Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

as a CITIZEN journalist, I feel compelled to offer this confession:

The reports you have no doubt heard by now are correct: I did in fact agree to meet off the record with myself, having been invited by me to an informal gathering where I was assured I’d be given the freedom to talk to myself with complete candor. And, after what was a rather unexpectedly pleasant and even at times charming experience — it turns out I can be quite a down to earth fellow, in those times when I’m not forced to keep my guard up against myself! — I concluded, along with me, that I can get along just fine with myself, and can even find some common ground to act as a united front against those who aren’t me and who wish me to be something other than myself.

The secret to this arrangement, which is what’s best for the country, both I and me decided, is figuring out a coherent narrative that we would both stick to, while agreeing — off the record — to follow a singular, bi-me strategy, emphasized by the need for me to get together with mysefl to hash out any differences I may have with myself in order to end the public friction between myself and me.

Privately, however, we get along swell — and I can really see myself having a few beers with me when the day ends and policy talk gives way to talk about how best to manage all those who aren’t me.*

So all in all: success!

— that I say that off the record, naturally.

51 Replies to “as a CITIZEN journalist, I feel compelled to offer this confession:”

  1. Drumwaster says:

    So we can expect things to actually improve, now that you have agreed with your general goals, in an informal kind of way, and totally bullet-proof should anyone ask, even my priest or in front of a grand jury?

    Just for the record.

  2. serr8d says:

    Your linky is blinky. But, being me, I figured out it goes here. Yay, me~!

  3. BigBangHunter says:

    – The return of the Squishies
    © : Chapter 2013.

  4. newrouter says:

    >The return of the Squishies<

    i like it. shutdown theater can continue with nps starring.

  5. BigBangHunter says:

    – Can we get a refund: The CommieCrats dream.

    – Even the Taliban are laughing at our Clown disaster lead-from-behind-in-chief now.

  6. newrouter says:

    eric erickson
    Conservatives need to push the debt ceiling fight off the front burner to after Christmas.

    Republican Leaders are begging us to merge the continuing resolution fight and debt ceiling fight. They covet this with all their mind and heart.

    They do not want a stand alone fight on Obamacare. They want to conflate it with the debt ceiling so they can do a grand bargain and leave Obamacare alone.

    Consider Rep. Paul Ryan’s op-ed in the Wall Street Journal. He wants a grand bargain and not once mentions Obamacare. Not once.
    link

  7. leigh says:

    Is it just me or does Sarah Hall Ingram look like Karl Rove’s twin sister?

  8. BigBangHunter says:

    – Actually she could almost pass for Rove’s brother.

  9. sdferr says:

    Looks like the Park Service should go away with the IRS. Competitive private contracts for a diminished national park system can step to the fore, while States can tend to greater control of their own lands. Bugger the goddamned bureaucracy.

  10. BigBangHunter says:

    – So now we know that the MB has something on Bumblefuck that undoubtedly leads back to Benghazi, now that he’s cut them another break with the military aid denial to Egypt.

    – I’m guessing when this is all over honest historians, you know, the ones that will be back in vogue once the Red Progressive threat is destroyed, will have many decades of books to write recording the many unlawful and traitorous acts of Bumblefuck and the politoboro.

  11. leigh says:

    You’re right. I was trying to be kind, BBH.

  12. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Who are these honest historians you speak of? And will they be writing these books in Chinese, Russian or Newspeak?

  13. newrouter says:

    the ones that will be back in vogue once the Red Progressive threat is destroyed,

    diane west waves

  14. Pablo says:

    Is it just me or does Sarah Hall Ingram look like Karl Rove’s twin sister?

    She looks like a Phelps of the Westboro persuasion.

  15. leigh says:

    She does, Pablo.

    Thanks. I think.

  16. palaeomerus says:

    “She looks like a Phelps of the Westboro persuasion. ”

    Ah yes, the Innsmouth look.

  17. newrouter says:

    settled baseball pit 1 stl 6

  18. sdferr says:

    Is it just me or does Sarah Hall Ingram look like Karl Rove’s twin sister?

    I get a Ben Franklin vibe off the shot Drudge is running.

  19. newrouter says:

    interesting

    Overnight Open Thread (10-9-2013)

    More From Vaclav Havel’s 1978 Essay, “The Power of the Powerless”

    In which he lays out what it means to be a ‘dissident’, how to live ‘within the truth’ and ways
    to resist a totalitarian system even when you have no power at all.

    link

  20. dicentra says:

    If Jeff went on Mark Levin, I bet he could obfuscate, interrupt, barf up Boehner/McConnell talking points, be defensive and petulant, and act like an Even Bigger Jackass than Senator Ron Johnson did today.

    Painful to hear, it was. The man sounded exactly like a Formerly Honest Man Who’d Been Compromised.

  21. SBP says:

    “Ah yes, the Innsmouth look.”

    I don’t do this very often: LOL!

  22. newrouter says:

    @dicentra
    potpl page 127
    The fact that the establishment gave the task of
    defending its positions to the usual political and journalistic hacks
    was probably a case of Hobson’s choice in an emergency, but it
    gained it nothing and was just one further error, since those gentlemen’s
    standards are notorious. As could be expected, they immediately
    brought into play against the Charter a whole set of slanders,
    distortions, abuse, half-truths and absolute falsehoods which all
    represent the dismal range of their capacity. Ispeak from experience
    as one who has been a favourite target for their sort of behaviour for
    the past thirty years, and who could well lay claim to the laurels of
    seniority and worthy service. Though the powers that be may not
    know it, or rather, would sooner not know it, nay, cannot afford to
    know it (for where else would they find more obedient, unscrupulous
    and servile creatures), the media are the principal, albeit
    unintentional, creators and encouragers of opposition, since they
    are totaJIy suspect and nobody believes them. People almost automatically
    take for gospel the opposite of what the papers say. Once
    all-powerful, the media were capable of pointing the finger that
    condemned people to death. As they lost all credibility they also lost
    some of their power, and at the very least were obliged to change
    their methods, if not their ends. Nowadays, they do not directly fix
    the noose around people’s necks, but they do endeavour to destroy
    their honour and slay them with a hail of repeated slanders and lies,

  23. bour3 says:

    Sarah Hall Ingram, never hoid ov’er, but my patriot heart was warmed immediately I trusted her because I’m convinced she’s direct descendent of Benjamin Franklin.

  24. SBP says:

    There’s some crap floating around Facebook about how the Princes of Darkness Koch brothers are supposedly selling dollar-denominated assets short. Never mind that their family got rich by making actual stuff, not currency speculation, and that their business consist almost exclusively of making stuff to this day.

    George Soros, of course, would never dream of doing anything like that.

  25. newrouter says:

    @ page 127 potpl

    In Czechoslovakia the right to work means that renowned
    surgeons or violinists may be forced to make a living at manual
    labour and still count themselves fortunate that they can at least
    earn their keep that way. If surgeons or violinists do practise their
    real professions, they are not exercising a right, but enjoying a privilege
    that can be denied them at any time. In the course of the 1960s,
    only those against whom this elementary rule of totalitarianism was
    used were aware of its full extent, whereas in the 1970s everyone
    knows it, including children.
    Working at one’s real profession was very probably made a privilege
    that can be denied the disobedient because otherwise there
    would be nothing left to take away from people. The levelling of the
    living standard has gone so far that everyone is in the same boat and
    the totalitarian power must therefore endow even the most natural
    social functions with the qualities of privilege.

  26. newrouter says:

    But he said there should be no cause for worry because as long as they have the power to tax, they could always take away from the people whatever they needed to bail them out of trouble. And they’re doing just that.

    link

  27. palaeomerus says:

    “Sarah Hall Ingram, never hoid ov’er, but my patriot heart was warmed immediately I trusted her because I’m convinced she’s direct descendent of Benjamin Franklin. ”

    Well, Ben did write a quasi-scientific pamphlet about how much he enjoyed a good fart every now and then. It was written to poke fun at his French hosts for inviting him to a ‘write an enlightening pamphlet that examines the universe, life, history, philosophy, or the human condition because you are considered smart and famous, and that’s what us very tony smart people do for our hobby’ party. It was sort of like making fun of pointless vacuous tweets today only more expensive.

  28. BigBangHunter says:

    – Some of the true believers are getting restless.

  29. sdferr says:

    Roger Simon gleefully demonstrates why he cannot be trusted. Sure, some people have heard of Machiavelli, read him even, but still haven’t a clue what he was about.

  30. leigh says:

    Simon isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed.

    We’re surrounded by surrender monkeys.

  31. geoffb says:

    Re: R. Simon.

    Once you buy into any part of the left’s propaganda effort, especially when they go all “politics of personal destruction” then you will be led by your nose down a path which they, the leftists, at least, think will bring them success and power.

  32. sdferr says:

    Listen to Sen. Johnson mistake tactics for strategy. It’s the end, the telos, that these sad people don’t understand: lacking a concept of the end, they can’t possibly find their way out of the thicket of power transfer the progressives have created for them.

  33. leigh says:

    sdferr, I have a question regarding the 14th Amendment, section 4 that I hope you might answer for me. I’ll quote from Wiki (I know, I know) because I read an article that was alarming yesterday and decided to check into it:

    Section 4 confirmed the legitimacy of all U.S. public debt appropriated by the Congress. It also confirmed that neither the United States nor any state would pay for the loss of slaves or debts that had been incurred by the Confederacy. For example, during the Civil War several British and French banks had lent large sums of money to the Confederacy to support its war against the Union.[152] In Perry v. United States (1935), the Supreme Court ruled that under Section 4 voiding a United States bond “went beyond the congressional power.”[153]

    The debt-ceiling crisis in 2011 raised the question of what powers Section 4 gives to the President, an issue that remains unsettled.[154] Some, such as legal scholar Garrett Epps, fiscal expert Bruce Bartlett and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, have argued that a debt ceiling may be unconstitutional and therefore void as long as it interferes with the duty of the government to pay interest on outstanding bonds and to make payments owed to pensioners (that is, Social Security recipients).[155][156] Legal analyst Jeffrey Rosen has argued that Section 4 gives the President unilateral authority to raise or ignore the national debt ceiling, and that if challenged the Supreme Court would likely rule in favor of expanded executive power or dismiss the case altogether for lack of standing.[157] Erwin Chemerinsky, professor and dean at University of California, Irvine School of Law, has argued that not even in a “dire financial emergency” could the President raise the debt ceiling as “there is no reasonable way to interpret the Constitution that [allows him to do so]”.[158]

    The piece I read late last night insisted that O’jughead may seize the ower of the purse from the congress and that there was nothing to be done about it. I say this sounds like a load of nonsense.

    Wjhat say you?

    *My bold in blockquote

  34. leigh says:

    Please excuse typos in the above.

  35. sdferr says:

    Can you link the thing you read leigh?

    Setting the particulars of whatever claim may have been made there aside, there is of course plenty that can be done about it, should TheClownDisaster overreach the Executive powers yet again, albeit in an even more heightened regard. Congress, for instance, can begin immediate impeachment proceedings. Some determined individual actor might look to the motto of the State of Virginia.

  36. geoffb says:

    O’jughead may seize

    May he do so?

    He has shown that he “may” do anything that comes into his head, illegal, legal, constitutional, unconstitutional, since with Reid and the MSM in hand no ill effects can come to him from whatever the House does.

    Will some foolish souls buy the bonds so made available for sale?

    Let us hope that all the billionaires, multimillionaires, on the left do so with all their resources. When the result comes down that the bonds are worthless paper they can all go live under that “bridge too far” together.

  37. leigh says:

    Here is the link to the piece and a video. It’s very short and lacks detail.

  38. geoffb says:

    A few pieces on the 14th and the debt limit, here, here, here, here, here.

  39. leigh says:

    Thanks, geoff. I’ll go read.

  40. sdferr says:

    leigh, take a look at Hinderaker’s recommendation. Looks sound to me, which means, in all probability, Boehner and the rest of the surrender caucus won’t follow it.

  41. sdferr says:

    Isn’t it interesting that some obscure vegetable vendor in Tunisia sets himself on fire and the whole Middle-East explodes — that when some American, in possible imitation of that Tunisian guy, sets himself on fire on the National Mall in the shadow of the Washington Monument. . . silence.

    But some other American guy attempts to mow the lawn at the Lincoln Memorial and gets chased off, it’s hubbub kablooey? Does this speak to the lack of lawns in Tunisia, or the superfluity of life in America?

  42. leigh says:

    Well, after reading all that I’m reassured that those advocating the prez seizing congressional power is indeed impeachable.

    That won’t stop him, of course.

  43. leigh says:

    I like that Hinderaker piece. That’s been my position on this nonsense all along. I’m becoming unnerved by the d-bags in the GOP and their slouching toward surrender.

    Hinderaker is more optimistic than I.

  44. leigh says:

    sdferr, interesting that you mentioned the Tunisian and the immolating guy on the Mall. I had said something along those lines when it happened and kept waiting for the newsies to make what seemed an obvious comparison between the two.

    Still waiting . . .

  45. McGehee says:

    I get a Ben Franklin vibe off the shot Drudge is running

    The inventor of the Franklin stove!? That abomination that pumps evil, evil carbon di(abolical)oxide into the innocent atmosphere?????

    Woman needs to lose about three fourths of her weight and cut her hair so she can look like a proper pinch-faced scold.

Comments are closed.