Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Boehner won’t defund ObamaCare; keeping government running his primary objective

So, you know, fuck us.

National Review [my emphasis]:

The House GOP’s conference call last week turned “ugly,” in the words of one Republican on the call, after Speaker John Boehner announced his intention to pursue a short-term continuing resolution to fund the government, hinting it would not use the bill to pick a fight over the implementation of Obamacare.

Representative Lynn Westmoreland of Georgia, one of about a dozen voices who said they were feeling the heat back home, told Boehner to “go back to the drawing board.”

“We hear it in our town halls, we hear it our one-on-one meetings with constituents. We hear it when we’re at county fairs or events we’ve attended during the August recess, of which there are many. And the message all over the country, at least as relayed by members on that phone call, is that this is the overriding issue that is being discussed. Way more than immigration, way more than the debt,” says Representative Cynthia Lummis, who spoke up on the call herself.

Leadership sources say those who spoke up weren’t representative of the entire GOP conference. “We haven’t seen any indication of a broad groundswell,” says a top aide. So far, the division has occurred mainly on the right of the conference, splitting the most hardcore conservatives. In private, many other Republicans are pulling their hair out over the push by Senators Ted Cruz and Mike Lee to use the CR as a do-or-die Obamacare fight.

Really?  Did those same Republicans who don’t see a groundswell and are unhappy at the TEA Party conservatives for doing what they were elected to do somehow miss the 2010 election, then miss the 2012 Presidential election, where the base failed to pretend they were energized over the Party’s insistence that we nominate the architect of what later became ObamaCare?

In a press release, the Center for Individual Freedom didn’t mince words:

National Review is reporting that “Boehner strongly hinted on a conference call with rank-and-file House Republicans that the upcoming continuing resolution will not be a do-or-die fight over Obamacare spending. ‘Our intent is to move quickly on a short-term continuing resolution [CR] that keeps the government running…'”

Don’t be fooled by the Washington weasel-speak. Boehner and others are throwing down the gauntlet, essentially saying to rank-and-file House Republicans: Don’t listen to the pesky demands of the American people… move to defund ObamaCare and you won’t just invite Barack Obama’s wrath… YOU’LL INVITE MY WRATH.

Make no mistake, Boehner is trying to herd cats and is issuing veiled threats precisely because the calls and faxes from patriotic Americans are starting to be heard loud-and-clear in Washington… And now that John Boehner has played his hand, we – the American people – must play ours.

Our elected officials must make a choice, and they need to make it now. Let them know that they can either do what House Leadership wants, or they can do what the American people want and DEFUND OBAMACARE.

There is no longer any question about this:  failure to defund ObamaCare over fears that Reid and Obama will shut down the government and try to blame it on the GOP, who as House majority can continue to pass resolution after resolution funding all other parts of the government, and even allocating funds supposedly earmarked for ObamaCare implementation back to Medicare, from where much of it was stolen, means that the GOP establishment wants ObamaCare, and it is no more “ObamaCare” than it is “StatistCare.”

When a majority leadership can’t make hay out of flawed law that is being selectively and imperially enforced, and that one of its own sponsors has called a “train wreck” — well, let’s just say that they are either impotent, or that there’s some other reason for their reluctance to upset the status quo.

The ruling class vs. the rest of us.

Gee, remember how I was kicked out of polite company for having the willingness to say this — and to lash out at the “pragmatic” GOP rah rah boys who are now suddenly finding their outrage glands still pump, particularly once they can feel the wind blowing a certain way?

I do.  Good times.

 

 

66 Replies to “Boehner won’t defund ObamaCare; keeping government running his primary objective”

  1. dicentra says:

    failure to defund ObamaCare over fears that Reid and Obama will shut down the government and try to blame it on the GOP,

    Levin said that the GOP doesn’t defund O-care because too many of THEIR peeps stand to make big bank on the thing.

    Which, that’s not surprising anymore. The line about “we’re afraid we’ll get blamed” is a bald-faced lie.

    As have been, I reckon, all of the other excuses to not do what we want them to. They did their DURRRR act pretty well, though. It became axiomatic that the GOP is the stupid party instead of the corrupt party.

    But that’s gotta change. Those SOBs can wedge their pious acts up their fingernail beds and leave them there.

  2. William says:

    Nothing else is attempting to blow those rah rah boys.

  3. At some point these representatives will have to decide who they represent — the people of their district of the GOP establishment.

  4. cranky-d says:

    They’ve already decided.

  5. leigh says:

    This is no longer my country. I fold. Give me my winnings and I’ll leave the table now.

  6. eCurmudgeon says:

    Donald Sensing put it in simple terms earlier this month:

    Does this ruling bind this president from doing what he wants to do? Of course not. No one in America has both the power and the determination to hinder Obama from doing whatever he wants.

    As I was discussing Obama’s totalist ideology this week with a relative, I pointed out that Obama could ask a parallel question of the federal courts that Josef Stalin asked when it was suggested to him that he should treat Russian Catholics better to gain favor with the Pope as the Nazi threat loomed: “The Pope!” Stalin exclaimed. “How many divisions has he got?”

    And so with President Obama and federal courts’ rulings: they have no means of enforcing their rulings. As any intemperate two-year old knows, you can do anything you want until someone compels you to stop. And so Obama can order whatever he wishes until he is compelled to stop.

    The courts lacks the means of such compulsion. That leaves the Congress to rein in the executive. (Please excuse me while I erupt in peals of derisive laughter.) Congress’s only authority to rein in a president consists of two things:

    Withhold funding for departments and agencies under executive authority, or
    Impeach him.

    That’s it. (In 1834, the Congress voted to censure President Andrew Jackson. Jackson correctly declared that there was no Constitutional authority for it and basically told the Congress they could either impeach him or get stuffed, although he put it a little more pithily.)

    Since those are the only two options available, and since the Congress is controlled by the Democrats (the Republican majority in the House meaning nothing here), neither loss of funding nor impeachment will ever be used to restrain this president.

    […]

    Obama can do this not because the Constitution or law authorize it. Most definitely they actually prohibit it. He is getting away with it because there is no one who can stop him and almost no one who wants to stop him. No one, and I mean absolutely no one, in the Democrat party is in the slightest interested in reining in Obama’s expansion of executive diktat because they know what few of the rest of us are awakening to: the Democrats are never going to lose that executive authority again. Let me be clear, with a promise to elucidate another day: there is never going to be another Republican president. Ever.

  7. Blake says:

    leigh, what are these “winnings” of which you speak?

    I suspect it’s more a matter of leaving the table before you lose everything.

  8. leigh says:

    I was going with a last burst of optimism, Blake. I’ll wave good-bye to all those FICA taxes now.

  9. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Whatever Obama’s NSA has on Roberts, I’m thinking Boehner is involved.

    Maybe they frequent the same turkish bath house?

  10. Blake says:

    O/T-but, is anyone else as excited as I am at the prospect of war, I mean, “kinetic action,” in Syria? Also, how about Obama ignoring Congress and the War Powers Act and taking decisive unilateral action, as long as the “allies” approve, of course.

  11. Ernst Schreiber says:

    So far, the division has occurred mainly on the right of the conference, splitting the most hardcore conservatives.

    That might be another reason why Boehner’s indifferent. The members most likely to get tossed out by their voters are the ones Boehner wouldn’t miss. The GOP Caucus will be so much easier to manage without the teabaggers.

    Especially if the GOP is in the minority.

  12. cranky-d says:

    Oh, I can hardly wait for the Syrian conflict to begin, Blake, with unilateral action by the prez hisself.

    We really need a protracted war in the Middle East. We have all this money lying around to spend on men and weapons, after all.

  13. charles w says:

    Syria is something to take the heat off of all the other fake scandals.

  14. Blake says:

    cranky, you know what makes the war in Syria really exciting? The prez created the mess, what with running guns and all and has now decided to see if he can create an even bigger mess and, possibly, launch WWIII.

    For some reason, I’m starting to suspect President Pant Crease isn’t all that smart. Call me a rebel, hobit, visigoth, or whatever. I stand by my suspicions.

  15. leigh says:

    I call you observant, Blake.

  16. cranky-d says:

    WWIII FTW!

    Whoohoo!

  17. BigBangHunter says:

    – Yeah, Syria. Over at HuffNPoop (We brave the insanity of the hive mind so you won’t have too) the prog swarm is in denial overdrive. Foodstamps is blowing their anti-war cover so completely they’re not even bothering to Boooosh things up or deal. The “excuses” for Bumblefuck are going from dissonance to incoherent, or visa versa depending on where you start from.

    – But as an aside, could we just stop with the BS and just call it ObamasBoehnerCare™?

  18. McGehee says:

    Representative Lynn Westmoreland of Georgia, one of about a dozen voices who said they were feeling the heat back home, told Boehner to “go back to the drawing board.”

    Well now, I’m glad he said that. Maybe he’s not as assimilated as I was beginning to believe.

  19. Blake says:

    So, anyone interested in a “Dr. Strangelove” marathon?

    Or, is the idea of watching a current documentary on nuclear war too depressing?

    (“Grumpa, what were you doing on the eve of WWIII?” “Well, grandson, Grumpa was making jokes about the possibility of nuclear war.” “Grumpa, not so funny, now, is it?”)

  20. Blake says:

    bbh, only progs could create “incoherent dissonance.”

  21. newrouter says:

    just call it ObamasBoehnerCare™?

    O!boehnercare™

  22. McGehee says:

    I think I’ve reached the point where if there were a nuclear war my reaction would be to sigh and mutter, “Well, crap.”

    Not even, “Well, shit,” or “You maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!”

    Just, “Well, crap.” Like, “All that sweat and energy I spent on yard work yesterday, shot to hell.”

    I just hope if it happens I’ll have more than a swallow or two of Scotch left.

  23. sdferr says:

    Suspect there’s an upsidedown burst of “Eniam eth Rebmemer!” coming over the horizon? It’s hard to recall a more virulent vacuum of aim. The imperious anti-imperial Emperor is on the march sitting in his golfcart, and by god, ready to give away whatever strokes he likes.

  24. Blake says:

    bbh, during your dumpster dive, did you notice anyone comment on the irony of President Peace Prize going to war?

  25. Pop quiz! Who has bombed more countries? Warmonger George W. Bush or Nobel Peace Prize winner Barack Obama?

  26. LBascom says:

    Bonus Question! Bill Clinton; second place or third?

  27. Libby says:

    Well, I don’t recall evil Boosh ever assassinating anyone, while Obama has killed how many now via drone strike? And it’s been acknowledged that they do 1-2 punch strikes where the 2nd strike takes out any people who rush to the scene after the 1st one. Killing first responders: now that there is some peace prize winning kinetic activity!
    ****
    I do wonder if they have something on Boehner, McCain and/or Graham. It could just be that they’ve been in DC so long they’ve gone barn sour – don’t wanna do anything that isn’t approved by their herd of beltway buddies. At this point I doubt they give a rip about future Republican presidents or majorities, they just want to be sure that their own seats are safe & secure; everyone else can just f@$# off.

  28. leigh says:

    Booosh actually axed congress for permission to bomb the living shit out of Iraq first. President Executive Order doesn’t truck with that order of business crap of calling on congress for permission first. He lets others take the flak. Literally.

  29. leigh says:

    Putin isn’t screwing around.

  30. Thaiphoon says:

    Don’t worry…McCain has our backs… at least just enough so he can stab us in them.

    http://www.rollcall.com/news/mccain_explains_hobbit_dig-208248-1.html

    The kicker is he brought out the “hobbits” slam yet again.

  31. leigh says:

    I wish that old fart would buy the farm, already.

  32. serr8d says:

    Protest in front of Boehner’s Troy, OH office: video. One protestor calls a cop a ‘fascist pig’, gets a warning, but no arrest.

  33. newrouter says:

    puty do mecca and medina for the fun

  34. serr8d says:

    – But as an aside, could we just stop with the BS and just call it ObamasBoehnerCare™?

    Sure enough, the newest Twitter hashtag: #BoehnerCare. He’ll own this, certainly, but that’s been his plan all along, to give up just enough wordy ‘opposition’ to generate Party fundraising, but he certainly had no intention to get serious enough to really defund ACA. They caved before they even worked up a sweat.

  35. newrouter says:

    OH 8 – the battle against the 1 party state

  36. newrouter says:

    OH 8 – no demonrat running against orangeman. no repub in orangeman primary. 3rd party now!!11!!

  37. John Bradley says:

    On the “Russia bombing Saudi Arabia if the West attacks Syria” thing: I’m not seeing a downside there.

    Everyone should just pick a middle-eastern country at random and bomb the shit out of it, for the larfs. (Israel excepted, of course.) We’ve been held hostage to the oil-ticks for far too long, and maybe it’s time to remind them that things don’t have to stay that way.

  38. John Bradley says:

    Really? Boehner’s running unopposed?

    Guess the Dems must approve of the fine work he’s been doing, not that that’s news to any of us.

  39. serr8d says:

    The Ohio Republican, speaking at a fundraising event for Idaho Republican Mike Simpson, said he has “made it clear that we’re not going to increase the debt limit without cuts and reforms that are greater than the increase in the debt limit,”

    Lying bastard. They ‘fight’ just like professional wrestlers; they put on a staged show to fool the rubes (allowing them to vent while filling Party coffers), but then they party afterwards backstage, laughing at their ‘supporters’ for believing their practiced lines.

    John “Rhino Frankenstein” Boehner vs. Nancy “Chieftess Harpy” Pelosi, wrassling for the ‘World Champion Heavyweight Mythomaniac’ belt. Just, nevermind; they both have earned and deserve that title a thousand times over.

  40. leigh says:

    On the “Russia bombing Saudi Arabia if the West attacks Syria” thing: I’m not seeing a downside there.

    You’d think do, except we have an agreement to cover the Saudis asses in case of attack.

    This isn’t going to end well.

    On the upside, BillO got his ass royally handed to him by Colonels David Hunt and Ralph Peters who told him he was full of shit and there is no strategic reason to get involved in this at all. Bill looked right gobsmacked. It was beautiful.

  41. newrouter says:

    OH -8 i want a women 45-65 who wants to do orangeguy’s constituents services. the rest not so much.

  42. Ernst Schreiber says:

    OH-8 already has a woman

  43. leigh says:

    Ouch! Good one, Ernst.

  44. Blake says:

    I vote we convene Congress in Saudi Arabia, or Syria, just in time for the bombing to start.

    Either one works for me, I’m not picky.

  45. newrouter says:

    OH-8 already has a woman

    nah a proggtard

  46. BigBangHunter says:

    – Yeah, the Ruski’s would love to put OPAC on a gurney for awhile. They’ve been trying to get an edge in the oil market for decades but prices never sky enough for it to be profitable. A good excuse to put the Saudis on one leg would be welcome.

    – If they do something we’ll have a perfect excuse to close Hormose and drop a few on Irans nuke stuff. I think they won’t. Too much to lose, note enough to gain.

  47. BigBangHunter says:

    – Wonder if Crissy would get a tingle if someone reminded him of this.

  48. StrangernFiction says:

    Their choice is obvious, and conservatives will respond by continuing to vote for the “lesser of two evils.”

  49. EBL says:

    The Orange Dude loves the perks of being Speaker. A secret service detail, jetting around to drum up money for Establishment Republicans, so Boehner’s position is why rock the boat?

  50. I prefer to think of it as the evil of two lessers.

  51. guinspen says:

    “Boehner Vows ‘Whale of a Fight’ over Debt Ceiling”

    “I’ve made it clear that we’re not going to increase the debt limit without cuts and reforms that are greater than the increase in the debt limit,” The Hill quoted Boehner as saying.

    “The president doesn’t think this is fair, thinks I’m being difficult to deal with. But I’ll say this: It may be unfair but what I’m trying to do here is to leverage the political process to produce more change than what it would produce if left to its own devices. We’re going to have a whale of a fight.”

    Indeed.

    Hit it, Kirk.

  52. PCachu says:

    The lesser of two weebls would be bob.

  53. palaeomerus says:

    See I don’t get the blackmail angle.

    If I was Roberts and I was super gay, so gay that gay people were like “nah, I’m not that gay but thanks for asking” and my choice was that news coming out or setting fire to the constitution and making subjects of all Americans then I’d just come out, come clean, and admit that my ass has had so many bones buried in it that it is officially designated a cemetery.

    I’d take the hit.

    I wouldn’t use my position to forge a sparkly little crown for baby Stalin.

  54. RI Red says:

    Nah, paleo, being gay would be a plus. He’d keep his job and be a hero. They have something over Roberts and others that would cause them to lose their jobs, position and place at the cocktail parties.

  55. leigh says:

    I don’t think Roberts is being blackmailed. He has a lifetime appointment and as much as I hate to say it, by declaring the ACA a tax, he moved the ball back in the congress’ court to fix it throw it out. It was actually a pretty cagey move.

    Either he is wicked smaht or it was I’m over-thinking it.

  56. leigh says:

    “I’m” should be “me”

  57. McGehee says:

    Roberts’ move was him outsmarting himself, nothing more. It’s going to be recognized as a pandemic among those inside the Beltway, everybody wanting to be seen as the smartest of the smartest, to the point where they’re constructing traps within feints within dodges within fake-outs within rope-a-dopes.

    In the end it’ll take just one move that is exactly what it looks like, to take it all down.

  58. RI Red says:

    Leigh, that’s lifetime appointment on good behavior. Judges do get impeached, resign, go crazy, etc., see, e.g. “Men in Black” by Levin.
    Anyway, I don’t see him being smart or outsmarting himself. I see a 180 degree turn after the initial majority opinion was written. The legal contortions he went through to reach his tax/penalty decision would have him flunking if it was on a bar exam.
    Regardless, his decision will be held in contempt by surviving constitutionalists of the future. Assuming there are any.

  59. leigh says:

    Certainly the law isn’t my forte, Red. I thank you for helping me understand a bit of what they/he were trying to do. So now what? I still think it, the ACA, falls apart before it ever gets implemented.

    I guess we wait? I know I’m not signing up in October.

Comments are closed.