Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

The righteous words you’ll never hear from the Obama admin nor any modern Democrat [Darleen Click]

h/t Smitty

Meanwhile, Egyptian Islamist leader Morsi makes his demands of American behavior known.

On the eve of his first trip to the United States as Egypt’s new Islamist president, Mohamed Morsi said the United States needed to fundamentally change its approach to the Arab world, showing greater respect for its values and helping build a Palestinian state, if it hoped to overcome decades of pent-up anger. […]

“Successive American administrations essentially purchased with American taxpayer money the dislike, if not the hatred, of the peoples of the region,” he said, by backing dictatorial governments over popular opposition and supporting Israel over the Palestinians.

Well, Obama’s Cairo speech during his apology tour certainly went over well, doncha know?

Forward!

41 Replies to “The righteous words you’ll never hear from the Obama admin nor any modern Democrat [Darleen Click]”

  1. Silver Whistle says:

    [..]Mohamed Morsi said the United States needed to fundamentally change its approach to the Arab world, showing greater respect for its values[..]

    It’s not going to be easy getting rioting, arson, sodomy and murder legalised, but you have to admire his optimism.

  2. serr8d says:

    ” The righteous words you’ll never hear from the Obama admin”

    “Keep you own money. You’ve earned it!”

  3. geoffb says:

    Mr. Morsi, 61, whose office was still adorned with nautical paintings that Mr. Mubarak left behind, said the United States should not expect Egypt to live by its rules.

    “If you want to judge the performance of the Egyptian people by the standards of German or Chinese or American culture, then there is no room for judgment,” he said. “When the Egyptians decide something, probably it is not appropriate for the U.S. When the Americans decide something, this, of course, is not appropriate for Egypt.”

    Nice use of “probably” and “of course”.

    Of course there are others there who state things plainer.

    Egypt’s president and other Muslim leaders should demand the U.N. criminalize contempt of religion after the release of an anti-Islamic film and cartoons which demonstrate growing racism, said the leader of the biggest ultra-orthodox Islamist party.

    Despite doctrinal and political differences with President Mohamed Mursi’s Muslim Brotherhood, the Salafist Nour Party played a key role in supporting it during presidential elections in June.

    Led by Emad Abdel Ghaffour, it now ranks as the second-largest party in parliament and plays a formidable force in Egypt’s new politics.

    “We call for legislation or a resolution to criminalize contempt of Islam as a religion and its Prophet,” said Ghaffour, one of four permanent assistants to the president, on Saturday.

    “The voice of reason in the West will prevail if there is mutual respect, dialogue and efficient lobbying for this critical resolution,” he told Reuters in an interview.

  4. Silver Whistle says:

    Tony Badran gives some background:

    The Salafists, therefore, have systematically sought to paint Morsi as the reincarnation of Mubarak. Their move was calculated to show him as someone lacking Islamic credentials, an American lackey, and an upholder of the previous regime’s relationship with Israel. What’s more, it followed a well-established tradition in Arab politics. Throughout the twentieth century, Arab states and political actors have framed their various civil wars and struggles for power as a fight against external enemies, be they Britain, Israel or the US.

    Attacking the US Embassy was a perfect way to embroil Morsi—the equivalent of a bank shot in a game of pool. The anti-Islam video was just an instrument that served these local dynamics. The new Egyptian political class was simply conducting politics as usual. If the US is going to navigate the terrain of post-Arab Spring politics, it needs to recognize these dynamics of inter-Islamist and inter-Arab competition for power and prestige.

  5. Emmett Crunk says:

    Really, I gotta say, if the Egyptians want to run their place like a 12th Century craphole, I’m starting to think we should let ’em, but on our way out, we have to remind them – and the rest of the world – that actions have consequences. Start with seeding the then-abandoned embassy grounds with landmines, and wing it from there.

    I can’t think of a better model than General Sir Charles James Napier, when receiving complaints from hindu priests, concerning suttee, responded:

    “Be it so. This burning of widows is your custom; prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also a custom. When men burn women alive we hang them, and confiscate all their property. My carpenters shall therefore erect gibbets on which to hang all concerned when the widow is consumed. Let us all act according to national customs.

    And be it so. Let these ‘sovereign nations’ act in whatever way they wish, along with accepting the consequences. It’ll be rough for a while on foreign travellers until a significant portion of Americans stop worshipping dickless, feculant bastards (of whatever party). We could achieve a lot more with a lot less politicians, period, because I’d rather eat a smaller shit sandwich than a Shit Royale with a large vanilla milkshake, really.

    Napier’s quote above is quite well known, but one of his others should be remembered too:

    “… the human mind is never better disposed to gratitude and attachment than when softened by fear.”

    Let’s start out sowing a little fear. If we feel like it, we’ll go back later and get some gratitude and attachment.

  6. geoffb says:

    These groups saw an opening to embarrass the Egyptian president by outbidding him on Muslim causes, thereby presenting him with a choice of either standing up for the prophet of Islam, or for his relations with the US, and thus appear as another American quisling like Mubarak.
    […]
    Stated differently, Saber was contending that the Brotherhood was prioritizing politics—i.e., diplomatic ties with the US—over the honor of the prophet.

    In contrast to what Saber described as Morsi’s accommodation, Mamdouh Ismail, vice president of the Salafist al-Asala party, claimed that “the Salafist call was the strongest Islamic entity defending the prophet.”

    This kind of game has been played by the left too and always ends with the “moderate” caving to the radicals. In Islam this has been playing out for over 1000 years and the ones most rabidly defending the honor of the prophet most always win.

  7. Silver Whistle says:

    I tend to agree with you, geoff. At first I just assumed that the MB was colluding with the rioters, but having read Badran’s piece, I think it is more than it first appeared. The MB response could be to try to outflank the Salafists on outrage, but of course it depends on how much they and Morsi value whatever it is they get out of the relationship with the US.

  8. Libby says:

    I’m with Mr. Condell: Their rage does not impress me. I don’t care.
    Regarding Egypt, it’s interesting that Morsi is demanding we change our approach. I’m with Rand Paul’s approach: no more funding. Oh, and good luck without the revenue from tourism now that you’ve scared everyone away.

  9. @PurpAv says:

    Morsi seems to think he’s ENTITLED to our money. I’m hoping President Romney will disabuse him of this notion.

  10. StrangernFiction says:

    And both parties want to keep on funding these allah pukes. National suicide.

  11. geoffb says:

    From the Feb 9th 2011 statement by the Muslim Brotherhood about the “Arab Spring”.

    In the wake of the people’s revolt, we have accepted invitations to participate in talks on a peaceful transition. Along with other representatives of the opposition, we recently took part in exploratory meetings with Vice President Omar Suleiman. In these talks, we made clear that we will not compromise or co-opt the public’s agenda. We come with no special agenda of our own — our agenda is that of the Egyptian people, which has been asserted since the beginning of this uprising.

    We aim to achieve reform and rights for all: not just for the Muslim Brotherhood, not just for Muslims, but for all Egyptians. We do not intend to take a dominant role in the forthcoming political transition. We are not putting forward a candidate for the presidential elections scheduled for September.

  12. May I suggest our first fundamental change be the immediate cessation of all further aid?

  13. TmjUtah says:

    Silver linings thinking, probably…

    If the UN general assembly did pass such a motion by simple majority, might it be the straw that finally causes our cowardly political class to finally step up and seek a League of Democracies…?

    I know it will not happen but wishes don’t cost nothing. Unless you are a statist sitting in the oval office, of course.

  14. newrouter says:

    seek a League of Democracies…?

    oh good egypt can join

  15. cranky-d says:

    U.S. out of U.N.

    U.N. out of U.S.

    Let the barbarians pass resolutions about each other all they want to, after which they can kill each other to their heart’s content.

    The U.N. only exists to control the behavior of the U.S. Eff that.

  16. serr8d says:

    Pat Condell is sort of a dick, towards anyone with any religious beliefs whatsoever. Think a more nuanced happyfeet.

    That said, he does nail the Islamacysts. For whatever good that does anyone, because even when they are nailed, they don’t learn from it.

  17. @PurpAv says:

    The US has sent the palis billions in aid over the years hoping they’d come to their senses. They trash everything they touch. At this points, its obvious sending any more is just throwing good money after bad.

    We have to accept that the smart one got the hell out years ago, and its only the defectives and malcontents that are left.

  18. newrouter says:

    because even when they are nailed, they don’t learn from it.

    proggtards too

  19. Ernst Schreiber says:

    U.S. out of U.N.

    U.N. out of U.S.

    Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

  20. Ernst Schreiber says:

    Maybe they should put some of that decades old pent-up anger to good use and build the Palestinians a state themselves instead of waiting for us to do it for them.

  21. cranky-d says:

    They don’t want a Palestinian state. They want the Jews to leave or die. After that, no one will care about the “Palestinians.”

  22. happyfeet says:

    I has numerous nuances plus also various inflections I’m practically kaleidoscopic sometimes!

  23. happyfeet says:

    Today I woke up in Roswell, which is in New Mexico. There’s an iron cross there what some German pows made in some work they did as part of a flood control project. It was covered up by concrete almost immediately after. It was hidden for many moons but you can see it now.. Kinda spooky.

    Also today I saw a muntjac.

  24. serr8d says:

    Heh. Cheers, ‘feets! Been watching the Emmys?

    Oh, and this.

  25. serr8d says:

    Hopefully you sported a camera, took a picture of it and can link, so’s I can judge the quality of teh spookiness?

  26. newrouter says:

    what’s the eats in roswell ‘feets?

  27. happyfeet says:

    Here is a link

    http://m.flickr.com/#/photos/87554623@N05/8018308798/

    Didn’t really eat in Roswell… I ate in Hatch… In New Mexico they do this thing where you can order enchiladas with a fried egg on top! So clever and so so tasty.

    They had a chinese/mexican place in Roswell (may have been called margarita’s) … I was intrigued but didn’t stop. Roswell is kind of a sad place. Bikers and alien kitsch and old people.

  28. newrouter says:

    what no prussian food?

  29. serr8d says:

    I’m not sold that it’s at all spooky, ‘feets. As an artifact that’s miles from home, lost in space and time, sure, but spooky needs another element besides bright sunlight.

    Perhaps if you go back, at sunset or sunrise, and get some nice shadows or gloom?

    Here. This is spooky.

  30. Yackums says:

    OT –

    Today, the SCOTUS is saying whether they’re going to hear this case.

    A prediction:

    They refuse, and Obama pardons the guy two days before the election in a brazen attempt to win Florida.

    (Watch the video, but watch out for the execrable DWS at 7:46, doing the right thing for a change).

  31. happyfeet says:

    the woods are lovely dark and deep and also spooky

  32. Dale Price says:

    “The new Egyptian political class was simply conducting politics as usual. If the US is going to navigate the terrain of post-Arab Spring politics, it needs to recognize these dynamics of inter-Islamist and inter-Arab competition for power and prestige.”

    I get what he’s saying, but pressure on the MB from the Salafis has a distinct “please don’t throw me in the briar patch” odor, at least as far as Morsi is concerned.

    I don’t think their goals are all that different. What differs is which personnel have their hands on the tiller.

  33. mojo says:

    Did Morsi just say that we should stop paying those barbaric fucks?

    I’m in full agreement.

  34. geoffb says:

    I agree Dale.

    It is more like, to me, where the EPA grants money to an outfit like NRDC which they then use to sue the EPA in court, where the EPA puts up at most a token defense, “forcing” them to implement new regulations which they can say “We didn’t want to do this but we have to.”

    NRDC gives EPA cover to do what they really want but have to hide their intent from the public. Salafi’s give the MB cover to do what they really want but have to hide their intent in order to continue to get aid.

    They could also be seen as playing “good cop” [MB], “bad cop” [Salafi] against the West.

  35. Matt says:

    I saw that late last week, Rand Paul got the Senate to vote on his bill cutting off Egypt, Libya and a couple of other Middle Eastern countries- the bill was defeated by something like 80-20. I’d love to know the rationale behind the Republicans who voted against the bill. If i was Romney, one of my primary foreign policy initiatives, in light of the past two weeks, would be to cut off any payments to the vast majority of Middle Eastern countries. Is Barack Hussein Obama really going to hang his campaign on our broke country sending billions to crazies to hate us?

    This “foreign aid” BS and the failure to address it in post 9-11 times, is mind boggling to me. Anyone know why no prominent politician besides Paul seems to want to address it ? What do we get out of paying the Muslim Brotherhood?

  36. Dale Price says:

    If you think foreign aid is of any value, then I could see a reasonable argument to vote “no” with respect to Libya. The Libyans per se (as opposed to the Al Qaeda presence) really aren’t the problem, and conflating them with the problems of Pakistan and Egypt is counterproductive.

  37. Slartibartfast says:

    Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

    I tend to think of it as more like: To jaw- jaw is always better than to war-war. But mileage varies on this. What used to be accomplished through one-on-one jaw-jawing is now many on many.

    But the presumption of the UN as an efficient accomplisher of anything at all is silly and unfounded. It’s a pipe organ, driven by warm air.

  38. guinspen says:

    nn + vi = bs

  39. Roswell, New Mexico says:

    If only you’d phoned, we’d’ve arranged a parade.

  40. happyfeet says:

    Today I went looking for what had been the largest concrete structure in the whole whirl in 1903.

    Found it!

    http://m.flickr.com/lightbox?id=8022290128

    That is a pic… It’s still used today… I got a picture there of the top part too and also the very leaky underside.

    The carlsbadders light it up at night but I didn’t linger.

Comments are closed.