So. I just watched Nancy Kanwisher, an MIT professor of brain and cognitive science (gulp!), and Sam Halabi, a Harvard law student, being interviewed about their support for this colossally asinine MIT-Harvard divestiture petition by FOXNews’ Neil Cavuto. The essence of the position being championed by these two jargon-slinging, pseudo-informed buffoons (once you cut through all the obligatory tripe about “root causes,” “occupation,” and “humiliation,” blah blah blah) is this: “we are smarter than the Israelis, and we know better than they do how to end the suicide attacks plaguing their country. After all, we’re ivy league thinkers, whereas they’re mostly, well, Jews…” The “peace” strategy offered by these nutjobs? Stop all U.S. monies to Israel! That way, you see, Israel would be forced to defend itself diplomatically rather than militarily. And diplomacy is the one thing the always-ready-to compromise Arabs will happily respond to. Would the Arab world take advantage of Israeli military weakness to slaughter the Jews and drive the Jewish state into the sea? Of course not! Because this whole li’l conflagration is all about “humiliation,” not hatred.
To which my reponse was, “Uh, do they not get cable in the North East? Or at least have access to reliable history books?”
I mean, how could these highly educated people be so sure of themselves — and yet be so absolutely wrong? How? How?
And then I came upon the answer, courtesy of a story I found via Common Dreams, of all places. An excerpt:
Nancy Kanwisher, an MIT professor of brain and cognitive science and one of the petition’s organizers, said she had been ‘politically dormant’ until she saw photographs of the Jenin refugee camp, where Palestinians allege Israeli forces massacred hundreds of civilians and violated the international laws of war during a three-week siege.
‘I looked to see where the protest was, and I couldn’t find it,’ she said. ‘I was shocked’ [my emphasis]
Got that? Go on, read it again. I’ll wait.
Or better still, allow me to translate it for you. Says Ms. Kanwisher (in essence): “To be honest with you, I didn’t follow the Middle Eastern situation until quite recently. But then someone brought to my attention some really scary pictures of rubble and tanks and empty clothes lines, and so — engaging in no research of my own, but rather content to rely on inter-department hearsay, the European press, and Palestinian propaganda (since disproven) — I became quite convinced that a massacre had indeed occurred, and that hundreds of Palestininian civilians had been slaughtered by the IDF (or as I like to call them, ‘the evil tank people’). So I decided to act.”
Working with a Harvard faculty friend and input from Chomsky, Kanwisher modeled the petition after one organized at Princeton University. It states that signers are ‘appalled by the human rights abuses against Palestinians at the hands of the Israeli government,’ and that they ‘find the recent attacks on Israeli citizens unacceptable and abhorrent.’
‘But these do not and should not negate the human rights of the Palestinians,’ the petition adds.
Translation: “Sure, exploding Arabs are bad, too — but more importantly, we believe that there’d be no exploding Arabs if the Jews would just stop defending themselves. Because every time the Jews defend themselves, they do so against Arabs. And that’s just racism, plain and simple.”
Paul Nemirovsky, a doctoral student at MIT who grew up in Israel, said he thinks many of the professors who signed the petition don’t understand both sides of the Israel-Palestinian conflict. He wrote a response pointing out that other nations responsible for ‘infinitely larger’ civilian casualties haven’t been similarly condemned, and sent it out by e-mail, he said.
‘I felt hurt for who I am, as an Israeli and a Jew,’ he said of reading the petition. ‘It was the first time in my adult life that I ever felt these things mattered … What I really hated about it was the fact that they’re using the name of an institution that is by definition apolitical.’
Sorry, Paul. But when Ms. Kanwisher is able to marshal against you such overwhelming evidence as “the Palestinian propaganda mill told me so — and they have pictures to prove it!” — what can you do?
Except maybe email the goofy dunce these photos. And this story.
And the link to these documents.
Not that it’d do much good.
Idiots.

What’s even funnier is that these numbskulls think that, deprived of U.S. assistance, the Israelis would just roll over and offer Arabs whatever they want, and wait to be slaughtered.
Quite the opposite would happen. With no alternatives, nothing further to lose, and no one to stop them, the Israelis would become much more aggressive, and hit hard before their military deteriorates. Obvious strategic targets would be the Sinai peninsula (land, oil, harbors, natural gas), both sides of the Suez canal (shipping revenues), and even a possible expulsion of Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza, as policing them would require too much in needed military resources.
The day the Israelis have nothing to lose, I wouldn’t give a rusty nickel for the fate of its Arab neighbors.
Unbelievable. That this woman is a professor of brain studies at Harvard is just too good. Excellent report.
She’s a professor of brain studies at MIT, thank you very much (we have enough nutters on this side of the River).
As an alum of MIT (1973) and the son of another (1942) I cannot tell you how pissed off I am about Ms. Kanwisher and her fellow idiots. Jeff has hit the nail on the head—this is Jew-hatred pure and simple, why else call for divestiture of companies investing in Israel and ignore all the other countries with far, far worse human rights records? I can only call on the ‘Tute to fire her and the others; tenure surely does not protect the peddlers of vicious Jew-hatred.
One of the best things I’ve read on your site, Jeff. My question is, can we just ignore these academidiots?
Couldn’t Larry Summers work on shipping off all specious Cambridge types to Princeton so they would all be corralled in one convenient, watchable spot? It worked for West.
Loved the commentary to your TV set: don’t they get cable TV in the NE? I think news anchors should be required to ask this question to useful idiots like our ‘brain’ scholar.
’I looked to see where the massacre was, and I couldn’t find it.’
Whaddaya mean “our side of the River”?? Last time I checked, MIT and Harvard on both on the same side of the Charles!
More importantly, I’m curious whether brain and cognitive science has any links to linguistics. Or, to put it in Chomsky-ite terms, would the power preponderance of Noam be sufficient to corral members of his department into signing onto a petition he approved? (I’m sure academic freedom, respect for dissent w/in the academy, and a desire to maximize debate in universities would prevent any such pressure from <b>actually</b> happening, but this is just a hypothesis.)
Actually Harvard spans both sides of the river. But more to the point, not all of us that attend those schools are idiots. Check out this link: <a href=”http://harvardmitjustice.org.”>http://harvardmitjustice.org.</a>