Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

“Mexico To Ask U.S. Senate To Create Registry Of Gun Owners In Border States…”

Sovereignty to die a death of a thousand cuts.  From the Blaze:

Mexican lawmakers will ask the U.S. Senate to create a registry of all commercialized firearms in border states, which includes California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas. Mexico says it will make it easier to trace guns used in violent attacks.

The measure was reportedly approved on January 9 by Mexico’s Permanent Commission, a government entity that meets when Mexico’s Senate and the Chamber of Deputies is in recess. Gun owners in Arizona are calling the proposal “foolish” and an “invasion of privacy.”

This is, of course, preparatory for the much broader UN small arms treaty dictates — itself a move to weaken state sovereignty while keeping it putatively in place.  Not to mention a move toward a national gun registry, which is the only viable enforcement mechanism for “universal background checks” that are now being pushed by a “bi-partisan” Senate group led by Chuck Schumer and John McCain, two names that immediately spring to mind when on thinks of “those most likely to protect or individual liberties.”

If we were living i in any other time in US history, the answer to such an ludicrous and presumptuous request would be to direct Mexican lawmakers to act like a deluxe beef and bean burrito and get stuffed. Then smother themselves in tasty guacamole.

Today, though, we’ll hear about partnerships and “common sense” solutions, which evidently include straw purchases orchestrated by our own governmental agencies that send “assault-style” weapons to Mexican drug cartels.

This is a country that knows collapse is coming, and its ruling elite is doing anything it can to insulate itself against the widespread pain, revolt, and desperation that is somewhere over the Utopian rainbow.

And it’s forging alliances with other corrupt totalitarian states.

Maybe this is the reason the Muslim Brotherhood has become so popular with our ruling class. They’re taking notes on propaganda and oppression from those who’ve been so successful at it in the past.

After all, you don’t create a pure paradise without tramping the bad apples into mash. Just ask Bill Ayers.

(h/t geoff B and Weasel Zippers)

17 Replies to ““Mexico To Ask U.S. Senate To Create Registry Of Gun Owners In Border States…””

  1. happyfeet says:

    the difference in thinkings between these goof-ass mexicans and meghan’s coward daddy is not a particularly vast gulf really

  2. JohnInFirestone says:

    So, the US government illegally allows weapons to flow over the border into cartel hands which are used in the murder of hundreds of Mexican citizens and that’s not a big deal.

    But, American citizens with legally owned firearms is a concern?

  3. Squid says:

    After all, you don’t create a pure paradise without tramping the bad apples into mash. Just ask Bill Ayers.

    Bill Ayers is a fucking coward, who abuses the protections of the civilization he’s trying to destroy. He’s a pampered ass who’s perfectly happy to let his “friends” get killed building and planting his bombs, but would crap his pants if he were ever confronted by an armed and determined adversary.

    What he and his cowardly buddies desire — no, require — is an unarmed, cowed populace who will buckle under to their whims without a fight. I’m actually happy that they’re finally making their move on our firearms, since it’s serving as a clarifying event for those who would ignore or deny the Left’s power grab. A power grab blatant to anyone paying attention, which makes it heartening that more and more are finally paying attention.

    Best of luck to Billy and Barry and all their little fascist friends as they work to disarm us. Protip: we will not be disarmed by any means short of open warfare by the State against its people, and any such war is one the State will surely lose. So keep it coming, you glorious revolutionary socialist bastards! That eschaton ain’t gonna imminentize itself!

  4. Slartibartfast says:

    these goof-ass mexicans

    y u hate peeple what makes ur burritos n chimchangas?

  5. happyfeet says:

    i just meant the lawmakers who are fascists like our ones Mr. Slart

  6. jcw46 says:

    John McCain no longer qualifies for the sobriquet of “War Hero”.

    He qualifies for another one shared with his equals; Benedict Arnold, Tokyo Rose, Quisling et al.

  7. Slartibartfast says:

    I wonder which ones are cowards like Meghan’s coward daddy?

  8. Slartibartfast says:

    jcw46, history is full of people who have comported themselves honorably in battle and otherwise in politics.

    I tend to honor McCain for the former and dishonor him for the latter, rather than do a kind of blanket invalidation of his entire life.

  9. mojo says:

    Try this phrase, not in the standard handbook:

    “Besa me culo, pendejo.”

  10. geoffb says:

    Maybe this is the reason the Muslim Brotherhood has become so popular with our ruling class. They’re taking notes on propaganda and oppression from those who’ve been so successful at it in the past.

    Success!

  11. Scott Hinckley says:

    What is a “commercialized” firearm? Is that one with an ad on the stock? :-)

    Seriously through, what do they mean by a commercialized firearm?

  12. geoffb says:

    What is a “commercialized” firearm?

    One which is sold to private individuals not government is my reading of it.

  13. […] “Mexico To Ask U.S. Senate To Create Registry Of Gun Owners In Border States…” | … […]

  14. Scott Hinckley says:

    I understand what you are saying, geoffb, but on what grounds are they making this distinction? If I manufacture two ladders (for example), and sell one to a home owner and one to a park ranger, why is one commercialized and the other is not?

    I know, I know – I’m preaching to the choir here. We really do have to figure out how to make Liberals’ stupidity actually hurt when they display it, not when it impacts us.

  15. sdferr says:

    on what grounds

    Looks like the simple *one is good* (govrmnt), *the other is not good* (private).

Comments are closed.