No, the fact that the Obamacare administration knew isn’t a shocker — unless, of course, you were either a blinded progressive ideologue who didn’t realize that Obama would have no trouble shooting his footsoldiers once they’d fulfilled their purpose of selling this pile of shit; or were one of those who continued to insist Obama was a garden-variety liberal Democrat who, though he differed with us on policy, nevertheless had what he believed were the best interests of the country at heart, a good man who simply didn’t agree with the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the rule of law, the separation of powers, checks and balances, enumerated powers, or precedent, agitating for fundamental transformation with the same and equally valid zeal as those of us who have long held that “elections have consequences” doesn’t mean “elections alter the Constitution” (in both cases marking you as something of a naive or opportunistic moron) — but rather, the fact that it is NBC who is reporting this, now that’s the shocker:
President Obama repeatedly assured Americans that after the Affordable Care Act became law, people who liked their health insurance would be able to keep it. But millions of Americans are getting or are about to get cancellation letters for their health insurance under Obamacare, say experts, and the Obama administration has known that for at least three years.
Four sources deeply involved in the Affordable Care Act tell NBC NEWS that 50 to 75 percent of the 14 million consumers who buy their insurance individually can expect to receive a “cancellation” letter or the equivalent over the next year because their existing policies don’t meet the standards mandated by the new health care law. One expert predicts that number could reach as high as 80 percent. And all say that many of those forced to buy pricier new policies will experience “sticker shock.”
None of this should come as a shock to the Obama administration. The law states that policies in effect as of March 23, 2010 will be “grandfathered,” meaning consumers can keep those policies even though they don’t meet requirements of the new health care law. But the Department of Health and Human Services then wrote regulations that narrowed that provision, by saying that if any part of a policy was significantly changed since that date — the deductible, co-pay, or benefits, for example — the policy would not be grandfathered.
Buried in Obamacare regulations from July 2010 is an estimate that because of normal turnover in the individual insurance market, “40 to 67 percent” of customers will not be able to keep their policy. And because many policies will have been changed since the key date, “the percentage of individual market policies losing grandfather status in a given year exceeds the 40 to 67 percent range.”
That means the administration knew that more than 40 to 67 percent of those in the individual market would not be able to keep their plans, even if they liked them.
Yet President Obama, who had promised in 2009, “if you like your health plan, you will be able to keep your health plan,” was still saying in 2012, “If [you] already have health insurance, you will keep your health insurance.”
“This says that when they made the promise, they knew half the people in this market outright couldn’t keep what they had and then they wrote the rules so that others couldn’t make it either,” said Robert Laszewski, of Health Policy and Strategy Associates, a consultant who works for health industry firms. Laszewski estimates that 80 percent of those in the individual market will not be able to keep their current policies and will have to buy insurance that meets requirements of the new law, which generally requires a richer package of benefits than most policies today.
The White House does not dispute that many in the individual market will lose their current coverage, but argues they will be offered better coverage in its place, and that many will get tax subsidies that would offset any increased costs.
— Which is a direct contradiction to the promise that if you liked your policy you could keep it. Because you’re actually getting something better, we’re now told, you should thank Obama, no criticize him. He misled you to make your lives better. For your own good — and for the Greater Good. And that took guts! In fact, it is the very definition of leadership! The ends justify the means. So stop your carping and count your blessings, rubes. Obama has taken to wearing this new crown of thorns so that you may not suffer. Bless him.
[…]
Today, White House spokesman Jay Carney was asked about the president’s promise that consumers would be able to keep their health care. “What the president said and what everybody said all along is that there are going to be changes brought about by the Affordable Care Act to create minimum standards of coverage, minimum services that every insurance plan has to provide,” Carney said. “So it’s true that there are existing healthcare plans on the individual market that don’t meet those minimum standards and therefore do not qualify for the Affordable Care Act.
Other experts said that most consumers in the individual market will not be able to keep their policies. Nancy Thompson, senior vice president of CBIZ Benefits, which helps companies manage their employee benefits, says numbers in this market are hard to pin down, but that data from states and carriers suggests “anywhere from 50 to 75 percent” of individual policy holders will get cancellation letters. Kansas Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger, who chairs the health committee of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, says that estimate is “probably about right.” She added that a few states are asking insurance companies to cancel and replace policies, rather than just amend them, to avoid confusion.
A spokesman for America’s Health Plans says there are no precise numbers on how many will receive cancellations letters or get notices that their current policies don’t meet ACA standards. In both cases, consumers will not be able to keep their current coverage.
Those getting the cancellation letters are often shocked and unhappy.
Ron Johnson is proposing a bill — which the House will take up — making “if you like your plan you can keep it,” a promise made on countless occasions by the President and well documented in both audio and video form as part of his push to sell the law that still remains incredibly unpopular with the American public, into law, effectively killing ObamaCare by denying it the necessary enrollment to fund what is, at base, a health insurance welfare system based around wealth redistribution and client favoritism.
As a result, it won’t pass — and will show those Americans with their eyes open just how far the Democrats (and some Republicans) are willing to go to make sure this monstrosity of governmental power and revenue gets set in place institutionally.
The President lied. Those who backed him lied — or else were misled. Some are calling Obama out, now that they’ve seen what is actually happening. Others, though, are doubling down, telling us that what we heard Obama say isn’t really what he said — that Obama meant you can keep your health insurance coverage and your doctors, just not specifically: instead, he meant you will be eligible for his insurance plans, and, provided your greedy doctors didn’t turn on you, there’s no reason to believe they wouldn’t be there for you, too.
Those people have no shame, no scruples, and are in the business now of protecting their egos from the huge lesson it should be learning about who it believed and what led it to do so.
That, too, is no shocker. In fact, it’s as entirely predictable as was ObamaCare’s inevitable failure to meet any of the promises made in its sales pitch.
The President lied. Those who backed him lied — or else were misled. –
“Misled” lets them off the hook. I’m not willing to do that.
They :
Were “lied” to
Ignored any information contradictory to the Unicorn pipe-dream
Accused the opposition of racism.
If you know anything at all about the health insurance market, you knew in 2010 that O-care was unsustainable without getting those with prior private policies into the system. If you take those with employer provided health insurance away, the only people you have left are a) those without coverage because of problems; b) those without coverage because they’re young and don’t need it; and c) those who are privately insured. You must have the latter two groups to pay for the first group. Thus the mandate for the younger generation and regulations to eliminate prior policies for those who’ve been responsible enough to have them. Actuarial reality necessitates this. It was only a matter of time.
OBAMA LIED, HEALTHCARE DIED!
Again with the impossibility that the regime — merely by taking on a form or appearance as a regime — teaches anything to those over whom the regime stands as a regime: for how now if the people learn that the ends justify the means? Why, any manner of [formerly untoward] acts against the regime itself might come to light as perfectly justified by the ends for which those acts are undertaken.
Which, that just can‘t be.
Why does that sound so familiar? Hmm…
Shermlaw, I think we call that a master bait-and-switch.
If you listen carefully, you can hear all of the liberals singing:
“If I listened long enough to you
I’d find a way to believe that it’s all true
Knowing that you lied, straight-faced, while I cried
Still I look to find a reason to believe.”
And the law and its regulations were written to destroy private policies. That is, in 2010, insurance companies had to change their policies to comply with certain portions of the ACA. But it is those very changes which, under the regulations, prevent such policies from being “grandfathered in.” This was planned from the beginning.
And BTW, the purpose is in no way to provide increased access to affordable health care. The purpose is to throw roadblocks into obtaining healthcare by way of outrageous deductibles and out of pocket expenditures. This enables the government to keep more of the 1/6 of the economy heretofore spent by Americans on health expenditures, in order to parcel that money out to cronies.
The biggest shocker is that many folks seemed genuinely shocked that a law that was not debated, then deemed passed without having been read in its entirety by anyone, has upon implementation been found to be somewhat if not fully fault ridden.
It’s a law, not scripture.
I get so fucking sick of the “law of the land!” crowd.
I like to point out that the Dred Scott decision was the “law of the land” too.
Volstead Act. Fugitive Slave Act. The beat goes on.
Speed limits are the “law of the land,” as well. So is the drinking age. I just hope our young Americans give as much respect to the “individual collective responsibility payment” as they do to so many others.
…a law, certain parts of which, the current administration can alter via decree or scepter wave.
Prop 8 was the law of the land.
What did they know (Obamacare is a pack of lies) and when did they know it (since before its inception)?
Fool’s Overture
[…] Protein Wisdom: SHOCKER: “Obama administration knew millions could not keep their health insurance” […]
WSJ weighs in on Ocare outrage.