Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Archives

Does George Will have a happyfeet problem?

Because there’s something about conservative woman and the “button” that really twists Will’s bow tie.

First, with Palin, Will seemed to intimate that not having gone to the right schools — or not coming from the right kind of background — redounded against her as a presidential choice. And while this position surely flies in the face of the quintessentially American notion that any child can grow up to be President (luckily for Mr Obama, minorities are encouraged to attend those “right schools,” often at the expense of those with better academic records, suggesting that, at least in this instance, Will seems to be a conservative champion of race-based affirmative action), it is not a position unfamiliar to inside the beltway types, particularly those who, like Will, were initially dubious about Reagan’s fitness and pedigree.

With Bachmann, however, we’re dealing with a woman with advanced degrees, and who — while conservative — has also been a DC politician. So what is it, one is left to wonder, that calls into question her fitness to preside over the nuclear arsenal?

Surely it can’t be her religious convictions: after all, Perry spent some time recently a-swayin’ and a-prayin’ (though I’m certain Will would suggest that he was merely pandering in that instance). So what is it?

I’m tempted to suggest that, for Will, Bachmann is too much of a true believer in conservative principles, and therefore is — as many in the Washington establishment seem to believe — some sort of dangerous zealot. Same for Palin.

Whereas Will’s “top-tier” candidates — recall, these were Romney, Pawlenty, and Huntsman — all have the proper gravitas and willingness to compromise on principles (and pander where necessary), making them peculiarly qualified to control the nukes. Evidently, Perry now falls into that category.

Plus, he doesn’t have a cooter. Which puts George at ease.

I suspect Mr Will is very very nervous and distrustful of a presumptuous vajajay. Since junior high, is my guess.

70 Replies to “Does George Will have a happyfeet problem?”

  1. happyfeet says:

    birds never look into the sun before the day is done

  2. happyfeet says:

    Perry/Haley 2012!

    it’s the future you know you love it

  3. alppuccino says:

    I submit that Palin is doing what I would call a “Buddy Ryan”. Where she is busing around with Obama to get the press to look at her and then these democratic strategists posing as “journalists” will have to decide at some point to cover the real candidates and by then, Rick Perry will have had a chance to beat Obama about the neck and head on his unfitness, and subsequently it will have been too late.

  4. alppuccino says:

    Full disclosure: I prefer a governor to a house member and pussy’s got nothing to do with it.

  5. […] Does George Will have a happyfeet problem? I’m tempted to suggest that, for Will, Bachmann is too much of a true believer in conservative principles, and therefore is — as many in the Washington establishment seem to believe — some sort of dangerous zealot. Same for Palin. […]

  6. happyfeet says:

    Mr. Will has actually a lot for reals acknowledged Bachmann as a top-tier candidate

    In the contest to determine who will wield those words, there have been three important recent developments: Michele Bachmann’s swift ascent into the top tier of candidates, Tim Pawlenty’s perch there becoming wobbly and Jon Huntsman’s mystifying approach to securing a place there.

    Bachmann has been propelled by three strengths. Her natural aptitude, honed by considerable practice, has made her formidable at the presentational side of politics. She has perfect pitch for the nominating electorate’s passions. And she has substantive private- and public-sector experience, as a tax lawyer and as a legislator on, among others, the House Intelligence Committee

    And he doesn’t seem very impressed with Huntsman’s candidacy

    Occasionally, Democratic presidential candidates appeal to people who really don’t like Democrats (e.g., ex-Arizona Gov. Bruce Babbitt in 1988), and Republicans who appeal to people who think Republicans are among nature’s mistakes (e.g., Illinois Rep. John Anderson in 1980). Huntsman seems to be auditioning for this role, which is puzzling, because such people aren’t nominated.

    Huntsman’s campaign manager, John Weaver, a former McCain man, thinks the Republican Party “is nowhere near being a national governing party” — a view usually held by people called Democrats — and that the “simple reason” is: “No one wants to be around a bunch of cranks.” Many of the cranks are called: The Republican nominating electorate.

  7. Ernst Schreiber says:

    No. George Will is a smug, condescending elitist snob. Happyfeet only aspires to smug, condescending elitist snobbery.

    Isn’t it cute how he apes the manners of his betters?

  8. Jeff G. says:

    Mr. Will has actually a lot for reals acknowledged Bachmann as a top-tier candidate

    You mean now that she won the Iowa straw poll and has been running consistently behind Romney at number 2?

    Why, how out on a limb Mr Will is willing to go!

    Early on, recall, Mr Will and others, including Hugh Hewitt (I remember, because we had a back and forth about this), separated out the “top tier” and “serious” candidates for us. By name, these were Romney, Huntsman, and Pawlenty. Pawlenty is now out. And Huntsman has promised he’ll soon have a plan for the economy up on his website; until then, he’s happy to stand on his record. Of having worked last for the Obama administration.

    Will eventually got around to acknowledging Reagan, too. After Howard Baker. And then GHW Bush.

  9. happyfeet says:

    that was from like July

  10. Crawford says:

    Wow. That long ago. It’s amazing human memory can stretch back that far.

  11. Jeff G. says:

    My memory goes back pre-July, when Bachmann was running just behind Romney and wouldn’t fade.

    I’m gifted that way.

  12. happyfeet says:

    Well I think you’re being a tad unfair to our friend Mr. Will plus also the titular pikachu.

    I prefer a governor to a house member

    It sounds like Mr. Will likes governors but skipped over Palin cause she’s sort of a governor-with-an-asterisk.

    But Palin isn’t even running! Dagnabbit she needs to get in the race for so she can prove Mr. Will wrong wrong wrong and do the commonsense conservatism on America … what other candidate has sort-of-writed two whole books and starred in a MOTION PICTURE what was well-received by Robert Stacy McCain?

    That would be precisely uno!

    So c’mon Sarah … buck up or stay in the truck and run run rudolph sarah save the christmas! It’s your time to shine, kitten.

  13. Wm T Sherman says:

    George Will. He has his books, and his boa tree to protect him.

  14. Slartibartfast says:

    I think that Texas A&M and University of Utah are SO the equivalent of Harvard Law, if you also have testicles.

  15. Slartibartfast says:

    It sounds like Mr. Will likes governors but skipped over Palin cause she’s sort of a governor-with-an-asterisk.

    In much the same way that George W. Bush was governnor-with-an-asterisk*.

    *quitty

  16. Wm T Sherman says:

    Beneath the mild mannered yellow exterior lies an angry misogynistic lover of phallus.

  17. Slartibartfast says:

    lover of phallus

    Not that there’s anything wrong with that. Smoke ’em if you got ’em.

  18. Jeff G. says:

    When Perry is out in the Rose Garden singin’ the praises of Jesus on high, swayin’ and a-prayin’ and a-janglin’ his Perrywhacker inside his boxer briefs, we can all pray along with him and thank GAWD ABOVE that he kept the nukes out of the reach of a couple of cranky-ass bitches who should be home cookin’ up some Hamburger Helper for their hardworking men.

    Fishing and turning gays straight is strenuous work. A man gits up an appetite after such a day!

  19. Ernst Schreiber says:

    John Weaver, a former McCain man, thinks the Republican Party “is nowhere near being a national governing party” — a view usually held by people called Democrats — and that the “simple reason” is: “No one wants to be around a bunch of cranks.” Many of the cranks are called: The Republican nominating electorate.

    Ah. But does Mr. Will agree with Mr. Weaver’s characterization or not?

  20. happyfeet says:

    Mr. Governor Perry a lot got Jesus out of his system at his monster truck prayer rally I think. Well, one would hope. At the very least that should tide him over for a good while.

    But his record is mostly about jobs and business climate and freedom. Like 99%.

    The other 1%? What’re you gonna do?

    It’s the times.

  21. Jeff G. says:

    But his record is mostly about jobs and business climate and freedom. Like 99%.

    Sounds like another governor I know.

    Who cut the budget during a surplus, even!

    Of course, you know: she has a vagina. So, like, non-starter.

  22. happyfeet says:

    the only one holding Sarah back is Sarah

  23. McGehee says:

    the only one holding Sarah back is Sarah

    Puts me in mind of a line from a recent Doctor Who episode (paraphrased):

    Villain: “I’m not afraid of a good man — they have too many rules.”

    Doctor: “Good men don’t need rules. This is not the day to find out why I have so many.”

    So, is Sarah holding Sarah back because she has rules, or because she doesn’t need them?

  24. Joe says:

    Has anyone ever seen happyfeet and George Will together?

  25. geoffb says:

    Number of days between today and the Iowa Caucuses, 174.

    Number of days between the Iowa Caucuses and the Republican convention, 202.

    Number of days between the Republican Convention on Aug. 27th 2012 and the Election on Nov. 6th 2012, 71.

    Plenty of time to get into the race especially if you already have name recognition and national coverage.

    Interesting thing about the Iowa Caucuses. Their national prominence and continued national prominence seems to be an artifact of the progressive wing of the Democrats.

    The Iowa caucuses are commonly recognized as the first step in the U.S. presidential nomination process for both the Democratic and the Republican Parties. They came to national attention in 1972 with a series of articles in the New York Times on how non-primary states choose their delegates for the national conventions. Democratic operative, Norma S. Matthews, state co-chair of the George McGovern campaign, helped engineer the early January start for Iowa.
    […]
    While the Democrats have tried to preserve the position of Iowa and New Hampshire in their nominating schedules, the Republicans have not.

  26. sterlinggray says:

    This is getting really interesting with T-Paw out and Bachmann energized. A possible scenario would be if Perry, Bachmann, and possibly Palin get into a 3-way slugfest for the “true believer” vote, which would leave Romney to collect 100% of the RINO vote, unhindered by Pawlenty. I realize that people here think that “RINOS” don’t matter, but they do. I know plenty of stiff upper-middle-class white guys who would think that Romney is a “darned good choice” compared to Perry or Palin. The kind of old-fashioned Republican voter who wouldn’t be caught dead wearing a tricorne hat w. musket accessory or dressed as a giant teabag. Their votes count.

  27. happyfeet says:

    romney is a deal-breaker plus he’s kinda weird

  28. Log Cabin says:

    “Has anyone ever seen happyfeet and George Will together?”

    Joe, that’s not entirely fair. Will may be an elitist RINO squish, but he is an accomplished author and wordsmith.
    ‘Feets just throws out profanities, non sequiturs, and calls Palin a snowbilly bitch.

  29. Jeff G. says:

    Who farted?

  30. happyfeet says:

    plus I’m way better lookin’

  31. sdferr says:

    I think it was the sports spectator.

  32. Jeff G. says:

    I know plenty of stiff upper-middle-class white guys who would think that Romney is a “darned good choice” compared to Perry or Palin. The kind of old-fashioned Republican voter who wouldn’t be caught dead wearing a tricorne hat w. musket accessory or dressed as a giant teabag.

    Really? I wouldn’t expect these types to hang out at Comicon looking at illustrated space cleavage.

    You learn something new every day!

    I wonder, though: what do these types think about giant paper-mache heads, or bandanas and hoodies? That’s the real question.

  33. geoffb says:

    The kibitzer did it.

  34. geoffb says:

    plus I’m way better lookin’

    True, but he spots you over 30 years.

  35. Log Cabin says:

    Because, you know, Sarah kinda deserves it, right HF? I mean, she’s practically asking for it.

  36. pdbuttons says:

    don’t put ‘button’ in your threads
    brings out the crazies

  37. happyfeet says:

    I don’t understand the question

    you can count the politicians I say nice things about on one paw

  38. Pablo says:

    I wonder, though: what do these types think about giant paper-mache heads, or bandanas and hoodies? That’s the real question.

    One’s an easier target, the other more satisfying.

  39. happyfeet says:

    in 30 years I’m a give a bow tie careful thought

  40. pdbuttons says:

    dunkin donuts sells bowties
    they’re sticky sweet

  41. Ernst Schreiber says:

    . A possible scenario would be if Perry, Bachmann, and possibly Palin get into a 3-way slugfest for the “true believer” vote, which would leave Romney to collect 100% of the RINO vote, unhindered by Pawlenty.

    You’ve completely misunderstood Pawlenty’s strategy, such as it was.

  42. bh says:

    I’m surprised no one took the opportunity to disparage Cubs’ fans in this thread.

  43. Benedick says:

    I can’t sign on to the “you dislike X, who is a woman, as a candidate, ergo you must dislike women” line of argument. Sounds a lot like an argument a liberal might make whenever anyone disagrees with a liberal woman, black person, latina, etc.

    I likes me some conservative women — some for whom I would excitedly vote for president. Palin and Bachmann just ain’t among them. But it’s not their cooters that are the problem.

    (Though, note to Bachmann — whom I wish well even though she’s not my top choice . . . ease up on the eye makeup a little.)

  44. J0hn says:

    So, wait, George Will is the enemy now too?

  45. geoffb says:

    Cubs? Sox, all colors are on my list.

  46. geoffb says:

    A possible scenario would be if Perry, Bachmann, and possibly Palin get into a 3-way slugfest for the “true believer” vote, which would leave Romney to collect 100% of the RINO vote, unhindered by Pawlenty.

    That dog won’t Hunt[s]-man.

  47. Jeff G. says:

    No, J0hn. Bachmann and Palin and the TEA Partiers are.

    Haven’t you been paying attention?

    By the way, T-Paw and Huntsman rocked that debate. Man, I’m so STOKED!

  48. LBascom says:

    “So, wait, George Will is the enemy now too?”

    Currently, the ruling class establishment elitists are the enemy of classic liberalism. You go ahead and decide where to place Will in that context.

  49. Mikey NTH says:

    It must be shocking to George that the Republican women who have run or are running for the two top slots are those that are much more passionately conservative than the men. He must find it passing strange that their are no Republican women in the Romney-mold running. I would guess that it is less the genitalia of the candidate and more that both Palin and Bachmann are much more passionate and inspire enthusiasm in the rank-and-file of the Republicans. To someone like George Will inspiring enthusiasm in the rank-and-file is suspect, because who knows what may happen if the those lessers start to think that they are worthy to be in charge and should be given authority and – horrors! – not just symbolic authority, but authority with power.

    I think that he represents a Republican Party power structure that would prefer to govern because that is where all of the treats are, but would prefer to have the Democrats govern if the alternative would be to give up actual authority and power to the rabble in the party’s rank-and-file. Got to maintain that natural order of things, you know.

  50. J0hn says:

    No, J0hn. Bachmann and Palin and the TEA Partiers are.

    Haven’t you been paying attention?

    By the way, T-Paw and Huntsman rocked that debate. Man, I’m so STOKED!

    That’s weird, because I don’t think any of those people are the enemy. Sarcasm is fun though.

  51. Jeff G. says:

    That’s weird, because I don’t think any of those people are the enemy. Sarcasm is fun though.

    Oh. I was just listening to George Will.

    But you’re right, I probably shouldn’t. He’s so divisive.

  52. Ernst Schreiber says:

    So who is the enemy John?

  53. LBascom says:

    A timely essay by VDH:

    That we raise the question at all is a testimony to how thoroughly progressive ideas about governing have permeated our political consciousness. This is obvious from the fact that Democrats are the ones who typically assert the superior intelligence of their candidate over the Republican. Indeed, every Republican candidate since Eisenhower has been characterized as a simplistic ideologue, if not an outright dunce, a tradition that continues with the scorn heaped on Sarah Palin’s intellect and alma mater. […]

    Modern progressive ideology reflects the triumph of Plato’s anti-democratic idea of techno-politics. Hence the belief that a president should have superior intelligence, its presence usually validated by the prestige of university training, the correctness of pronunciation, and the prowess at intellectual name-dropping. But as well as being necessarily undemocratic, this prizing of intelligence has problems. […]

    But do we really need a president to have technical intelligence learned in the university? Isn’t what Aristotle called “practical wisdom” more important, the knowledge of human life and action learned from experience? Who was the better president, the self-educated Abraham Lincoln, or the Princeton graduate Woodrow Wilson? Ronald Reagan, a graduate of obscure Eureka College, or Bill Clinton, holder of degrees from Georgetown and Yale? A life of manifold experience in the real world of challenge, risk, and accountability can create a “practical wisdom” more important for political leadership than is the abstract technical knowledge garnered in the rarefied cloisters of the academy or think-tank, where utopian schemes are never held to the strict test of real-life accountability. […]

    Throughout The Federalist Papers, wisdom and virtue are constantly linked as the necessary qualities for political leadership. Technical skill or knowledge may be necessary for governing, but without practical wisdom and virtue such knowledge and skills are mere mental machinery that can be turned to evil ends as well as good.

    So let’s drop all the discussion of whether this or that candidate or office-holder is “intelligent” or “smart,” something none of us ordinary citizens can know firsthand. Instead, let’s see by their deeds and choices whether they are wise and virtuous.

    Can you imagine a country that trusts the virtue of it’s leaders?

  54. Ernst Schreiber says:

    We traded virtues for values a long time ago, Lee.

  55. Squid says:

    Do you have a point to make, j0hn? As it is, I think this community has spelled out pretty clearly that we don’t have a lot of patience or respect for inside-the-Beltway elitists who seem to think that those of us working for a living and taking care of our families out here in flyover country should be neither seen nor heard. Nor do we appreciate it when the Establishment types seek to tear down and destroy those who would dare to reform the system. A system which desperately needs reforming, but which these privileged chatterers depend on for their positions.

    Is that so cryptic? Is that so controversial?

  56. geoffb says:

    VDH has been busy.

    Barack Obama has hit 39% approval in the Gallup poll. Pundits point to the debt, to the mixed-up foreign policy, to ObamaCare, to his grating sermons on civility, to his blame-Bush fixations, to the serial banality of his inauthentic cadences and his canned Nixonian “make no mistake about it” and “let me be perfectly clear” emphases. All that is true.

    But much of our public weariness stems from his loud liberal hypocrisy. Our president lectures about a certain sort of school he never has sent his child to. He talks about “folks” with whom he has never wished to vacation. Unlike a Truman or Humphrey, he sought office not to help those clingers with whom he might have wished to associate, but to feel good about wanting to help from a safe distance from those with whom he most certainly did not wish to mingle.

    Golfing or walking the Martha’s Vineyard beach, in the fashion of Kerry’s 7th estate getaway or million-dollar yacht, makes one fret over “why lucky me?” — and requires an antidote of one or two spread-the-wealth sermons a week.

    The weird sudden appearance of smarmy, young urban and highly-educated leftist bloggers, with little experience in the physical world or with manual labor, is likewise logical given that most do not raise families in the barrio or shop in the ghetto, or teach school on the wrong side of town or try to buy a house and support three kids on $70,000, or even hit the floor of the Chicago Board of Trade. Only such abstract liberal advocacy can square the circle of self-absorbed concerned metrosexuality.

    As we saw last week in Britain and in some American cities, liberal redistributionism makes far worse the innate problems it was hailed to solve. But it remains a powerful narcotic to an aberrant elite, one that feels guilty over its apartheid circumstances and is desperately seeking spiritual redemption on the cheap.

    Cheap grace, progressiveism’s most plentiful and in demand product.

  57. Swen says:

    42. bh posted on8/15 @ 11:16 am
    I’m surprised no one took the opportunity to disparage Cubs’ fans in this thread.

    Oh, we couldn’t do that. You’ve got to kinda feel for Cubs fans, they’ve got the sporting equivalent of Battered Wife Syndrome. We wonder why they stay in such an abusive relationship, but we have to be non-judgmental and give them all the support we can.

  58. Swen says:

    50. Mikey NTH posted on8/15 @ 1:01 pm
    — snip —
    I think that he [Will] represents a Republican Party power structure that would prefer to govern because that is where all of the treats are, but would prefer to have the Democrats govern if the alternative would be to give up actual authority and power to the rabble in the party’s rank-and-file. Got to maintain that natural order of things, you know.

    Exactly.

  59. Swen says:

    Kinda like Rockies fans. [sigh]

  60. happyfeet says:

    oh my goodness you think you know somebody

    Added Pappas, again lightly rather than angrily: “It was definitely ironic when she was the one complaining about a reporter being sloppy when she was the one being sloppy by complaining to the wrong reporter.”

    […]

    If Palin wants to get rid of the image of being a difficult diva with a rude streak, she needs to stop acting like a difficult diva with a rude streak.

  61. newrouter says:

    i don’t listen to folks named queer hilbilly

  62. newrouter says:

    i don’t listen to the mbm “conservative ” style anymore. put that in your pipe and nro it.

  63. Jeff G. says:

    Sterlinggray seems to have an almost Hitlerian grasp on things “racial.”

  64. Jeff G. says:

    Aw. I like that Quin Hillyer defended his high school pal, a real rising star of the Tucker Carlson bowtie club.

    Seriously, though. Writing a whole goddamned article about it? Somebody wants some traffic — and happy is the target audience, licking it up like the Pavlovian mutt he is!

  65. happyfeet says:

    see no one tells me anything hey did you know that they’re gonna do a buffy season 9? I had to find out by myself on the internet.

  66. happyfeet says:

    oh.

    link

  67. JungleJim says:

    I suspect Mr Will is very very nervous and distrustful of a presumptuous vajajay. Since junior high, is my guess.

    Jeff, thats probably true about George. But your slang expression for female anatomy is outdated. Its now referred to as “vagaga”.

  68. Jeff G. says:

    Its now referred to as “vagaga”.

    Not if you can wear a hat and boots unironically it ain’t.

  69. SmokeVanThorn says:

    Hillyer’s whine has been thoroughly discredited. Just didn’t happen as he claimed. The ultimate proof Little Quin’s wrong: Jennifer Rubin bought the fable hook, line and sinker.

Comments are closed.