While right wing Islamophobes like Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, FOX News, and American Islamic Forum for Democracy’s Zuhdi Jasser, a Muslim, are busy hating the religion of peace for no particular reason — and engaging in a rhetorical atmosphere that is unfairly hostile to Muslim extremists — Chris Christie has taken a different route, and proven to be a friend to CAIR, the unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land terror trial, and now sensitivity trainers to the FBI!
— Which, I haven’t sat through one of those sessions, but if I had to guess, it might include warnings that any knee-jerk attempts to profile Muslims for things like car bombings or subway bombings or Marathon bombings, etc., is a sign of hate — and a product of years of indoctrination by the Zionist lobby, which controls the media, and whose elders regularly eat the blood of Muslim children by baking it into tarts.
So yes, America is a wasteland of politically correct fuckups climbing over themselves for cheap grace — and Chris Christie is one of those sainted fuckups who now has the imprimatur (along with the likes of Dick Durbin) of CAIR. The unindicted co-conspirators in a terrorism trial / trainers to the FBI / opponents of free speech.
Who, like ACORN, have taken the tack of changing their name, even after its just completed press conference naming the islamaphobes. Probably because these friends of Chris Christie were busted laundering money.
GO Big Tent!
So…CAIR’s new name is WTF [Washington Trust Foundation] – oh, that’s rich.
What does Grover al Traitor have to say about it???
Not that I’m a fan of Christie (I am not), but what exactly did he have to do with any of this? Maybe I’m just missing something?
Bottom of the first link: Christie and Durbin were recently added to CAIR’s official “kafir most likely to pay jizya, and thus won’t need to be killed for Allah… yet” list.
Or something like that.
Well a smaller tent would not contain Christie’s majesty sufficiently. Of course that big tent is looking kind of empty now. But an empty suit can go far in today’s Washington and inevitability is a cinch to gin up once your feet touch Iowa.
Well, they’re fooked. Anytime people see the words “Washington” and “trust” that close together, they know what to expect.
The simultaneous grabbing of wallets and crossing of legs is a sight to behold.
Chris Christie drank all the almond milk
We can easily imagine that Chris Christie is sad he won’t be called to the ribbon-cutting ceremony at the Celebratory-Memorial Mass Murder Mosque in downtown NY, NY., because it isn’t going to be built.
Christie has done things which CAIR likes. Like this and this. Doesn’t mean he works for CAIR but it does make it look like he is easily swayed to their side by their agents of influence.
CAIR’s financing isn’t dependent on domestic sources. Only about 1% of what they say they receive if from followers that live here. Their overseas funders don’t care what the name of the “trust” is only what it does. It is founded as part of the Muslim Brotherhood working/gaming the American civil rights legalities to advance the MB’s world agenda.
The Islamists are following the deep path that the USSR and the CPUSA wore down into the American political system. Founding a myriad of different organizations that look separate but work together, directed at a level that is overseas and unseen by the public. Not trying to run the government but to influence/twist it to serve their end not that of the citizens of the nation.
They’ve done pretty well too. We now side with al Qaeda, arm them, fund them. Our “citizens” participate in terror attacks, most recently in Kenya. The IRS gives them a pass while going after “Tea Party” types.
Our lives are worse because we let a coddled, strategically clueless, marxist agitator and general fuckwipe be president. Twice.
His marketing handlers and true believers have screwed us good and Obama is a good boy and gets a biscuit. Now we just need to throw out coal and tax the shit out of everything else and we can start starving designated undesirables du jour for great social justice.
Then the GOP rolled over for him and ran tired loser dopes against him and kicked out the fire in their own bellies because like dying on hills is like a bummer and the predator totally can’t see you if you stick your head in the sand. Like duh hobbits. Hate you.
The end.
Because rinos love kicking out fires almost as much as rhinos do.
I call them Mensheviks. There aren’t any angry Mensheviks at the wild animal park that might damage my truck for insulting their species.
mitch mcconnell menshevik. at least he is not a bolshevik!
I’m a bit confused, so someone help me out now?
Is Christie the guy slotted to lose to Hillary! in ’16? Because I was sure that was supposed to be Jeb Bush.
In fairness no rhino ever told me that Mitt Romney was inevitable…
Hillary and Jeb are here to protect us from the terrible secret of space, just as soon as the mandatory “stairs in every house” bill passes and is signed into law. Pak chooie unf.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E0ot9iJm_k
Fed-Up NY Man Sets Up Hidden Camera to Find Out Who Was Repeatedly Stealing His Pro-Gun Sign – What He Discovered Blew Him Away
Who are these so-called ‘dissidents’? Where does their point of
view come from, and what importance does it have? What is the significance
of the ‘independent initiatives’ in which ‘dissidents’ collaborate,
and what real chances do such initiatives have of success? Is
it appropriate to refer to ‘dissidents’ as an opposition? If so, what
exactly is such an opposition within the framework of this system?
What does it do? What role does it play in society? What are its
hopes and on what are they based? Is it within the power of the
‘dissidents’ – as a category of subcitizen outside the power establishment
– to have any influence at all on society and the social
system? Can they actually change anything?
I think that an examination of these questions – an examination
of the potential of the ‘powerless’ – can only begin with an examination
of the nature of power in the circumstances in which these
powerless people operate.
One legacy of that original ‘correct understanding’ is a third peculiarity
that makes our system different from other modern dictatorships:
it commands an incomparably more precise, logically
structured, generally comprehensible and, in essence, extremely
flexible ideology that, in its elaborateness and completeness, is
almost a secularized religion. It offers a ready answer to any question
whatsoever; it can scarcely be accepted only in part, and
accepting it has profound implications for human life. In an era
when metaphysical and existential certainties are in a state of crisis,
when people are being uprooted and alienated and are losing their
sense of what this world means, this ideology inevitably has a certain
hypnotic charm. To wandering humankind it offers an immediately
available home: all one has to do is accept it, and suddenly everything
becomes clear once more, life takes on new meaning, and all
mysteries, unanswered questions, anxiety, and loneliness vanish. Of
course, one pays dearly for this low-rent home: the price is
abdication of one’s own reason, conscience, and responsibility, for
an essential aspect of this ideology is the consignment of reason and
conscience to a higher authority.
}Ideology is a specious way of relating to the world. It offers human beings the illusion of an identity, of dignity, and of morality while making it easier for them to part with them. As the repository of something suprapersonal and objective, it enables people to deceive their conscience and conceal their true position and their inglorious modus vivendi, both from the world and from themselves. It is a very pragmatic but, at the same time, an apparently dignified way of legitimizing what is above, below, and on either side. It is directed toward people and toward God. It is a veil behind which human beings can hide their own fallen existence, their trivialization, and their adaptation to the status quo. It is an excuse that everyone can use, from the greengrocer, who conceals his fear of losing his job behind an alleged interest in the unification of the workers of the world, to the highest functionary, whose interest in staying in power can be cloaked in phrases about service to the working class. The primary excusatory function of ideology, therefore, is to provide people, both as victims and pillars of the post-totalitarian system, with the illusion that the system is in harmony with the human order and the order of the universe. . . .
{9}The post-totalitarian system touches people at every step, but it does so with its ideological gloves on. This is why life in the system is so thoroughly permeated with hypocrisy and lies: government by bureaucracy is called popular government; the working class is enslaved in the name of the working class; the complete degradation of the individual is presented as his ultimate liberation; depriving people of information is called making it available; the use of power to manipulate is called the public control of power, and the arbitrary abuse of power is called observing the legal code; the repression of culture is called its development; the expansion of imperial influence is presented as support for the oppressed; the lack of free expression becomes the highest form of freedom; farcical elections become the highest form of democracy; banning independent thought becomes the most scientific of world views; military occupation becomes fraternal assistance. Because the regime is captive to its own lies, it must falsify everything. It falsifies the past. It falsifies the present, and it falsifies the future. It falsifies statistics. It pretends not to possess an omnipotent and unprincipled police apparatus. It pretends to respect human rights. It pretends to persecute no one. It pretends to fear nothing. It pretends to pretend nothing.
In fairness no rhino ever told me that Mitt Romney was inevitable…
In fairness, Mitt was also the far superior alternative to John McAmnestyMcClimateFraud in 2008 as well.
And in 2012, a series of contenders tried to be the “better than Mitt” alternative in the primaries.
But one by one, they imploded, from Rick Perry’s inability to even speak coherently at the debates, to Newt’s skeletons bulging out of his closet, to Ron Paul’s kooky cult of isolationism bordering on anti-Semitism, to Rick Santorum’s uber Catholicism and lack of a war chest. To say nothing of the not-ready-for-prime-time Cain and Bachmann.
Can the true conservatives, libertarians, “classical liberals”, and patriots coalesce around a candidate and give him (or even her) a large enough war chest of funds, and beat the lamestream media demonization?
Some of them were imploded. By the “surely we want only the best for the GOP” media, with help from the Beltway Mensheviks.
Chris Christie’s chum in pandering to the muslims, The Clown Disaster, said today:
*** “Friends of Israel, including the US, must say clearly that its future depends on the creation of a Palestinian state,” Obama told the Assembly.
“The Palestinian people have a right to live in dignity in their own state,” he went on, echoing comments he made during a speech in Jerusalem in March. ***
Wonder when the Palestinians will get around to acting with dignity, behaving like a civilized people? No hurry though, I guess.
Some of them were imploded. By the “surely we want only the best for the GOP” media, with help from the Beltway Mensheviks.
Ok, but that doesn’t change my question, namely, how do we overcome that?
It is all well and good to mock lame candidates for “Winning”, but how do we actually WIN?
Is it “Menshevik” to note when one of our guys missteps? And I know full well that it isn’t fair that their candidates get away with murder when ours get the book thrown at them for jaywalking. I know that already.
“. . . we . . .”
Who are we, exactly?
oh. That’s how.
“. . . we . . .”
Who are we, exactly?
oh. That’s how.
OK, you done figured me out. I’m a RINO infiltrator Menshevik. :-P
How about figuring out a way to actually *win* elections? Or do you want to just bitch? Nothing wrong with that, if it makes us all feel better. Frankly, if it is hopeless, as I have said before, I will just give up and go cry, and figure out a way to retire in the Caribbean.
Well, shit. Maybe the whole electoral process is hopeless, and we need to “go Chilean” and have a coup and overthrow Barack Allende and his neo-marxists, who just have too much electoral support to ever be turned out.
But who would be our American Pinochet? And are the Chicago Boys still there to be heeded?
Or do you want to just bitch?
Without reading futher, may I say that this is both insulting and stupid? Thanks.
How to win friends and influence people!
Yep.
That works just like the interpretations of Sens. Cruz and Lee’s objectives by their opponents we see scattered around the internet or on tv. They don’t bother seeking to figure out what the Sens, are doing, they just proceed with ridiculous assertions about what they’re doing, and then laugh themselves silly skewering their jolly strawmen.
Regard the American people shouting that they don’t want DisasterCare and the miseries it will impose on them? Oh hells no. First the American people have to be made to suffer under it: only then will they know they don’t want it!
Whoa, where did you get the idea I don’t like what Messrs. Cruz and Lee are doing? But I know already what that little shit Mr. Reid is going to do in response, and I am left wondering what the next move is after that.
I also run into all too many fools that *do* want Obamunistcare and still believe it will cost them little or nothing. I wonder what it will take to disabuse them. I am beginning to think the fools deserve what they get, and hard.
Whoa, where did you get the idea I don’t like what Messrs. Cruz and Lee are doing?
I don’t, and didn’t: it was a comparison, from the treatment of Cruz and Lee, to the treatment you gave my question above — Who are we?
The point I hoped to convey with the question is that identities are in motion, great masses of ordinary Americans are slowly awakening to discover they have been robbed (and in large measure, I hope, they will also realize they have no-one but themselves to blame). To the extent this very personal questioning of one’s identity strikes home in individual breasts, politics will either dynamically turn, or not.
Cruz is subtly (perhaps too subtly) explaining that it is not he and his fellows (Rand, Lee) who are seeking to defund the government, that it is the choice of Harry Reid to either adopt the bill as written by the House or to strip the language from the House bill and risk a government shutdown.
Clearly, the ball is in Reid’s court. If he strips the bill, the House will not vote for it. If he leaves the language in, Obama will veto it.
Either way, the Rinos and America haters are flushed from their holes and on record for all to see.
Check and mate, bitches.
That isn’t really the right question. The question is, what do we want to accomplish?
Once that is answered, then we assess the landscape and determine what strategies are unavailable — having eliminated those, we have usable options.
Is “overcom(ing) that” really necessary to achieving our objectives? I really don’t think so.
That isn’t really the right question. The question is, what do we want to accomplish?
Obamunistcare stopped?
Real cost saving market reforms in health insurance?
Real Republicans / patriots / Classical liberals elected in 2014, unseating Commiecrats and RINO sellouts?
I thought we all agreed on that….
Is “overcom(ing) that” really necessary to achieving our objectives? I really don’t think so.
Sorry, but those media apparatchiks need to be overcome. And grounded and pounded.
Filibuster in progress. C-SPAN, gang.
A pleasanter note: Faure, Dolly Suite.
Sweet, indeed!
However much I and everyone here may sympathize, that is a side issue.
There is a difference between an objective and a laundry list.
To get the list done takes organizing and prioritizing the items; the one that ends up at the top of the list is The Objective.
The republicans and the tea party types both need to compare their pareto diagrams! (Even though I am not a big believer in 80/20 theory. It sounds like industry fad claptrap with a thin veneer of SCIENCE!(TM) to me.)
There is a difference between an objective and a laundry list.
To get the list done takes organizing and prioritizing the items; the one that ends up at the top of the list is The Objective
It IS in that order, priortized.
However much I and everyone here may sympathize, that is a side issue.
Oh no, it isn’t. It is all about The Narrative. About controlling the language.