Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Pwned! Putined! [Darleen Click]

putined

Victor Davis Hanson on Putin’s letter in the New York Times

If it were regrettable that Vladimir Putin’s formidable diplomatic skills were wasted squashing rather than ensuring freedom inside Russia, it seems even more lamentable that his impressive prose likewise is not put to better use. Putin’s letter to us, the American people, is brilliant sophistry. The best rhetoric is always that which blends truth with half-truth and occasional fiction. In Putin’s case, he did all that—while offering the dessert of channeling Obama back to Obama. […]

After calling the U.S. secretary of state a “liar” and “pathetic,” only someone as brazenly confident in his mellifluousness as Vladimir Putin could write, “My working and personal relationship with President Obama is marked by growing trust.”

Putin ends with another flourish in lecturing the U.S. in response to Obama’s pleas that America is always exceptional in its concern for stopping atrocities abroad:

And I would rather disagree with a case he made on American exceptionalism, stating that the United States’ policy is “what makes America different. It’s what makes us exceptional.” It is extremely dangerous to encourage people to see themselves as exceptional, whatever the motivation. There are big countries and small countries, rich and poor, those with long democratic traditions and those still finding their way to democracy. Their policies differ, too.

Where have we heard something like this before?

Putin, I think, is reminding us that it was largely from Barack Obama himself. “I believe in American exceptionalism, just as I suspect that the Brits believe in British exceptionalism and the Greeks believe in Greek exceptionalism,” said our president. Like Obama here, Putin too believes that everyone is about the same, both democracies and perhaps those like Syria (and Russia?), which Putin might be thinking of when he says that they too “are still finding their way to democracy.”

Putin saves the best for last. As the man who ended the Chechnyan war on rather tough terms, he now assumes the role of a campus-diversity czar: “We are all different, but when we ask for the Lord’s blessings, we must not forget that God created us equal.”

Ask a Russian critic of Putin if there is such concern for respecting differences inside Russia.

So what to make of Putin?

He is J. R. R. Tolkien’s melodic and fatherly Saruman come alive.

44 Replies to “Pwned! Putined! [Darleen Click]”

  1. sdferr says:

    A (scary) comment on the naked emperor.

  2. sdferr says:

    I suppose that might include the 2008 Russian use of force over Ossetia.”

    heh

  3. Garym says:

    Very nice Darleen!

  4. geoffb says:

    Putin points out that the U.N. might suffer the same fate as the League “if influential countries bypass the United Nations and take military action without Security Council authorization.”

    It should always be remembered that pwn-ing the USA was baked into the UN DNA right from the beginning by the selection of who was to be our representative and “Secretary General” at the “United Nation’s Charter Conference.” Mr. “Ales” gave his all for the country to which he had given is allegiance and they still profit from his work and the building of the fiction of there being an “International Community”.

  5. Libby says:

    Putin’s recent treatment of Obama is unbelievably embarrassing.
    Do you think he and his staff even understand how much Putin is toying with them at this point?
    I know that Obama is OK with America no longer being a super-power (since it seems that was his goal), but he may not have factored in that shrinking America’s impact also dwarfs his power. Such a fool.

  6. Squid says:

    Do you think he and his staff even understand how much Putin is toying with them at this point?

    Because Teh Won cannot do anything in retribution to the grievous insult, He will pretend it never happened. It is the only way He can maintain His belief that He is loved everywhere and always.

  7. bgbear says:

    at least Putin didn’t call Obama a socialist.

  8. sdferr says:

    Do you think he and his staff even understand how much Putin is toying with them at this point?

    How could they? I mean, with what faculties, capacities or equipment would they even begin? They don’t seem to possess the tools, so it just doesn’t seem possible.

  9. Libby says:

    Must be especially difficult for him to comprehend Putin’s disrespect & condescension given that Obama gets nothing but teenage crush-level adoration from everyone who matters to him.

  10. […] News, protein wisdom, CNN, Firedoglake, The Hill, The Daily Caller, National […]

  11. “Whom do you serve?”

  12. dicentra says:

    Sweet gfx, Darleen, though also a bit unnerving.

  13. It seems backwards, the guy with no clothes should be Putin as Obama’s reflection.

    Plenty of topless Putin photos out there, so get to it. Chop, chop.

  14. Ouroboros says:

    … and that leaves us with Grima Wormtongue as president.. Perfect.

  15. Pablo says:

    Aaaaaand…..again.

    Assad: We’ll start handing over our chemical weapons when the U.S. stops arming Syria’s rebels

    “When we see the United States really wants stability in our region and stops threatening, striving to attack, and also ceases arms deliveries to terrorists, then we will believe that the necessary processes can be finalized,” he was quoted as saying in an interview with Russian state television.

  16. Bill Quick says:

    Putin may be Saruman, but Obama is sure as hell no Gandalf. More like Radagast the Uselessly Brown.

  17. Darleen says:

    charles

    but O! is absolutely convinced he is clothed — and underneath those staid navy blues is golden raiment spun by heavenly angels out of unicorn wool while singing sweet sweet praises.

  18. ThomasD says:

    More like Radagast the Uselessly Brown.

    Or Phil, the Prince of Insufficient Light.

  19. McGehee says:

    I’m with Ouroboros — the <edit> Clown </edit> Disaster is Wormtongue.

  20. newrouter says:

    baracky needs his bicycle helmet

  21. Neo says:

    Saw a man with the jinx in the third degree
    From trying to deal with people–people you can’t see
    Take away, take away, this house of mirrors
    Give away, give away, all the souvenirs
    We’re all in the same boat ready to float off the edge of the world
    The flat old world
    The street is a sideshow from the peddler to the corner girl
    Life is a carnival–it’s in the book
    Life is a carnival–take another look

  22. I sort of see the OFA/OWS/SEIU as the legions of Uruk-hai.

  23. Sort of OT, I’m using Firefox to browse but I cannot login in to comment here using Firefox. I have to go back to IE to be able to login and comment. It sucks.

    Anybody know what I’m doing wrong or how to fix it?

  24. sdferr says:

    Using firefox too charles, and just logged out and logged back in as per usual, so . . . . I’m guessing it ain’t the browser or the website. Sorry I couldn’t help any better.

  25. newrouter says:

    maybe your add-ons are blocking stuff?

  26. sdferr says:

    DiploMad, doing splendidly what a proper diplomad does:

    *** To confirm that things must not be going well for John “Xmas in Cambodia” Kerry we see a press account which reports how Kerry has had to emphasize that the negotiations over Syria are “no game.” It is, indeed, a sad day when the US Secretary of State has to plead to be taken seriously. But, my friends, what else could this disaster of a SecState expect? What about the Obama/Clinton/Kerry “policy” re Syria should be taken seriously? Not much–except that Obama and his two hapless Secretaries of States haven’t a clue about how the world works, how to project American power and defend American interests. Putin certainly has realized that. ***

  27. Darleen says:

    Firefox here and have had no issues.

  28. Blake says:

    Darleen, think you could come up with Putin’s arm pointing at Obama’s genitals while laughing?

    Considering how easily Putin emasculated Obama…..

    Anyway, great job, Darleen, love the images.+

  29. Thanks for the help, login seems to work, but every time I get back to PW it keeps telling me I have to login. I may uninstall and reinstall Firefox. I’m past enjoying the geek shit.

  30. Drumwaster says:

    OT, but Missouri came within a single vote of getting the 2/3 necessary in the State Senate, and gained more than enough in the Assembly, making it only 10 overridden vetoes this year (the previous high water mark was 3, set in ’03), and the media is spinning this as a BIG WIN for the Dem governor…

    http://news.yahoo.com/dem-gov-wins-big-vetoes-gop-legislature-202449550.html

  31. happyfeet says:

    McCoward says Obama’s Syria policy is teh hawt but normal people can’t be bothered.

    These clowns have no credibility when they talk about the middle east anymores. They need to practice stepping on their dick in the middle east on someone else’s fucking dime for awhile is the sum total of my opinion.

  32. happyfeet says:

    i checked the manual it says they on their fucking own

    buenos suerte momos

  33. leigh says:

    Darleen, think you could come up with Putin’s arm pointing at Obama’s genitals while laughing comment

    He is laughing and pointing . . .

  34. geoffb says:

    Redline, redline, who’s had the redline.

    Hillary made it political, Obama made the political, personal.

  35. sdferr says:

    If Stanley Kurtz analyses correctly, and the doctrine under which The Clown Disaster operates does in fact originate in Samantha Power’s formulation of a humanitarian altruism first and foremost, with national interest taking the hindmost precisely to demonstrate the purity of her intention (and therefore, the nation’s), then we can see why The Clown Disaster would be so utterly out of tune with the Americans (and obviously, he is).

    But while that suggestion can account for a great portion of the collapsing pseudo-strategic confusion we see before us, it cannot account for the complete backwardness of the procedures taken.

    The Clown Disaster, for instance, could rather easily have pressed a great diplomatic campaign in the UN and with our allies three years ago to corral and remove Al-Assad’s mass destruction weapons. It can’t be claimed in excuse that The Clown Disaster did not know such weapons existed in Al-Assad’s hands.

    But he did not until after the fact of his ultimatum.

    The Clown Disaster could have easily devoted his time and attention to bringing in full his case against the Al-Assad regime to the nation three years ago, along with any color of threat to the Americans, in order to persuade them to back his diplomatic efforts and coalition building against Al-Assad’s mere possession of mass destruction weapons (which was also not undertaken) for the purpose of the prevention of the potential of Al-Assad using his mass destruction weapons on anyone.

    But he did not until after the fact of his ultimatum.

    Everything backwards. Why?

    (And sure, we can forward all manner of pointless answers to this question: he’s stupid, he’s foolish, he’s autocratic, he’s a fraud, etc. But what would be a purposeful answer, one which supposes axiomatically that The Clown Disaster had something in mind to guide his seeming carelessness, if there is one?)

  36. palaeomerus says:

    I’m sorry but Clown Disaster sounds like an all girl roller skating ska band or something.

  37. McGehee says:

    I see your point, palaeo — far too manly an association for the Obamarrhoids…

  38. sdferr says:

    And?

  39. palaeomerus says:

    I think of him as Zero Fett. Everyone talks about how cool he is and fears him and then a blind guy accidentally knocks him into a pit and that’s it.

  40. palaeomerus says:

    Or maybe he’s the blind guy and the whole US has been knocked into the monster pit.

  41. Drumwaster says:

    I’m sorry but Clown Disaster sounds like an all girl roller skating ska band or something.

    Agreed. But I still don’t see the problem with referring to the Charlie-Fox currently at #OccupyResoluteDesk as such. At least the ska band would have helped improve the economy.

    (If it were mere incompetence, he would be right every once in a while.)

  42. sdferr says:

    FoxTrot?

    But, as has been established, he skates. And with his pockets filled with public monies.

  43. geoffb says:

    From “Statement by Ambassador Samantha Power

    All attacks on civilians are an outrage that should shock the conscience. We must also recognize that the use of chemical weapons crosses a line. These weapons are particularly grotesque, efficient, and indiscriminate. Their use can’t be reconciled with basic principles of humanity that apply, even in wartime. And their proliferation poses a correspondingly high risk to international peace and security, but, more concretely, to citizens in all countries. When the norm is violated, as it was on August 21, the violation cannot go unanswered, unless we are willing to see these weapons used again. And on this my government has spoken clearly: we are not.

    The consensus reached in September 2005 should not be code for necessitating military intervention. But R2P is a doctrine for prevention.

    It should have compelled Assad to protect his people rather than attack them, and it should have compelled his partners in the international community to step in earlier, lend advice and assistance, and prevent the situation from reaching its current metastatic proportions. It should have. Clearly, it is the understatement of the year to say we still have work to do.

    In the area of prevention there is much we can do. To offer some examples, we can prioritize atrocity prevention at the national level. For R2P to mean anything, governments must go beyond their general support for the World Summit outcome document and make it clear—from the Head of State downward—that the protection of civilians is a priority. This focus for us has clarified—this leadership by President Obama has clarified—the way in which we have worked to meet crises, from the Kivus to Rakhine State in Burma.

    Governments can organize to make sure that all of our national capabilities—diplomatic, development, financial, justice, and defense—are being honed and used to best effect in the service of atrocity prevention. Much has been made of President Obama’s Atrocity Prevention Board, but it is simply a high-level vehicle to press the rest of the government to help ensure we are working to deploy the full range of preventative tools we have to ensure civilians are protected.

    We can multilateralize our efforts. As I noted earlier, R2P recognizes that the prevention of atrocities is a matter of international concern. That’s why the recently adopted Arms Trade Treaty, which will help prevent the illicit flow of arms to atrocity perpetrators, is so important. It’s why peacekeeping missions should have the training and mandates they need, and it’s why we each need to support the UN Secretariat—including our dynamic colleague, UN Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide, Adama Dieng. Given the important role that UN mediation capacity plays, I am pleased that the Friends of Mediation, which the U.S. recently joined, will be meeting at the ministerial level on the margins of the General Assembly opening session to advance support for this critical function.

    In conclusion, these are just three ideas—prioritize, organize, multilateralize—but for my government, they have provided an important place to start. I know your governments have your own approaches, and I look forward to hearing about and learning from them. The international consensus around R2P remains a signal achievement of multilateral cooperation and a testament to our common humanity. But as we share ideas, there is one thing on which I hope we can all agree: we have a great deal of work to do. The important framework that the Outcome Document created in 2005 remains more aspirational than it is real. Eight years and countless innocent lives later, we are the ones who have a responsibility to make it real.

    Always remember and never forget just how this cake was assembled and baked, by who, and for what purpose. That purpose snakes through the world like a main circuit cable plugged straight into progressive socialist tyranny. To steal from an old movie.

    All the ideas around R2P speak of what governments are to do for the people. Positive rights. If they were serious about protecting people from atrocities, most of which are done by governments and other organized gangs of thugs, then the right of the people, worldwide, to keep and bear arms would be the priority so that each individual, each family, could have the R2P themselves, themselves.

Comments are closed.