Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

"Breaking: California High-Speed Rail Boondoggle Now Officially Texas-Sized"

Bullet trains to nowhere. Unless your destination is, say, staggering waste and then, ultimately, bankruptcy.

In which case, all aboard! Nick Gillespie, Reason:

Three years ago, voters were sold a project that was gonna cost $43 billion, which now costs $66 billion in 2010 dollars, but the actual cost is gonna be $98.5 billion, if everything goes faster than Carl Douglas doing some kung-fu fighting and the whole system is up and running by 2033? Not to worry, though, because the very best people in the California government and heavily subsidized business community and at the Obama White House are all over it.

Where’s the line in the “business plan” that says all numbers are placeholders until a new form of scientific measurement is developed to calculate the amount of bullshit included in these estimates?

It’s a statist thing, Nick. You wouldn’t understand.

22 Replies to “"Breaking: California High-Speed Rail Boondoggle Now Officially Texas-Sized"”

  1. Blake says:

    I’m looking forward to the bullet train. Especially after someone decides to ride the train from LA to SF then turns around and drives back to LA, discovering in the process that driving a car or taking the train makes no difference in the amount of travel time.

  2. happyfeet says:

    you have to remember LA spent billions building a subway that couldn’t go to the airport cause of the union whore taxi bitches whined and whined

  3. cranky-d says:

    I didn’t know the LA train didn’t go to the airport. That’s some world-class stupidity. At least the dumb train in Minneapolis goes to the airport.

    I guess I shouldn’t call it dumb. I’m pretty close to a station, and I use it all the time. However, the new line they’re building that will connect downtown Minneapolis to downtown St. Paul? Dumb.

  4. happyfeet says:

    I use the subway when I can but that’s not very often… I got to use it the other day to meet friends in Hollywood for dinner … a lot of the places it goes have no night life and you have to be careful cause last train is like at 11 – midnight

    but California is very familiar with rail scandals – Government Motors ass-fucked the California rail system many many moons ago

  5. mojo says:

    Hey, what about all those thousands and thousands of Californians who desperately need to get from Bakersfield to Barstow on a damn big hurry, huh?

  6. dicentra says:

    Quoth Jonah:

    People are going to feel pretty dumb in 2033 when they finish high speed rail two years after invention of teleportation technology.

  7. dicentra says:

    Utah’s train system is pretty good, but that’s mostly because the geography (mountains on the east, lake on the west) constrains the cityscapes to a long, narrow corridor. The commuter trains come in from the north and south and land downtown (where it’s a hassle to drive), plus one goes to the U of U, and they’re building some short spurs to the airport and a couple to the west.

    Trains are lovely if you’ve got the population density to support them; otherwise, they’re just a proggy pipe dream.

  8. Dave in SoCal says:

    Here’s how the AP helpfully summarizes this story:

    The new business plan for California’s high-speed rail system shows the nation’s most ambitious state rail project could cost nearly $100 billion in inflation-adjusted funding over a 20-year construction period, far above the amount originally projected.

    The plan, which was shared late Monday with The Associated Press, also shows the system would be profitable even at the lowest ridership estimates and would not require public subsidies to operate.

    Profitable? And no public subsidies needed to operate? I think that will make it the first passenger rail line in like, forever, to do either. Or they’re using some imaginary math in their calculations.

    A couple of amusing comments from the link:

    John Edward Plunket
    Great news that the system will be completely self-supporting. In a related story, pigs growing wings and cleared for takeoff.

    Stephen Hastings
    We are a great and big country and we do great and big things. Anyone who has had the opportunity to ride the European rail system would not hesitate to spend the money.

    In response:

    Michael Junk
    And we have Great and Big pension promises and Great and Big unfunded mandates which have left us with Great and Big holes in our budgets. Time to check back into reality.

  9. cranky-d says:

    Here, the train is being built because progressives like trains. There is already a bus line that will take you where you want to go, and it’s far cheaper to run. And, since the train is basically going to run down the middle of the street that connects the two cities, traffic will be much worse than it already is. Progress!

  10. he system would be profitable even at the lowest ridership estimates and would not require public subsidies to operate.

    $700 ticket per person, per stop.

  11. mojo says:

    Dave: Burlington-Northern – the only profitable railroad in n. america

  12. Squid says:

    Don’t get me started, cranky. I currently live three blocks from a bus line that takes me straight downtown. Once the toy train is up and running, Metro Transit will remove all the east-west routes, and replace them with “improved” north-south routes that will take one to a train station. This means that I’ll have the privilege of walking farther to catch a southbound bus, so that I can stand around in an open-air drug market platform ’til the next train comes by. I’m guessing my commute time will go from 20 minutes to at least 30 minutes. Most of the extra time will be standing-around-and-waiting time, which, when added to my longer walking distance, will make those thirty-below-zero days extra-extra special.

    And if I decide to drive in my car, I’m still screwed. I live north of University Ave, which means that for years to come, I’ll have the privilege of sitting at the stoplight, waiting for the damn trains to clear the intersection so that I can get to Cub or Target or I-94. Not that I’d ever need to get to such places. On the bright side, I won’t need to head to University to visit any of my local watering holes or mom-and-pop storefronts, because they’re all going out of business while the street is impassible.

    And to think, all this joy and rapture is only costing me a billion dollars!

  13. cranky-d says:

    I live near Hiawatha. Crossing Hiawatha is exciting because you never know when a train will hold up traffic. Crossing University will be even more exciting.

    I use the train all the time, but I would have used the bus in its place, and that billion dollars wouldn’t have been spent.

  14. Squid says:

    My best friend lives on 38th Street a bit east of the line. Any time I head out to pick up some dinner at Ted Cook’s, my parting words to the gang are, “I’ll be back in five to forty minutes!”

  15. cranky-d says:

    I just watched a video on the project because I was wondering how they are going to handle traffic on Washington on the East Bank. As it turns out, their solution is to only allow buses and bicycles. A nice Utopian mall, none of those nasty private vehicles. Progress!

  16. Blake says:

    I was in Minneapolis a few years ago for a business trip. I couldn’t believe how much the trains had screwed up a downtown that used to be pretty easy to get around in.

    How is ridership on the light rail? Used pretty heavily?

    I ask, because even when I lived in Minneapolis proper (Linden Hills to be exact) I worked in the suburbs. The only reason I went downtown was to drink. Which I managed to do on a frequent basis. My point being that light rail, for me, would have been about as useful as socks on a rooster.

  17. Blake says:

    I thought Nicollet Mall was kind of cool when I lived there. Probably because it was on the way to my favorite drinking establishments But Washington Ave.? Are they nuts?

  18. newrouter says:

    in other minneapolis news

    The Tenth Commandment billboard

  19. guinspen says:

    Burlington Northern

    Now part of Burlington Northern Santa Fe.

    …the Fort Worth-based railroad reported a 20 percent increase in 2010 revenue and a 38 percent gain in operating income, topping $4.5 billion.

    Norfolk Southern, among others.

    The Norfolk, Va.-based railroad operator reported [3rd quarter, 2011] net income of $554 million, or $1.59 a share, on revenue of $2.89 billion.

  20. McGehee says:

    My great-grandfather (I think) worked on one of the railroads that’s become part of BNSF, and my wife’s great-grandfather was killed in a train accident while working for the Norfolk & Western which is now part of Norfolk Southern.

  21. SDN says:

    Contrast that with Rick Perry in Iowa:

    Iowa governor Terry] Branstad: What we would like to know — the wind energy tax credit is going to expire, it has expired three times previously. Senator Grassley has been a real champion of this. We would like to see it extended for four years. Would you support extending that? And also would you support retaining the renewable energy standard which has helped us reduce our dependency on foreign oil?

    Perry: I happen to believe the federal government needs to be completely out of the energy business picking winners and losers and let me share with you why. In exchange to get rid of all of those regulations that are out there and whether you’re in the oil and gas business and the tax credits that they get, whether you’re in the ethanol business and the renewable fuel standard or whether you’re in the wind side, from Washington, D.C. I do not think it is the federal government’s business to be picking winners and losers and frankly on any of our energy sources. I mean, these two solar debacles that we’ve seen are pretty good examples of that. But if a state wants to, which is what we did, Terry, we put into place in the state of Texas an incentive for renewables and the wind energy came in and took great advantage of that, that’s the reason we became the number one wind energy producing state in the country. I think if states want to compete against each other by putting those types of standards, those types of incentives in place that is a correct and a proper way for the state. But at the federal level I do not believe that the bureaucrats in Washington, D.C. ought to be picking winners and losers in the energy industry or for that matter in any other industry.

  22. Shouldn’t they rename the bullet train the wizard train out of respect for cultural sensitivities? You know, like the Baltimore NBA franchise.

    Commuter trains, wizard trains, etc., are just another manifestation of wanting the US to be more like Europe, distances, standard of living, and population density notwithstanding.

Comments are closed.