Hopefully something like, “Ghhad. What a prick.”*
update: “I mean, like, ewww, what did I ever see in that guy…?”*
Search
Archive Calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |
Archives
Categories
- A Government That Can Force You to Buy Health Insurance Can Make You Do Anything (3)
- a protein wisdom philosophy primer (3)
- academics (25)
- armadillo (8)
- Friday Fiction 100 Word Challenge (51)
- from the protein wisdom conceptual series (136)
- identity politics (33)
- If Republicans Win the Senate in 2014 (1)
- in which celebraties comment on current events (67)
- language / intentionalism (88)
- legal (6)
- My brief conversations with inanimate objects (130)
- NSA / FISA (46)
- One Term to Serve, the 2012 Revival (6)
- Overheard in a Fallujah bunker (27)
- Poems from 196x, Revised by the Ghost of Richard Brauti (27)
- protein wisdom's DNC coverage (30)
- protein wisdom's RNC coverage (29)
- protein wisdom: the movie Lists (20)
- Provocateurism (16)
- real-time empirical observations (51)
- red pills found behind the sofa cushions (42)
- Scenes from my driveway (61)
- Talking back to 80s music (41)
- The Martha Stewart Chronicles (58)
- The protein wisdom interviews (10)
- The protein wisdom original poems (142)
- Uncategorized (20,046)
- Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance, abridged (34)
Recent Comments
- In The Mailbox: 02.28.23 (Afternoon Edition) : The Other McCain on Hey, longtime pw readers…
- In The Mailbox: 12.23.22 : The Other McCain on Patrick J. Carroll truly IS a sad, embittered psychopath
- Danger on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
- Danger on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
- In The Mailbox: 07.18.22 : The Other McCain on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
Yeah, what a prick.
Of course, Len Levitt, he’s a genuine Jewish puppeteer.
True enough Jeff, Nadar has become as unhinged as Gore, but using a Tom Robbins character to attack Nader? Isn’t that like quoting Barbra Streisand to attack Michael Moore?
But in the book, Nader was her secret love. She idolized him. Worshipped him. Attended conferences hoping to meet him.
Of course, that was before she knew he was throwing his lot in with the jihadi-enablers.
Right, my point, though, is that Robbins has given screedy anti-Bush interviews (like this one with the eager Seattle Weekly-http://www.seattleweekly.com/features/0310/news-shapiro.php), ostensibly agreeing with Nader’s anti-Iraq war viewpoint. So, it seems a little disengenous to employ one Lefty to deride another–minor point, I know. But now that you bring it up, wasn’t Robbins’ other character in that book a bomb-throwing, wanted felon who spent much of his time devising IEDs? Hhmm, so Robbins has a history of making heroic protagonists of terrorists? Where is Ashcroft when you need him!?? I demand crushing of dissent!
Ah yes, Bernard Mickey Wrangle, the last of the pure outlaws…
Regardless of Robbins’ anti-Bush screeds and Nader-humping activism, he can’t control the Princess today. And as a genuine human rights activist, Leigh-Cheri is sickened by the anti-Semitism Nader has recently wrapped around himself like a blanket.
If Tom doesn’t distance himself from such munge, I hope the Princess will distance herself from him, too. I hear the sock, the stick, and the can of beans have already told Tom to take a flying fuck. So.
damn! now I’m itching for a smoke. Now, where did I leave that pack of Camels?