8 Replies to “UH OH: FAKE INDIAN’S FAKE LAW PRACTICING NOT A FAKE PROBLEM AFTERALL!”

1. DarthLevin says:

   September 28, 2012 at 2:48 pm

   Who needs a spot to open up? Fauxcahontas will be the tenth justice, declares His Pharaohnic Majesty, King Barack I. So let it be written, so let it be done.

2. B Moe says:

   September 28, 2012 at 2:53 pm

   Do we have a Czar of Casino Gambling?

3. mojo says:

   September 28, 2012 at 3:16 pm

   Ugh.

4. Darleen says:

   September 28, 2012 at 4:10 pm

   mojo.wins.thread.

5. Sears Poncho says:

   September 28, 2012 at 7:55 pm

   From the link:
   Prof Jacobson, on his blog Legal Insurrection, is in line for an Ethics Hero award with his tenacity regarding Elizabeth Warren’s dubious qualifications to engage in the practice of law in Massachusetts. The overwhelming reaction by his colleagues in legal academia, and mine in the legal ethics community, has been to airily dismiss his arguments as trivial, far-fetched and thinly disguised political warfare, since Jacobson is an unapologetic conservative blogger (and a distinguished one.) Meanwhile, the mainstream media has, I think it is fair to say, completely ignored the story….

   The rude brush off Prof. Jacobson is getting in this wagon-circling exercise is wrong in every way, and does injustice to every person and institution involved, including the Massachusetts legal establishment, the legal profession, ethical lawyers (which, believe it or not, the vast majority of them are), Senator Brown, the U.S. Senate, Massachusetts voters, and the American public….

   So, we have a bunch of ethical lawyers who are nevertheless looking the other way when it comes to Elizabeth Warren. Got it. Is this a case of the old joke about 90% of the profession giving the 10% a bad name?

6. BigBangHunter says:

   September 28, 2012 at 8:29 pm

   Lizzy Warden took an axe
   gave her campaign forty whacks
   When she saw what she had done
   gave her party forty one

   “….Which asks the question…If she ends up on the high court would they have to make her chief justice?”

7. LBascom says:

   September 28, 2012 at 10:01 pm

   Don’t worry about a Justice Warren. I’m pretty sure Eric Holder is next up.

8. serr8d says:

   September 29, 2012 at 8:07 am

   Commenter Leerayno (sp?) wins that LI thread…

   “Of course Warren hopes that her prestige will shield her from all.”

   Prestige?

   She’s a 3rd rate Marxist law professor who sincerely believes that the purpose of government is the enslavement of productive individuals for the benefit and enablement of the unproductive.

   She got hired at Harvard because she’s a she instead of a he, and because she was willing to fraudulently claim genetic descent from a group of people the left likes to pretend are inferior and therefore cannot compete on equal footing with everyone else.

   With prestige like that, who needs infamy.

   Elizabeth, dearest, you should forthwith disperse yourself to the four directions. Shameful hussy.

Comments are closed.