This time, from Daniel Pritchard, alerting me to a piece by “journalist” Sarah Hill, writing in the Boston Review Blog, “Ted Cruz’s Castro Complex”
Writes an apparently quite self-satisfied Mr Pritchard:
Good afternoon!
Online today at the Boston Review Blog, journalist Sarah Hill writes of Ted Cruz’s Castro Complex, “the disorder in which a professed hatred of Castro belies a perversely flattering fixation on Castro’s political genius, and in Cruz’s case, a notable imitation of Castro’s flamboyant governance gimmicks.”
http://www.bostonreview.net/blog/hill-cruz-castro-complex
As Hill points out, Fidel never made so much as a dent in global capitalism through decades in power. Ted Cruz nearly wrecked it in a matter of weeks.
Enjoy,
Daniel
—
Daniel E. Pritchard
Boston Review
Marketing & Publicity Director
(617) 324-1325
www.bostonreview.net
My reply was dashed off rather quickly, but I think it properly captures the essence of what I’m feeling today about the children who are running our country and who, in a rather surreal irony, have managed to convince themselves that they are the only real adults left. It’s Freaky Friday gone entirely viral.
Dear Mr Pritchard,
This is, as a supposed example of “journalism,” absurd, obscene, and opportunistic. I am not one the editors for your journal, but were I, one of the first things I’d do is make certain that any of my writers attempting to write on capitalism, debt ceiling debates, “default,” or anything relating to a constitutional stance in defense of our liberty and individual sovereignty, first show a passing familiarity with these subjects as they truly exist and not simply rehash demonstrably false talking points fed them by a government to whom they’ve prostituted themselves; and second, I would expect that before one of my writers launched into pseudo-psychiatric speculation of others’ motivations, those writers would first look to themselves and correct any of their own mental deficiencies — as in this particular instance, Ms Hill’s desire to join in the manufactured wilding of an extraordinarily intelligent and honorable man in order to win easy approbation from the herd of dull, predictable, and frankly repugnantly needy lemmings so eager to follow a progressive cult of personality into the very kind of authoritarian state she here projects is brought about by the principled actions of a few actual representatives of the people who are trying to wrest back control of government from a professional ruling class and it’s attendant cronies and media enablers, all of who live like mewling infants clinging desperately to the government tit.
And that’s not to pick solely on Ms Hill. She is just one of many, representing both mainstream political parties, who have taken this route, and who believe that in their mutual consent they will find professional approval and reflect an intellectualism they neither possess nor could ever earn so long as they rely solely for their ideas on their pimps, who have no problem wielding the bitch hand when one of these upppity whores dare steps out of line.
Hope that helps,
Jeff
Pearls before swine, my friend. He’s a “Marketing & Publicity Director” for some pretend-intellectual virtual rag I’d never even heard of. And the fact that I’d never heard of these idiots leads me to conclude that this asshole isn’t even a good Marketing & Publicity Director.
“Political genius”? The guy who picked the wrong side in the 70 Years War?
Okay.
It’s frightening that people are dumb enough to believe global capitalism won’t be damaged by the eventual shipwreck of the American economy through rampant debt.
mostly we learned a lot about the fascist whores who work for the National Park Service
other than that this was sort of a snooze, this shutdown thing
Capitalism is what happens when the government leaves the people alone. I miss those days.
Ironically enough, so is prosperity.
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as “bad luck.”
What a priceless response, Jeff.