Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber won’t even discuss clemency for a man convicted of collecting rainwater, yet he’s forcing a reprieve on a convicted murderer – who wants to be executed.
Democrat Gov. Kitzhaber has granted a reprieve “for the duration of my service as governor”
to Gary D. Haugen, who has twice been convicted of aggravated murder. Haugen – who wants to be executed – was first convicted of killing the mother of his girlfriend and later was found guilty of murdering a fellow inmate.
Meanwhile, Gov. Kitzhaber’s office won’t even discuss the possibility of granting any form of clemency to Gary Harrington, who is scheduled to begin serving a 30 day jail term this week – for collecting rainwater his (Harrington’s) own property.
Gary Harrington of Eagle Point, Ore., was sentenced July 25 in Jackson County Circuit Court to 30 days in jail and over $1,500 in fines for violating Oregon state laws that say all water is publically owned–making the 3 reservoirs on his property used to house rainwater and snow runoff illegal.
CNSNews.com has repeatedly contacted the governor’s office via phone and email to ask if the governor has any intention of pardoning Harrington or commuting his sentence. But the governor’s office has not responded to any of those inquiries.
And, while Harrington is scheduled to begin serving his jail sentence on Wednesday (Aug. 8) despite appealing his conviction, Haugen has waived his available appeals regarding his sentence.
Haugen has even filed a lawsuit against Gov. Kitzhaber seeking judicial intervention to invalidate the reprieve and allow the state to execute him. Haugen claims that state law allows him to refuse the reprieve.
In his report to the Oregon Legislative Assembly, Gov. Kitzhaber acknowledges that Hauber has waived his right to appeal his death sentence. But, the governor continues to fight Hauber’s lawsuit, insisting he does not need Hauber’s permission to grant the reprieve.
Since I’m getting bored explaining such statist elected officials, let me distill it quickly: communalism upheld, of necessity, by a leftist, to prove fidelity to the tribe; private property invalidated; individual autonomy (in both cases) invalidated. Power is what matters here: the power to pardon, the power not to pardon, the power of life and death, the power to determine property rights and the “theft” of rainwater from the common weal.
Even if a pardon to the rainwater man does eventually come, it will be a pardon granted with the emphasis on the goodliness of the granting, not on the surreal nature of the arrest and prosecution. Some of that is not the Governor’s fault — the law is what the law is in Oregon, and the people need to work to change the law, if that’s what’s necessary — but the usage of pardon power here is still instructive.
It’s who they are. It’s what they do.
A crime against another subject is forgivable; against the State, unpardonable.
I hope that there are at least a couple of honest journalists who will pepper every press conference from the governor’s staff with questions like “Does the Governor still believe that collecting rainwater is worse than murdering two people in cold blood?”
Forget it, Jeff – It’s Oregon.
What? And be denied Access?