Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

The White House knew Benghazi was a terrorist attack within 24 hours of 9/11 … [Darleen Click]

Why did it take a until last week before anyone in the White House would admit it and toady Robert Gibbs started making excuses?

Within 24 hours of the 9-11 anniversary attack on the United States consulate in Benghazi, U.S. intelligence agencies had strong indications al Qaeda–affiliated operatives were behind the attack, and had even pinpointed the location of one of those attackers. Three separate U.S. intelligence officials who spoke to The Daily Beast said the early information was enough to show that the attack was planned and the work of al Qaeda affiliates operating in Eastern Libya.

Nonetheless, it took until late last week for the White House and the administration to formally acknowledge that the Benghazi assault was a terrorist attack. On Sunday, Obama adviser Robert Gibbs explained the evolving narrative as a function of new information coming in quickly on the attacks. “We learned more information every single day about what happened,” Gibbs said on Fox News. “Nobody wants to get to the bottom of this faster than we do.”

Susan Rice was out on the Sunday shows doing her snarling best to Blame the film-maker.

Yesterday, at the U.N. Obama came up with the jaw-dropping statement, among a lot of other disturbing statements,

The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.

… and also continued to refuse to call Benghazi a terrorist attack.

Whether deliberate cover-up or blatant incompetency, the Media would never have let President Bush get the pass the Obama-leg-humpers are doing today.

18 Replies to “The White House knew Benghazi was a terrorist attack within 24 hours of 9/11 … [Darleen Click]”

  1. Libby says:

    If they knew 24hrs after it happened then they were just 23hrs 59min 59 seconds later that the rest of us.
    They attacked our embassies on freaking 9/11.

  2. sdferr says:

    With cell phone communications, why not assume the CIA or State Dept. and by proxy, the White House, knew what the people in the Consulate were telling them was going on as the attack was underway, i.e., immediately. It could even be jihadis were hollering in Arabic — as we have seen they have occasion to do when they murder in the name of their god — such stuff as Allahu akbar?

  3. Danger says:

    “Why did it take a until last week…”

    Darleen

    This is a case where the question is the answer. The film was a convenient distraction deployed to prevent answering the real question, namely: Why weren’t our embassys and consulates better protected on the anniversary of 911?

    The administration is betting the media will tire of the story and/or other events will overtake it before they are forced to admit their neglegence.

  4. Neo says:

    They know that Romney made a big deal out of the Cairo embassy messages about the pathetic YouTube video, so they don’t want to separate the Cairo screwup from the Benghazi screwup by saying that it has no connection to that protest that the media told us “Romney was dead wrong about,” even though he wasn’t.

  5. Libby says:

    The rioters in many locations hoisted the AQ flag, burned pictures of Obama, and chanted, “Obama, Obama, we are all Osama!” Obama didn’t want to admit that they were protesting him and his approval of killing Osama bin Laden as well as the drone assassinations of various other AQ operatives (and bystanders).
    Apparently in years past embassies beefed up security around the 9/11 anniversary.

  6. geoffb says:

    The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.

    Many times people of the left when they get worked up in front of an adoring audience let loose what they believe in their heart before their head can step in and censor it. They will often try later to explain it as some form of a joke though those in the audience never took it as such at the time.

  7. EBL says:

    We now know absolutely the Obama Administration lied. But the question the press is not asking is why did the Obama Administration lie about the Benghazi attack?

  8. Danger says:

    “Obama didn’t want to admit that they were protesting him”

    Ya know what else Obama doesn’t want?

    An unfavorable Bush comparison.

    I’m sure that I’m not the only one that this wouldn’t have occurred on op GW’s watch!

    What? The Sudan is denying our Marine security force; I’m sorry that wasn’t a request

  9. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Because if it was a terrorist attack they would be obligated to do something about it. Also they would be obligated to understand how it came to happen.

    Obama doesn’t like to act. And he sure as hell doesn’t want anyone asking “who lost Egypt?”.

  10. Danger says:

    (cont)

    They’re coming and they’ll be armed for bear so open the door or have it blown off; your choice.

  11. @PurpAv says:

    …the Media would never have let Bill Clinton get the pass the Obama-leg-humpers are doing today.

  12. Neo says:

    What I really loved about this episode was that they opened a FBI criminal investigation in an attempt to cutoff all new information about the attack.

  13. OCBill says:

    Obama can’t admit it was Al Qaeda. He killed Osama, and Osama = Al Qaeda. Therefore, once Obama killed Osama, Al Qaeda ceased to be a threat. Ispo Facto.

    Any admission that Al Qaeda can still pose any kind of threat would completely undermine Obama’s narrative that by his single-handed vanquishing of Bin Laden, he has in fact rid the world of Islamic terrorism. All that remains are random, justifiably angry crowds that occasionally get a lit out of hand. There is no more terrorism, and there are no more terrorists. THE END.

  14. BigBangHunter says:

    – Well, except for one tiny inconvieniant truthiness. The pres of Libya says he’s full of shit.

    – So who you going to believe, the half white maniac leader of the Unicorn Empire or your lying eyes and ears?

    – If I were the families of those 4 murdered Americans, I’d be in every court I could find, and on the top of the list would be Obama, Hillery, That Islamic bitch that works for her, Carney, Rice, Gibbs, Axelrod, and anyone else that had anything to do with this criminal offense, in particular for contributory negligence, accessory to murder, and the ongoing coverup.

    – And I wouldn’t wait until after the elections, I’d be in court Monday. Even Obama can’t hide behind the office if murder is involved. And if they tried to buy me off I’d add that to the list, with fukk survalence and video taping of any and all negotiations with witnesses. I’d tied these bastards up until even their own relatives wouldn’t recognize them.

    – Reelection would be the least of Bummblefucks problems.

  15. guinspen says:

    What is, “Because among his national secutity advisors are substitute NFL referees?”

    I’ll continue with Cheap Shots for $300, Art.

  16. guinspen says:

    *bzzzzzzz*

    “secutity”

    Judges?

  17. BigBangHunter says:

    If you’ll be my bodyguard, I can be your long lost pal……
    I can call you Betty, And Betty when you call me,
    call-l-l me-e-e-e Al, call me AlQaeda

    Nah-naa-naa-nah-nah
    Nah-naa-naa-nah-nah
    Nah-naa-naa-nah-nah
    Nah-naa-naa-nah-nah

    ……call-l-l me-e-e-e Al, call me AlQaeda

  18. geoffb says:

    What is, “Because among his national secutity advisors are substitute NFL referees?”

Comments are closed.