14 Replies to “a CITIZEN JOURNALIST continues to look into the Natalee Holloway case and to offer theories on her disappearance that could, perhaps, prove fruitful, were the Aruban government to follow-up on them—and were Greta Van Susteren to take up the mantle and really really dig, 2”

1. len says:

   July 15, 2005 at 4:33 pm

   Yes I have known all long that Rove is respondsible Natalee’s abdunction … think about the timing.

2. Russ from Winterset says:

   July 15, 2005 at 4:43 pm

   The fact that there is no evidence linking Karl Rove to Natalee Holloway, ostriches, or the island of Aruba is proof of how far up the food chain this scandal goes.  You’ve earned your pie today, trooper.

   spamword: “very”….I’m getting VERY annoyed with the constant media coverage of this case.

3. SeanH says:

   July 15, 2005 at 4:51 pm

   Watch out, Jeff!!  This is probably just another diabolical ROVIAN TRAP!!!

4. shank says:

   July 15, 2005 at 4:52 pm

   Just make sure you pin him down real good, because he has this nasty habit of pouting his bottom lip, making puppy-dog eyes and pointing at the media: “They made me do it.”

5. Bucko says:

   July 15, 2005 at 4:54 pm

   Do you really believe that Rove acted alone?  His ability to manipulate lower mammals and animal life (i.e Red state voters) is legendary.  A little mind-control imposed on a randy Ostrich and the next thing you know Natalie-gate. 

   However, it is obvious this is all cover for Bushitler’s impending invasion of oil-rich socialist Venezuela, which is only 17 miles from Aruba.

   No blonds for oil! Karl lied and Natalie died!

6. harrison says:

   July 15, 2005 at 5:17 pm

   You’ve scooped WaPo. They had this story planned for the front page of Sunday’s Style section.
   
   Good job!

7. David C says:

   July 15, 2005 at 6:00 pm

   As they say, “Follow the money!” Ostrich futures… Karl Rove… Halliburton…. Connections?  Can you prove that there aren’t?

8. BLT in CO says:

   July 15, 2005 at 6:24 pm

   Honest laughing out loud (on a conference call no less) over the “No blonds for oil” quote.

   Thanks!

9. TallDave says:

   July 15, 2005 at 6:57 pm

   because of the hypocrisy?

10. MC says:

    July 15, 2005 at 7:01 pm

    If you haven’t been blond, then you’re just chickenblond.

11. David C says:

    July 15, 2005 at 8:18 pm

    “An eye for an eye” leaves the whole world blond!

12. Russ from Winterset says:

    July 16, 2005 at 12:31 am

    Be careful that you don’t get too far out ahead of this story.  After all, we don’t want a whole “the blond leading the blonde” scenario.

13. CraigC says:

    July 16, 2005 at 4:40 am

    What do you get when you turn a blonde upside down?

    A brunette with bad breath.

    Have I told that one here already?

14. Michael says:

    July 16, 2005 at 11:03 pm

    No blonds for oil! Karl lied and Natalie died!

    Actually, about the only industry on Aruba other than tourism is a large Valero Energy oil refinery.  This is scary.  Valero is based in Texas.  And I have personally seen ostriches maintained by ranchers in the Texas Hill Country.  I don’t think I’m going to be able to sleep tonight.

Comments are closed.