She’ll be highlighting community involvement in the lives of the collective and villages that raise children — likely as a disinterested news person who has no particular political point of view, and so is perfect for a mainstream press outlet that is meticulous about upholding standards of impartiality and objectivity when it comes to presenting the news.
Journalism!
Ugly people shouldn’t be allowed on TV.
Because every day, the president of a major TV network’s news division meets with 20-somethings who have never worked a day in their lives and offers them blank checks.
Wow. “Raising her profile” but the public wasn’t aware of it? Then who was she “raising her profile” among?
What does Meggy Mac contribute to MSNBC? A vast cleavage for them to use in white-balancing their cameras?
Fire them all. Make them work for their positions.
She is the 1%.
In my book, this is not ugly. Not breathtakingly gorgeous, certainly, but not ugly by any stretch of the imagination. If I’d met a girl that looked like that in college, I’d have been attracted.
To begin with, anyway.
Jeff, are you sure you didn’t mean Journo-lism?
And Chelsea is almost 32, which is the new 22, so no biggy. She’s got her whole life in front of her, the dear.
You’d have been the perfect wing man in college, slart.
Bad angle, purposely didn’t truthfully reveal the receding socialist chin.
So – it it fair to ask her about Monica now? She’s a “professional”, right?
If only.
Hmmmm …. might have to rework this, then. )
proteinwisdom.com/?p=11042
In USSA, you don’t ask the questions. The questions ask you.
Holy crap, that was a long time ago, serr8d. Back before daleyrocks went completely MLA on us.
And I was just thinking about Nishi, a few minutes ago, wondering how she likes her hip, cutting-edge party now? And whether she realizes that, being in the upper 1%, self-esteem-wise, that she’s going to be practically compelled to share?
Slart, I’ve wondered that many times over the last three years.
I don’t go out of my way to criticize Chelsea Clinton’s appearance because she didn’t pick her parents. But when someone makes a point of claiming that she is attractive – yeah, um, not really.
So she’s jumped from McKinsey & Co to Hedge Funding to TV. Can’t hold down a jobby job is all that resume tells me. Like the Boss’s idiot son in law being shopped from one department to another.
sbf wrote:
Me, I’d prefer a girl who didn’t have yellow teeth.
What, NBC couldn’t get Maria Shriver back? I hear that she’s available again.
sbf wrote:
FTFY
Chelsea Clinton is about as “beautiful” as Sarah Jessica Parker. What is her POV going to be on NBC? Is she recused from flaking for her mom and the current administration? Will she give us fashion and insider trading tips? Will she admit to Diane Sawyer that she married her husband because she was panicing about being an old maid but things just aren’t working out? Will she interview Bill’s current squeeze?
Inquiring minds want to know.
sbf wrote:
In college meaning “when I’d [insert vulgar slang term for fornicate here] anything in a skirt.”
Eh, I wouldn’t call Chelsea beautiful, but ugly is a stretch.
I know nothing about her actually, a mark in her favor btw, but I guess that’s about to change.
Something tells be she will remain head and shoulders above the McCain spawn, dignity and intellectual wise…
In college meaning “when I’d [insert vulgar slang term for fornicate here] anything in a skirt.”
Scotsmen, beware!
That was never me, more’s the pity. Not that I regret only having had one girlfriend there, or having been faithful to her.
bitch is on tv cause she didn’t study hard in school
simple as that
You have the soul of a poet, ‘feets.
I just think she’s painfully obviously defining success down
nobody in her position wants to end up a common common broadcast network tv whore
but this Chelsea person… she has made choices in the past and now she and we are seeing the consequences
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, feets. Try not to read too much into things.
…other times it’s a convenient marital aid.
He’s the protein misogynist!