Jawa Report has posted the first part of his 4 part interview with the family of Roy Hallums, a civilian contractor held hostage in Iraq since November.
As Rusty notes in his email, “the Hallums family has asked that we not forget the plight of Roy and other civilian hostages in Iraq.” So if you can tear yourself away from the week-long televised excitement of Pope-a-palooza—or the blogging spectacle of Time’s VICIOUS affront to Ann Coulter’s dignity (WOULD THEY HAVE ELONGATED HITLER‘S LEGS?—OR PLACED HILLARY IN A POTENTIALLY UNFLATTERING SEMIOTIC POSITION? HELL NO! THIS IS THE PARTISAN COVER ART OF THE BEAST!)—take a few moments to check it out.
****
update: I MEAN, WHY NOT JUST SHORTEN HER LEGS? WHAT IS IT THEY’RE AFTER?—SOME SORT OF CRYPTIC STATEMENT ON BUSHCO’S HUGE DEFICIT?
IT’S ALL SO ENIGMATIC—YET AT THE SAME TIME, SO PERFECTLY OBVIOUS!
LIKE LUCIFER. WHO LIES, BUT WHO MIXES LIES WITH THE TRUTH TO CONFUSE US!
****
update 2: THE VILE COVER ART OF THE DARK ONE, IS WHAT THIS IS!
Unflattering? The elongated leg thing just highlighted her long thin frame.. It was pretty cool looking I thought… You wanna see unflattering, check out the cover of The National Enquirer next time your at the supermarket.. They know ‘unflattering’.. Christ, Ann got a freakin’ cover of Time Magazine.. Methinks she prosteth too much.
If they shortened her legs, she’d look just like Wee Man on Jack Ass.. you know..except that she’s skinny and a girl and stuff..
well, Lucifer works for Time magazine, so it makes sense.
I won’t tear myself away from the Pope-a-palooza cuz it’s kinda important to…ya know….us Catholics. But I will pray for the family of the hostages.
It’s no big deal, but it’s a terrible picture of Ann. She hates it, but what was she thinking with those witch shoes ANYWAY?
Well, you could tear yourself away for maybe a few minutes, right? I mean, even FOXNews cuts to a story about Michael Jackson every once in a while.
I think I must be the only person on this planet who thought it was a pretty cool picture.
But then, I’m a legs man, so maybe I’m prejudiced in that regard.
Don’t blame me, pal.
Spambuster: church
Would I lie?
I thought it was a really cool pic. I can see Coulter complaining—it furthers her schtick (of which I’m a fan, incidentally); but honestly, it seems quite a, er, stretch, to turn this into some sort of obvious and intentional attack.
Personally, I think she looks good. Which means that Satan was a bit off his game, at least in my regard.
This coming from the guy with a crush on Elastigirl. Shocking.
Elastigirl?
I think it’s a great pic, and I dare say that’s really exactly the look she was hoping for. Her complaint is just part of the “evil MSM is out to bash conservatives” game.
Not that the MSM isn’t out to bash conservatives, but I think she’s playing it up.
From the Incredibles, RWS. She’s stretchy.
But then, I’m a legs man, so maybe I’m prejudiced in that regard.
Yeah, but legs that make her look like she should a member of the Timbertoes Family??
And sometimes Lucifer, bartender at Chez Hell bar and dancehall, mixes Gin and Vermouth to confuse us. Works just as well as the whole lies and truth thing.
I thought the pic made her kinda look like “Edith Anne” , , , And that’s the truth- PTHhhbb
Gail, it is just so sad that I didn’t know that.
That photographer (whose name escapes me) is known for employing the fisheye lens….RWS, I have to agree with you about the Witchypoo shoes. Urg.
Glad to hear I’m not the only one with a crush on Elastigirl.