Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Colorado Senate meets today to attempt a usurpation of our 2nd Amendment rights

Red State:

The Democrats in Colorado control both chambers of the legislature and the Governor’s office. They assume that this gives them the right to subvert your constitutional rights. They seek to limit your capability to defend yourself by banning concealed carry on campuses and limiting the capacity of magazines. They intend to make it more difficult to procure a firearm through an expansion of background checks and increased fees, read taxes, on the same.

Senate President John Morse has gone so far as to introduce legislation which blatantly contradicts federal law. Morse, with no regard for the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, intends to make gun owners, sellers, and manufacturers liable for any damages that occur from the discharge of a weapon they owned, sold, or produced.

[…]

The Colorado Legislature has brought in Mark Kelly to testify on restrictions to magazine capacity. As one person in Colorado told me, the legislature is bringing in people from out of state while ignoring people in state.

[my emphases]

If these measures pass — the House bills that have already passed and now additional unconstitutional measures being promoted by the Senate — I expect that many of the outlying counties will simply determine to ignore them.

The problem is, State law enforcement can still claim jurisdiction — and so what we’ll see, potentially, is a tension between the state policing agencies and local law enforcement, all brought about because the Democrats found an opportunity to exploit that they think “justifies” what they’ve long determined to do:  undermine the 2nd Amendment in every way possible, causing it to die without their ever having to attempt to rid themselves of it through a Constitutional amendment.

I just hope some legislator has the balls to stand up and tell Mark Kelly that had the shooter in Arizona been limited to a 15, a 10, or even a 7-round mag — I often carry 15 + 1 in my FNP 45 — he may have chosen more powerful ammunition, and Gabby Gifford’s head could have conceivably been turned to mist.  This is an unpleasant truth — but it’s one that needs to be uttered to counter the emotional blackmail that Kelly drags along with him.

You can watch the live stream here.

update:

The Senate just voted to adjourn until tomorrow.  Not being an expert on parliamentary procedure (and having missed some of the earlier conversation), I’m not sure how or why this is.  I do know that gun rights groups had been urging pro-2nd Amendment citizens to flood the Capitol; so perhaps this has something to do with that?

15 Replies to “Colorado Senate meets today to attempt a usurpation of our 2nd Amendment rights”

  1. JD says:

    They are not trying to ban guys. No way. No how. Just some guns. And some shotguns. Most guns. And standard capacity magazines. And ammunition required by law.

    But the support the 2nd Amendment. These are just common sense protections.

  2. JD says:

    They are cowards.

  3. angstlee says:

    If indeed they adjourned this until tomorrow in order to avoid the anticipated large crowds of protestors, what a worthless bunch of cowards.

  4. dicentra says:

    Don’t the County Sheriffs have the ability to tell evabody else to step off?

  5. ironpacker says:

    “what a worthless bunch of cowards.”

    It’s who they are, it’s what they do.

  6. happyfeet says:

    well whatever they pass I’m sure Boehner will be happy to take it up in the House

    speaking of boehnerfag antics the squester’s not 2 days old and already Team Fiscal Responsibility is whining about how we need to spend spend spend more more more

    Wonkbook’s Number of the Day: $7 billion. That’s the amount Republicans want to restore in defense spending from the sequester’s cuts.

    gotta slop the pentagon piggies

    jesus

    Team R is just fascism’s dorky junior partner anymore

  7. mojo says:

    “Filthy peasants!”

  8. dicentra says:

    “Filthy peasants!”

    Pretty sure it’s “The peasants are revolting.”

  9. geoffb says:

    Stand Your Ground Reform Introduced in Florida:

    Currently, the law allows for people who face an aggressor to be prosecuted if they display their weapon or fire a warning shot without hitting anyone.

    Aggressors whose actions were stopped, could call the police and claim they were assaulted.

    From victim surveys it is clear that the most common defensive use of a firearm is to display it to show an aggressor that the potential victim is armed, which in most cases defuses the situation. The reform proposed follows the Arizona defensive display law passed in 2009, which allows people to show aggressors that they are armed, without legal peril. The proposed Florida law goes one step further and allows warning shots to be fired.

  10. JD says:

    Aggressors whose actions were stopped, could call the police and claim they were assaulted.

    Our country is so fucked.

  11. geoffb says:

    Oregon, Eugene, Oregon no less.

    A rally supporting a ban on “assault weapons” in Eugene, Ore., failed to draw the attention of the community Saturday afternoon, with only about 20 people in attendance, including the media.
    […]
    The Examiner reports that there was very little enthusiasm in the crowd, which was “bordering on complacency.” It notes that the poor turnout “mirrors the sentiment of the majority as to pending heightened state and federal gun control.”

    My bolding.

  12. leigh says:

    The proposed Florida law goes one step further and allows warning shots to be fired.

    To the melon or the torso?

  13. Hmm…, what are they flooding the Capitol with?

  14. Patrick Chester says:

    dicentra says March 4, 2013 at 11:04 am

    “Filthy peasants!”

    Pretty sure it’s “The peasants are revolting.”

    “You said it, they stink on ice!”

    :-/

Comments are closed.