Big Brother is watching you, even while on a 100 million dollar vacation that will allow him to have photos of himself taken dominating an elephant.  Which is something several of my graduate school English Professors would have insisted played as a none-too-subtle political statement.  Judicial Watch:

Judicial Watch announced today that it has obtained records from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) revealing that the agency has spent millions of dollars for the warrantless collection and analysis of Americans’ financial transactions. The documents also reveal that CFPB contractors may be required to share the information with “additional government entities.”

Like, say, Organizing for Obama?

The records were obtained pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed on April 24, 2013, following the April 23 Senate Banking Committee testimony of CFPB Director Richard Cordray. The documents uncovered by Judicial Watch include:

• Overlapping contracts with multiple credit reporting agencies and accounting firms to gather, store, and share credit card data as shown in the task list of a contract with Argus Information & Advisory Services LLC worth $2.9 million

• Deloitte Consulting: solicitation issue date 11/30/2011, award effective date 05/29/2012;

• Deloitte Consulting: solicitation issue date 11/30/2011, award effective date 05/29/2012;

• Argus: solicitation issue date 02/14/2012, award effective date 03/15/2012;
• Experian: solicitation issue date 07/03/2012, award effective date 09/24/2012

• An “indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity” contract with Experian worth up to $8,426,650 to track daily consumer habits of select individuals without their awareness or consent

• $4,951,333 for software and instruction paid to Deloitte Consulting LLP

• A provision stipulating that “The contractor recognizes that, in performing this requirement, the Contractor may obtain access to non-public, confidential information, Personally Identifiable Information (PII), or proprietary information.”

• A stipulation that “The Contractor may be required to share credit card data collected from the Banks with additional government entities as directed by the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR).”

The full extent of the CFPB personal financial data collection program is revealed in a document obtained by Judicial Watch entitled “INDEFINITE-DELIVERY INDEFINITE-QUANTITY (IDIQ) STATEMENT OF WORK.”  Issued by CFPB Contracting Officer Xiaoling Ang on July 3, 2012, the IDIQ document’s stated objective: “The CFPB seeks to acquire and maintain a nationally representative panel of credit information on consumers for use in a wide range of policy research projects… The panel shall be a random sample of consumer credit files obtains from a national database of credit files.”

To accomplish this objective, the CFPB describes the scope of the program accordingly:

The panel shall include 5 million consumers, and joint borrowers, co-signers, and authorized users [emphasis added]. The initial panel shall contain 10 years of historical data on a quarterly basis [emphasis added]. The initial sample shall be drawn from current records and historical data appended for that sample as well as additional samples during the intervening years [emphasis added] to make the combines sample representative at each point in time.

[…]

“The Obama administration’s warrantless collection of the private financial information of millions of Americans is mind-blowing.  Is there anything that this administration thinks it can’t do?” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These documents show that the Consumer Financial Protection Board is an out-of-control government agency that threatens the fundamental privacy and financial security of Americans. This is every bit as serious as the controversy over the NSA’s activities.”

Now, were I still a university English teacher, I’d probably point out that a common trope — aside from the malignant narcissism and brazen reliance on an incurious media — in all of these “scandals” is an attempt by an historic President and his cabal of Marxist true believers to exert dominance over individual sovereignty.

— Which I could then, using several prominent theorists and a host of critical lenses, massage into a kind of rape narrative, with Obama, say, having a smoke after having date raped the Statue of Liberty.

But then, that’s the kind of shit that gets you banned from polite intellectual company.  And who among us in the intellectual upper-crust can risk that?

Oh. That’s right.  Me, among others.

Prescience!