Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

"Don’t Believe the Presidents' Men In Solyndra Investigations"

I’m sorry, are there people who do? Tim Cavanaugh, Reason:

In image management terms, the administration’s handling of Solyndra has been disastrous. Obama press secretary Jay Carney claimed last week that the president has not been briefed on the scandal, which is either an absurd lie or a terrifying truth. The Energy Department failed to put forward a complete and coherent narrative during last week’s House Commerce and Energy Committee hearing, or for that matter to field officials who were actually involved in the original loan. (Both Department of Energy loan executive Jonathan Silver and deputy Office of Management and Budget director Jeffrey Zients took their respective jobs after the Solyndra loan was decided in March 2009.)

[…]

Though the common view of P.R. flacks is that they lie for a living, effective crisis management requires that you make your factually accurate version of the story public, in a form that is thoroughly vetted and documented so you won’t have to walk any of it back. The Obama team is clearly not doing this, and since the scandal broke – almost entirely as a result of the investigation by House Republicans – the Department of Justice, the Department of Energy and as of last week the Department of the Treasury have all made very public moves to look into Solyndra.

Justice and Treasury at least have a lengthy pedigree. But the plain fact is that these are all executive branch departments answerable to the president, and the issue at the heart of Solyndra is the executive branch’s apparent dereliction in its stewardship of public funds approved by Congress.

Solyndra CEO Brian Harrison and CFO W.G. “Bill” Stover are scheduled to testify to the House Wednesday, and the Democrats appear to be backing into a strategy of vilifying the company (previous efforts to blame perfidious China and wish the story into a cornfield having failed).

— Don’t forget that it was Bush’s fault, too. Which, I guess that’s maybe a given at this point? —

It’s tempting to revile these executives, whose lobbying efforts were unseemly even by Washington standards and who might have milked the taxpayers for an additional $469 million had the investigation by Rep. Fred Upton (R-Michigan) not shed light on the company’s dire finances.

But it is highly suspicious that an administration whose highest officials claim not to have discussed and not to remember Solyndra has so quickly decided to start a wide criminal probe against the company.

It’s also unnecessary. All the important news about the Solyndra episode has originated with the House investigation. Congressional oversight power is working well in this case, and the open nature of a legislative investigation creates a better forum for discussing the folly of corporate subsidies more generally and the campaign for “green jobs” that is turning out to be as empty as Van Jones’ soul. That Solyndra came to light at all is another example of the virtues of divided government and another reason to suspect any efforts to help by an administration that has its hands full spinning the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms’ “Fast and Furious” scandal.

The fact that bad news makes the news networks does not automatically create a law enforcement interest. And the Obama Administration has squandered any presumption of good faith in its handling of this matter. For both of these reasons, the executive branch should butt out and focus its energies on providing accurate responses to the House inquiry.

Yeah, well. This is the Obama Administration — a hotbed of intellectual entitlement and practical corruption. And to paraphrase Will Muny, should‘s got nothing to do with it.

The legacy press — all in in their orchestrated sycophancy and pro-“progressive” advocacy — is doing its best to take the legs out from under the scandal, even at a time when Obama, having demonstrable thrown away hundreds of millions of tax payer money in this particular instance of governmental intrusion into the market alone, is demanding even more of the tax payer and pretending that such tribute would create jobs.

Personally, I look at it this way: motherfucker owes us some coin. If he can’t raise it himself, he can steal it from his favored constituents. And if that means cutting a bitch’s unemployment insurance, or telling the teacher’s union they need to cut payroll, so be it.

I’m willing to make that shared sacrifice.

****
update: Second top Obama fundraiser linked to Solyndra.

Would somebody dust of Woodward and Bernstein, get them a yogurt and a Centrum, and put them on this? Please? Because it ain’t like Kevin Drum or Ezra Klein or George Stephenopolopuphagus is going to do any kind of real reporting…

5 Replies to “"Don’t Believe the Presidents' Men In Solyndra Investigations"”

  1. Squid says:

    I need to get a gig making campaign commercials for the 2012 elections. It’s gotta be the easiest job in the history of broadcasting.

  2. Art Dealer: “It’s a great business. I ask him to find me a Matisse, he brings in a Matisse.”

    Columbo: “Just like that.”

    Art Dealer: “Just like that. He said he had contacts all over the world willing to sell masterpieces on consignment.”

    Columbo: “Did he ever mention who these contacts were?”

    Art Dealer: “Oh no, no, no. When you’re dealing with someone who can afford a Matisse, you don’t have to ask questions. This is rarefied air Lieutenant.”

    Columbo: “Oh, you’re right. I certainly wouldn’t know anything about that. I couldn’t afford a new mattress, much less a..what did you call it? a Mattis”

    Art Dealer: “Matisse”

    Columbo: “Right. Very pretty picture. Is it old?”

    Art Dealer: “Painting. Yes, very.”

    Columbo: “Expensive too, I bet.”

    Art Dealer: “Extremely. It’s a masterpiece”

    Columbo: “Bet you had to mortgage the farm to get it, right?”

    Art Dealer: “Actually, I got a fantastic deal. One of the reasons I always used him, he was extraordinarily reasonable. Now, I’m very busy and must get back to work. Good Day, Lieutenant.”

    Columbo: “Oh sure, sure. My apologies. I have lots to do too. Left my other coat at the cleaners. Got ink on it. Can you believe that?…”

    Art Dealer: “Yes..”

    Columbo: “Bet you can, you’re an observant guy. Uh… one more thing if you don’t mind… did he ever tell you that the paintings he was selling you were reported stolen?”

    Art Dealer: “Stolen? He lied to me!”

  3. LTC John says:

    “…get them a yogurt and a Centrum…” Make that a Centrum Silver. They ain’t getting any younger.

    It seems like we are trapped in a 4 year long Mike Royko column about City Hall – but it the White House instead. Gah.

  4. LTC John says:

    it is about the White House. Sigh, even with preview, I am the suXxor.

  5. SDN says:

    Is there anyone who actually believes that these “investigations” were started for any other reason than to swoop in, seize the evidence so it could be disappeared, and then piously “refuse to comment on an ongoing investigation” while blasting the Republican Congress for “interfering” in said investigation?

    Because anyone who says they believe that should be in a rubber room in an “I love me” jacket.

Comments are closed.