Probably because their heteronormative cissexism and submission to the White Patriarchy has made them gender-traitors on Womyn’s Health
THE WEEKLY STANDARD: The supporters of these bans, they argue that there really isn’t much of a difference between what happened in that Philadelphia case with abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell [killing born-alive infants] 23 weeks into pregnancy and legal late-term abortions at 23 weeks. What is the difference between those two, between legal abortion at 23 weeks and what Gosnell did? Do you see a distinction between those two [acts]?
SEN. WENDY DAVIS: I don’t know what happened in the Gosnell case. But I do know that it happened in an ambulatory surgical center. And in Texas changing our clinics to that standard obviously isn’t going to make a difference. The state of the law obviously has to assure that doctors are providing safe procedures for women and that proper oversight by the health and human services department is being given. It sounds as though there was a huge gap in that oversight, and no one can defend that. But that’s not the landscape of what’s happening in Texas. […]
TWS: What do you make of polls showing that a majority of women support these late-term bans? There have been a few polls–Washington Post, Huffington Post, different polls–that show women support this. What do you think of those polls?
DAVIS: I again think that a lot of people don’t really understand the landscape of what’s happening in that arena today and what an incredibly small percentage of procedures take place there, but, ah…
Fortunately, we lowly Epsilon-Double-Minuses have people like her to make such decisions for us.
Which, both her and the horse she rode in on. Sideways.
Apologies for going Godwin on all y’all, but, I don’t know what happened and people don’t really understand sound awfully familiar.
Just because you have a vagina doesn’t mean you “have a vagina(TM)” as certified by a real liberal like Jim Moran. Duh. Reality is patriarchal and part of the false consciousness that keeps the workers down.
One of the reasons Godwin is a moron, is that he thinks any comparison to Nazis must be hyperbole.
Even if one blames every single death from WW2 on Hitler, including disease and disruption, and not simply combat, you get a high estimate of about 80 million dead around the world (the lower estimates are 50-60 million). The current number since Roe v Wade is right about 55 million. That doesn’t factor in the number of infanticides (abandoned newborns) and homicides that have occurred as a result of the resulting cultural decay from this enormous devaluation of life.
There is no hyperbole here.
I have to give some grudging kudos to Ann Coulter’s book: Demonic. It has really given me some good perspective into the thought processes of people like Wendy Davis. Unfortunately, it also points out why such minds cannot be swayed .
Unfortunately mob appeals seem to be a guaranteed winner these days.
Actually, no. Godwin’s Law is nearly always misunderstood or misapplied: “As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1.” That refers to discussions where there is no legitimate reason to invoke the “Hitler Card”, just as the “Race Card” is so commonly invoked by racial grievance-mongers when they are losing any sort of debate. If there are genuine comparisons to Hitler or the Nazis to be made, and Kermit Gosnell’s abattoir certainly deserves it, as does Wendy Davis’ laughable claims of ignorance, then Godwin’s Law does not apply.
“People who don’t think exactly like me are ignorant and/or stupid. Which is why I value diversity so much!”
Little wonder these people are incoherent all the time. The cognitive dissonance has to be overwhelming.
“If only those knuckle-dragging, teabagging, guns-and-religion-clinging, hobbity visigoths were smart like me–someone who not only is willfully ignorant of the details of one of the most gruesome courte cases involving abortion in the past decade, but has willingly and seemingly proudly announced my willful ignorance to the world . . .”
They don’t plug their ears and say “Not listening!” only when a conservative or classical liberal speaks. They’ve stopped listening to their own words as well.
I don’t know what happened in the Gosnell case. But I do know that it happened in an ambulatory surgical center.
If you don’t know what happened in that case, how do you know it happened at an ambulatory surgical center, Wendy? Forget about keeping your facts straight from one speech to another – you can’t even keep them straight from one sentence to another.
Seems to be a word missing from her responses: baby (or even the preferred term “fetus”).
I’m sorry the Weekly Standard didn’t spell out more clearly (of follow-up after her dodge), maybe something like, “What is the difference between those two, between legal abortion at 23 weeks and what Gosnell did – delivering the babies before ending their lives?”
i wonder what time pollo loco opens
“Just because you have a vagina doesn’t mean you “have a vagina(TM)” as certified by a real liberal like Jim Moran.”
I hate to pull the mom card, but I’m always amazed when a women who has had children supports late-term abortion. You’ve seen the sonograms and felt the movement from 20 weeks on, so you know damn well that it’s no longer a ‘choice’ or a ‘clump of cells’.
happyfeet says August 6, 2013 at 11:40 am
i wonder what time pollo loco opens
Nothing like Gosnell references to work up an appetite, eh?
The tacos de infantil are my favorite.
Short Answer: Feminism
Not as Short Short Answer: Deliberate and systematic effort to deny nature by portraying it as either a male patriarchal construct (Friedan, et. al.) or as a condition akin to slavery from which Woman must be liberated (Sanger), or both.
I’m with Libby on this and I will wave my Mom Card proudly. I miscarried my first child at four months and that was a baby. Not a puppy. Not a clump of cells. A baby.
I here you, Ernst, but it takes some serious cognitive dissonance to ignore/suppress a 4+ month experience of feeling a living being inside you (I’m not counting the 1st trimester since the physical aspects are about non-baby things like nausea and fatigue). You can’t pretend these are just theoretical entities that don’t exist until they’re born. Above and beyond being able to ignore that Gosnell was killing live, out-of-womb babies (who were breathing, crying, etc.).
argh – hear, not here.
i think when you’re pregnant with a wee small baby a lot of times your final round of tests for abnormalities and such is around 18-20 weeks, so you’d have to make a decision super-fast to sneak in under the wire and get a safe fetus-friendly Rick Perry abortion
I wonder if when faced with a time constraint like that people are more likely to make one choice over another
I know a lot of times at pollo loco if there’s lots of people behind me I’ll just order the plain 8-piece “just chicken” and not get any sides
This way I don’t have to think about which sides have carbs – even though I know in my heart that all of them have carbs and the healthiest choice is to just get the mixed vegetables or maybe a salad if you remember to tell them not to put tortilla strips on it… but if you rush me I just default to no sides. It’s a thing.
also it’s cheaper without the sides and the light-on-the-carbs sides aren’t really a very compelling value if you think about it
What is it about murdered infants that makes you so hungry, vermin?
i think when you’re pregnant with a wee small baby a lot of times your final round of tests for abnormalities and such is around 18-20 weeks…
Citation needed.
I’m always amazed when a women who has had children supports late-term abortion
Just like many of us are confused by how a person can convince themselves that murder is the best solution to a problem. IMHO it is often a matter of too ignorant to know better or being so “clever” that you can convince yourself that you are doing the right thing (see “Crime and Punishment”).
we’re having a contest! I wanna win so bad so yesterday I didn’t really eat any solid foozle.
But this morning I had to go get something cause by mid-morning I just couldn’t focus.
Anyway wish me luck I really wanna win way bad the first prize is a fancy brand new swingline stapler plus you get to pick where to go to lunch and i either wanna go get pancakes at sweet butter or go for mofongo
Citation needed.
here is a citation Mr. Squid, albeit a british one
Sounds about right to me. I used to be a wee small baby myself you know.
I believe your mother is several decades overdue for the scan. Frankly, I think the scan would simply confirm what we all already know to be true.
Happyfeet – I was faced with that decision when, during the initial sonogram appt. at 17 weeks, my kid was diagnosed with multiple heart defects. The time crunch only matters if one will not tolerate an imperfect baby.
I can tell you that I have never once regretted my decision, and it horrifies me now that I spent even a second thinking that it was my choice whether or not to spare him the trauma of the various surgeries or worse.
I get you Libby but I can’t make decisions like that for somebody else it’s really none of my business
happyfeet says August 6, 2013 at 1:35 pm –
I can’t make decisions like that for somebody else
Ahh, irony, considering that is exactly what abortion is…
i don’t say “ahh irony” when you make comments
While you’re researching fetal screenings at pollo loco, look up the rate false positives are returned, will you?
we need more better tests?
nobody tells me anything
The failure, it would seem, is on the listener’s end.
happyfeet says August 6, 2013 at 1:53 pm
i don’t say “ahh irony” when you make comments
That’s because I don’t run my “tolerance” up the flagpole for all to see and (presumably) envy while supporting the “woman’s right” to destroy the unborn for being imperfect (or “just because”; abortion is the ultimate example of being in the wrong place at the wrong time).
Having been through the experience, there were some dark moments when they were running additional tests for things like DiGeorge syndrome, etc. The thing is, there is the potential for health complications throughout one’s life, not just during gestation. Why is it that one can opt for death when it’s detected during pregnancy but not later? I could deliver a healthy kid who is then in a car accident at age 10 and paralyzed, or develop some other permanent health condition. There are no guarantees in life.
So we’ll no doubt get better tests – so what? If you’ve seen Gattaca you get an idea of how being able to detect one’s life expectancy might not be such a gift. As annoying as the claim of “slippery slope!” can be, the underlying premise of aborting defective children is that someone gets to decide how valuable another person’s life is based on imperfect health. And this lead to making those choices in other situations, such as euthanizing seniors, brain injured, etc.
Maybe you don’t want to make that choice, Happyfeet, but we’ve seen in many countries that bureaucrats are more than happy to.
mondamay says August 6, 2013 at 2:06 pm
happyfeet says August 6, 2013 at 1:53 pm
…and another thing, you’re all “mr this and mr that” when it is one-on-one, but you throw out “lifeydoodle”, and other such dreck when you’re not directly engaging anyone, so don’t try to say the disrespect is all one-way.
It’s very simple. They just let the air in Jig. You wouldn’t mind it. I know it.
Davis is an effing idiot.
Sign of the times.
That there is even any room for debate on the issue I mean…
Mr. geoff this confirms about the false positive rate
I wonder what the British people are doing testing at 18-20 weeks
Are there special abnormalities that you have to wait til then to detect?
Mr. mondamay lifeydoodle is an exceedingly respectful and meticulously precise term for Team Life people what are unable or unwilling to separate their religious views from their politics.
And yeah I know there are nonreligious lifeydoodles but they’re statistically insignificant.
Libby the first thing to do is, we abort all the bureaucrats.
Davis is an effing idiot
“it’s gotta be the shoes”
I don’t see how murdering the unborn is a religious issue.
Kind of like when Crowley managed to arrange the M25 around London into a sort of traffic-jammed prayer wheel, grinding out low-grade evil to permeate the countryside for miles around…
These murder mills, being in large urban areas, have permeated the residents in its range with the religious beliefs of the baby-killers like griefyfeets, while it doesn’t tend to get out into “flyover country”.
Like smog.
well excuse me for having an opinion
try explaining yourself better feet. To most of us you aren’t making sense.
If a “Christer” wanted a law making everyone stop and face Nazareth everyday at noon and pray to Jesus, I could see your point but, questioning the morality of abortion is really different.
Belief in the sanctity of life also is involved in laws against suicide.
i’m too hungry to explain over and over
It’s because he says so. That’s why.
He has never made a coherent argument that I can remember. He just asserts.
do not
“people what are unable or unwilling to separate their religious views from their politics. ”
The right to life is in the Declaration of Independence, a political document.
Your position is from the progg cult of death, a religious practice.
Want a redo?
the Declaration of Independence is my favorite declaration ever
What did its author say about that political document? We can look:
Thomas Jefferson to Henry Lee, May 8, 1825 —
*** Dear Sir, […]
That George Mason was the author of the bill of rights, and the constitution founded on it, the evidence of the day established fully in my mind. Of the paper you mention, purporting to be instructions to the Virginia delegation in Congress, I have no recollection. If it were anything more than a project of some private hand, that is to say, had any such instructions been ever given by the convention, they would appear in the journals, which we possess entire. But with respect to our rights, and the acts of the British government contravening those rights, there was but one opinion on this side of the water. All American whigs thought alike on these subjects. When forced, therefore, to resort to arms for redress, an appeal to the tribunal of the world was deemed proper for our justification. This was the object of the Declaration of Independence. Not to find out new principles, or new arguments, never before thought of, not merely to say things which had never been said before; but to place before mankind the common sense of the subject, in terms so plain and firm as to command their assent, and to justify ourselves in the independent stand we are compelled to take. Neither aiming at originality of principle or sentiment, nor yet copied from any particular and previous writing, it was intended to be an expression of the American mind, and to give to that expression the proper tone and spirit called for by the occasion. All its authority rests then on the harmonizing sentiments of the day, whether expressed in conversation, in letters, printed essays, or in the elementary books of public right, as Aristotle, Cicero, Locke, Sidney, &c. The historical documents which you mention as in your possession, ought all to be found, and I am persuaded you will find, to be corroborative of the facts and principles advanced in that Declaration.
Be pleased to accept assurances of my great esteem and respect.
Thomas Jefferson ***
is not
test
the tone and spirit of the declaration are a lot the same as the tone and spirit in which Team R people used to talk about what they called “limited government”
it was a popular principle at one time
“happyfeet says August 6, 2013 at 4:07 pm
well excuse me for having an opinion”
You mean like you excused Akin and retard baby spewing old lifeydoodle Sarah Palin?
no not like that
The newly discovered “right” of a woman to abort her baby, along with the newly discovered “right” for two men to marry each other, are greater matters of faith than the existence of Jesus of Nazareth, born of Joseph and Mary of the house of David in Bethlehem.
These newly discovered “rights” are merely sacraments of the newly strengthened and politicized religious cult of progressivism, formally known through history by diverse names, mostly derived and descended from the serpent (who, as we all know, was cute as a cartoon penguin) that tempted Eve in the garden.
french republican news
SOURCES: NRSC and DSCC Declare Truce on Obamacare Exemption for Staffers
if people want to marry this or abort that it’s none of my business and I’m not going to agitate for a more robust government to interfere with these activities what my fellow citizens have chosen for themselves
that is not a matter of faith in the least
“Team R people used to talk about what they called “limited government” it was a popular principle at one time”
Limited to:
Notice the word “Posterity”? Know what it means?
Someone please haul this out every time feets expresses an opinion on either of these topics in the future. Because I don’t think he actually means “I am not entitled to an opinion”, but rather “I can’t actually defend my position using logic or facts, and too many people are noticing”.
So if someone wants to perform a late term abortion and dismember and flush happyfeet, not my business, and the government shouldn’t bother themselves worrying about it?
It’s what abortion was meant to put a stop to…
posterity are kids what you have and what comprise future generations
aborted kids don’t count as posterity cause they dead
“aborted kids don’t count as posterity cause they dead”
Yeah, ‘cuz the feds were acting beyond their limited government role by worrying about whether Bill and Ted could get married instead of their legitimate limited role of protecting the liberty of our posterity.
You are on the wrong side od governments constitutional role in both instances. But at least your fellow progg friends don’t call you a bitter clinger, so you have that going for you.
“aborted kids don’t count as posterity cause they dead”
sounds like murder no?
happyfeet says August 6, 2013 at 3:12 pm – lifeydoodle is an exceedingly respectful and meticulously precise term for Team Life people what are unable or unwilling to separate their religious views from their politics.
… and then what? Maybe we can separate fidelity from our marriages? Separate integrity from our relationships? Separate industry from our jobs? Since you seem to have a difficult time distinguishing “morality” from “religious views”, maybe we can try the somewhat less loaded term “ethics”.
The reason I oppose abortion isn’t because of a Bible verse, or something someone told me from a pulpit. It is quite simply that human life (and the value thereof) is not determined by the location it may occupy, which is the entire ultimate justification for abortion.
As for your idea of “limited government”, it might ring a bit truer if you weren’t such a big cheerleader for judicial tyranny as long as it advances the cause of an ever descending humanity that gets to rut with no consequence, while our betters take care of us all.
And yeah I know there are nonreligious lifeydoodles but they’re statistically insignificant.
Go talk to Secular Pro-Life about that. I am sure they will give you an earful that is substantially better-written than anything you’ve managed in your life.
On the original topic of the post, there is not enough vomit in my body to express my rage and disgust at this mentality.
You mean like “Thou Shalt Not Murder” and those other religious-y views you hold in such contempt? (And, by extension, should never have been written into law by politicians)
(For the interested parties: Secular Pro-Life. They have very rigorous argumentation and I enjoy reading them.)
i’m not a cheerleader for judicial tyranny DOMA was unconstitutional on the face of it
that’s about the only case like that where I took much of a position
with the pervert Roberts court it’s all whimsical anyway it’s not like there’s any kind of pattern
Judicial tyranny is what the
RobertsKennedy Court did in striking down DOMA -which had more bipartisan support than Obamacare.happyfeet says August 6, 2013 at 6:54 pm
DOMA was unconstitutional on the face of it
Not according to 4 of the 9 philosopher-kings, care to tell us what you know that they don’t?
i know that if you sprinkle hot curry powder on pickles and eat em you are Way Ahead Of The Game
but also I know DOMA was a usurpation of the rights of states to define marriage in accordance with the will of their citizens
this is why we have no more DOMA at all but we still have lots of pickles
but also I know DOMA was a usurpation of the rights of states to define marriage in accordance with the will of their citizens
As opposed to a federal judge vacating a State’s constitutional amendment, which started this mess.
wha??
Mr. mondamy the DOMA case was about the married lesbian what got mugged by the piggy piggy IRS to where she had to pay all her inheritance to our greedy fascist pigthug government
married lesbians must have a certain hi speed lane to the bank ,because that’s where she took my friend who was married to her.He is very sad now and drinks alone alot.
His sighs and groans are audible ,and when he shows up at get togethers or bar-b-ques-people tend to avoid him.
marry a hasty lesbian repent at a bbq with a fifth of jack is what they say, but I thought it was just an aphorism
Since when has feets suddenly been in favor of the State of California defining marriage as one man, one woman? (And the Federal Government, having its own sets of punishments and incentives to offer, can control which groups get which in any fashion that pleases them. Such as tax benefits to those tax payers more likely to produce more taxpayers down the road.)
If the granting of benefits is dependent on a legal status, it is the prerogative of the agency granting those benefits to define that status and determine whether the applicants meet the standards, and they can define it however they wish.
happyfeet says August 6, 2013 at 7:13 pm
wha??
Your selective outrage once again at “usurpation or the rights of states” against evil federal overreach which ends as soon as the federal judge does something you like.
Yes DOMA and the California case were different, but one can’t claim “states rights” in one and ignore the federal overreach in the second.
i just cared about the DOMA case I’m not particularly invested in how the state of california defines marriage – they were destined to vote for gay marriage in the very near term anyways
it’s not a notably socially conservative state
no really
lesbian what got mugged by the piggy piggy IRS
What about siblings? Shouldn’t they be allowed tax advantages, too? Sheesh!
Even if I accept your assertion as having any validity whatsoever, shouldn’t the law as voted be enforced until such time as your flights of fancy actually get onto the taxiway, rather than having some pre-selected (not elected) jackanape in a black robe overturn the whole thing?
siblings can’t get married to each other cause of that would be incense
Besides, I can’t see how DOMA usurped any state’s rights when the plaintiff in that case was suing as an employee of the Federal Government.
“they were destined to vote for gay marriage in the very near term anyways”
What were you going for, best 3 out of 5?
For the gazillionth time like it’ll do any good, States have powers, people as individuals have rights. It doesn’t do to do the work of the opponents for them.
i have no idea what you’re on about Mr. Drumwaster I just think the federal government needs to fuck off
starting….. NOW!
but also I know DOMA was a usurpation of the powers of states to define marriage in accordance with the will of their citizens
i just cared about the DOMA case
Hence the term “selective outrage”. You all about states defining marriage for themselves, until they actually do, and you don’t happen to agree with it.
That means stop pretending to argue from principle, and admit this is all about your feelings , so we can move on.
Why do you think DOMA had anything to do with States’ Rights? Or am I using the wrong verb?
siblingsmen/women can’t get married toeachother men/women cause of that would beincensesodomy.The logic is largely the same in both cases. Same with bestialism.
sodomy fuck yeah
Who needs marriage? ‘feet was arguing tax advantage. Because the 14th amendment or something…
Which is why the Boston Supreme Court was hung to a man after a summary public court martial on the Boston Commons, Abrams tanks surrounding, to keep the homos at bay.
Totally. Except that it doesn’t do that at all.
Ernst Schreiber says August 6, 2013 at 7:41 pm –
Should have said “hanged”, now ‘feet will be on about “hung” men…
The hell you say.
Mr. Pablo the pervert Roberts court agrees with me not you so hah
They hung there after they were hanged, didn’t they? [grin]
(thanks for the correction)
“Totally. Except that it doesn’t do that at all”
Wait, you mean if prop * failed, DOMA would have prevented homos from marrying anyway?
Man, was that ever a waste of time, effort and money…
Blue Moon makes a peabnut bubber ale
And if people want to whack an electric hamster, who are we to stick our noses in it?
prop 8, sorry, itchy shift thumb…
(thanks for the correction)
I have no problem with your usage, but trying to head off another brilliant response like:
sodomy fuck yeah
Do you have a point that doesn’t rest atop your head?
yes my point is you should stop worrying so much about what other people do
They agree with you that gay marriage is the bees knees, not that DOMA burdened the States.
I think. I’m not particularly inclined to go wading through Kennedy’s opinion to find out, though.
just let it go
it’s not worth all the drama
you can bet your ass kenny chesney isn’t sitting around worrying about abortions and gay marriage
Man, was that ever a waste of time, effort and money…
Yes, both for your point, as it eventually turned out…Thanks SCOTUS!
you may be right Mr. Ernst
the Supreme Court tends to just make shit up
You mean the MillerCoors division of the Molson Coors Brewing Company. Those fuckers are hella quaint.
So, the electric hamster whackings are a go!
Blue Moon is autonomous and the same guy is still running things I think what was running them before MC acquired them and plus they’re sponsoring a big craft beer thing in Colorado coming up and plus they make a peabnut bubber ale
As always it’s incredibly enlightening when the yellow peril comments.
happyfeet says August 6, 2013 at 7:49 pm
yes my point is you should stop worrying so much about what other people do
Like voting for Obama, and convincing young mushbrain conservatives to embrace infanticide and hedonism? Check.
Well if we’re going to just let it go and quit worrying about what other people do….
here is an article about Blue Moon
wait my friend M says that Blue moon was created in house at Coors it wasn’t an acquisition
Right, that’s how a plucky little craft brew makes it into every bar, liquor store and grocery in the country, right alongside the Silver Bullets.
o_O
Pluckier than the love child of Charlie Fucking Daniels and Earl Scruggs it is.
when’s the next blue moon?
peabnut bubber ale
Beer for people who don’t actually like the taste of beer? I thought that was what vodka, fruit puree, crushed ice and a little umbrella was for.
I like rum with my fruit puree & crushed ice, thank you very much.
One cup rum, one cup pineapple juice, generous coconut cream, balance of ice cubes into blender
umbrella optional …
you can do a can of pineapple too if you don’t have juice handy it blends right up
umbrella optional …
Won’t you need that for “gettin’ caught in the rain” after having your piña colada?
pikachu what is good meal to have after vacuuming a wyman’s uterus?
you need something healthy but convenient
there’s somewheres where you can get a tasty kale strawberry salad
i think it might could be whole foods
that’s what I would do
you might add some extra fruit if you have some handy and take it into a poppy seed dressing place
song song o the south sweet potato pie and i shut my mouth
poppy seed dressing always makes me think of that singings
When does human life begin, feets?
human life begins when people say hey human life c’mere you cute lil baby wazzle i love you more than beans!
it begins with love you see Mr. W
that’s the secret ingredient
if you don’t have love you’re just going through the motions
faith hope and love
place your bets errybody!
So, let’s assume that someone is loved by nobody. Using your logic, that person is not a person at all, and legal to kill.
And this from the person who claims that the Declaration of Independence is his ” favorite declaration ever.”
it has nothing to do with logic that’s just my feeling about when human life begins
it has nothing to do with logic that’s just my feeling
And there’s the admission I’ve been waiting for.
Now I’m off to listen to Tarkus.
Has the dawn ever seen your eyes?
Have the days made you so unwise?
Realize, you are.
And we know how good law based on feeling is.
Herewith, a key phrase of the Declaration of Independence, rewritten by feets:
“We hold these feelings, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed with certain Rights as long as we feel like it, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
i ‘d put the tarkus in my cloud but I’m not allowed to buy musics this month and what’s a pikachu without fiscal discipline I ask you
come september Mr. Justin Moore’s new set drops I think the first song is ok but maybe a lil overproduced but still that’ll be the next musics i get
Shorter feets: “Squirrel!!!”
“So in our timidity, let each of us make a choice: Whether consciously, to remain a servant of falsehood—of course, it is not out of inclination, but to feed one’s family, that one raises his children in the spirit of lies—or to shrug off the lies and become an honest man worthy of respect both by one’s children and contemporaries.” — Alexander Solzhenitsyn, “Live Not By Lies”
when confronting “carlos danger” always deploy wienerschnitzel. for the dead babies!!
” The fact that the establishment gave the task of defending its positions to the usual political and journalistic hacks was probably a case of Hobson’s choice in an emergency, but it gained it nothing and was just one further error, since those gentle- men’s standards are notorious. As could be expected, they immedi- ately brought into play against the Charter a whole set of slanders, distortions, abuse, half-truths and absolute falsehoods which all represent the dismal range of their capacity. Ispeak from experience as one who has been a favourite target for their sort of behaviour for the past thirty years, and who could well lay claim to the laurels of seniority and worthy service. Though the powers that be may not know it, or rather, would sooner not know it, nay, cannot afford to know it (for where else would they find more obedient, unscrupu- lous and servile creatures), the media are the principal, albeit unintentional, creators and encouragers of opposition, since they are totaJIy suspect and nobody believes them. ”
Havel POTP page 127
squirrels hate me every time i go to pet one they run to the other side of the tree
and they’re not even subtle about it
a pikachu musta bonked a squirrel on the head back in the day is all i can figure
it has nothing to do with logic that’s just my feeling
That is not only your problem, but the problem with most proggies. You use your gonads instead of the brain God gave you to struggle with your amoral feelings/nature.
“a pikachu musta bonked a squirrel on the head”
oh call the animal rights activists in socal asap. you allan danmed abuser of the animals.
tangentally related: this is flat out funny.
Ernst
Mandy has been even more shrill and incoherent than usual … fun to see her mocked so.
Obviously not, because he keeps expressing his opinion. Which, paradoxically, is that he has no business having an opinion.
I wish he’d close the logical loop on this one.
Twitter had a blast! yesterday when @ewerickson tweeted Wendy Davis was “Abortion Barbie”. Trended, that did, for hours.
Prosa pulchra!
Slart, he and logic aren’t exactly on speaking terms. I hear tell that the break-up was not at all amicable.
There was a time when it was understood that everyone is entitled to their own opinion was a gentle rebuke of said opinion.
The “Abortion Barbie” thing is leaving me wondering WTF.
Not funny, to me. YMMV.
earnest. Any time you can poke fun of Amanda is a good time. Who, by the way, has a dildo roughly the size of a Smart Car that has an engine from a CAT D9.
I like Leinenkugals Summer Shandy. Refreshing after doing the lawn.
Abortion Barbie.
I like Leinenkugals Summer Shandy. Refreshing after doing the lawn.
You and me both.
Which reminds me, I need to hit the convenience store before Saturday morning.