarious costume, and we wish it had won.

    FTFT

  23. bgbear says:

    I was in high school in the late seventies. The chicas had really poofy hair and used lots of Aqua Net hairspray. It looked like they always had clouds over their heads with the hairspray.

Comments are closed.