Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

Symbolic Marxism

Courtesy Harry Reid and Senate Democrats:

The Senate as early as Wednesday could vote on a “Sense of the Senate” bill that says taxpayers earning $1 million or more each year should “make a more meaningful contribution to the deficit-reduction effort.”

The bill, titled the “Sense of the Senate on Shared Sacrifice,” was introduced last week by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). Reid filed at cloture motion on the bill on Tuesday afternoon, meaning a vote to end debate could take place as early as late Wednesday or, more likely, Thursday.

The bill has no specific recommendations on how much taxes should be raised on high-income earners, and is simply a recommendation that these taxpayers pay more. Because the 60 votes needed to end debate are unlikely to materialize, the vote will likely be used by Democrats as a way to show Republican resistance to new tax hikes.

The irony here? Is that most taxpayers earning $1 million or more each year — at least, those who aren’t Democrat cronies — are making “a more meaningful contribution to the deficit-reduction effort.” By telling Obama and the Democratic socialists — and make no mistake, that’s who they are — to get stuffed.

Opposing Obama is a deficit-reduction effort.

So. You’re welcome, Harry.

30 Replies to “Symbolic Marxism”

  1. cranky-d says:

    And here I am thinking that people who make a lot of money make more of a contribution because they end up paying more taxes in absolute dollar amounts. Silly me.

  2. SDN says:

    They also pay more in terms of percentage of income vs percentage of the tax burden.

    Copperheads are liars. This is news?

  3. Jim in KC says:

    I can smell what the Obama administration is spreading, and it ain’t prosperity.

  4. Squid says:

    I thought that employing people and providing valuable goods and services was a meaningful contribution.

  5. Jim in KC says:

    Not if you make a profit at it, Squid.

  6. Squid says:

    What if I give a chuck of my profits to OFA?

  7. happyfeet says:

    Harry is the greasy union-trash fuckstain what hasn’t been able to pass a budget in over two years, yes?

  8. LBascom says:

    A generous description happyfeet.

    Harry is one of the principle players in turning out beloved country from exceptional into just another European socialist big government fail, only with more butt crack.

    He’s tyranny in a Woody Allen suit.

  9. happyfeet says:

    that was a rhetorical question

  10. happyfeet says:

    we’re in big trouble Mr. lee

  11. Mueller says:

    All bills to raise revenue must originate in the house. Emo-demo grandstanding.

  12. LBascom says:

    “we’re in big trouble Mr. lee”

    We passed trouble in 2006. Remember, we were going to teach the spendthrift republican congressional majority a lesson?

    We passed big trouble in 2007, when we were given a self avowed RINO (what do you think “Maverick” means?)presidential candidate in revenge.

    We’re well into the “fucked” category now.

    Oh, by the way, Did you know we are making war in no less than six Muslim countries? And that none of them are Iran?

  13. happyfeet says:

    “It’s my hope,” Obama told reporters at the White House on Tuesday, “that everybody’s going to leave their ultimatums at the door, that we’ll all leave our political rhetoric at the door, and we’re all going to do what’s best for our economy and do what’s best for our people.”- president bumblefuck, 7/5/11

    7/6/11

    As a top House Republican signaled new flexibility on White House demands to close wasteful or ineffective tax loopholes, President Barack Obama responded with some of his harshest political rhetoric to date in advance of a Thursday negotiating session on the budget.

    Wednesday’s salvo came hours after House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., opened the door to closing wasteful or unfair tax loopholes in the battle over a must-pass proposal to increase the government’s borrowing authority. Obama suggested that Republicans are using the debt limit measure “as a gun against the heads” of Americans to retain breaks for corporate jet owners or oil and gas companies.

  14. LBascom says:

    Happyfeet, you might get a visit from the secret service for mentioning “Obama” and “gun against the head” in the same comment.

    Oops…

  15. LBascom says:

    You know, I never noticed before, but the secret service has very unfortunate initials.

  16. Squid says:

    Unt zay alsso haf vays uff makink you tokk…

  17. happyfeet says:

    if they come tonight I don’t know what I’d have to offer them except Snapple peach-flavored diet green tea and this wretched box of Franzia merlot I bought for in case they ran out at NG’s reception (they had tons leftover as it turned out)

    I guess I’ll try to pawn off the merlot first

  18. geoffb says:

    Here are the new improved Wednesday “just words“. Will their shelf life be greater than a fresh fish in the summer sun? Tomorrow will tell the tale.

  19. LBascom says:

    Boxed wine requires a discriminating pallet. Make sure you have coffee.

  20. geoffb says:

    Cynn is visiting ‘feets?

  21. motionview says:

    Here’s your new civility – Never in our history has the United States defaulted on its debt. The debt ceiling should not be something that is used as a gun against the heads of the American people to extract tax breaks for corporate jet owners, for oil and gas companies that are making billions of dollars because the price of gasoline has gone up so high.

  22. LBascom says:

    motionview is wise to leave Obama from his comment.

  23. LBascom says:

    Fucking happyfeet is probably in the Whole Foods coffee aisle agonizing over the pomegranate/cranberry coffee beans, or the Supulvida blend.

  24. happyfeet says:

    here is the man what makes the majestic space paintings

    it’s sorta kinda cool

  25. newrouter says:

    i think he does that for the paint fumes

  26. newrouter says:

    this i like

    Across America, regulatory policies are actively inhibiting the economic activity that produces revenues for the government. The only way to change that is to lift the burden of regulation. Raising tax rates will merely exert an upward pressure on consumer prices, and drive private money away from the taxable categories that strengthen the economy. Lightening the burden of regulation, however, will unleash the economy to produce, sell, and deliver significantly increased revenues to the government – without raising tax rates. Oh, and it will also reduce government spending. Regulating less means government spending less, on regulators and their infrastructure.

    link

  27. Pablo says:

    Harry is the greasy union-trash fuckstain what hasn’t been able to pass a budget in over two years, yes?

    You meant “propose” rather than “pass”, no?

  28. Trashman Peden says:

    No, Harry, lest your own Progressive movement again be sensed as mere breakfast toast, Social Justice demands that Shared Sacrifice must be Equal Sacrifice!

  29. alppuccino says:

    Campaign video script:

    “Obama thinks that all corporate jet owners do is lay around, go to parties, entertain famous people, spend money on cheeseburgers and Grey Poupon, and play golf every day…………………..(show video clips of Obama’s entire presidency)

    “Do you ever wonder why he thinks that?”

    No charge for this one. You’re welcome Generic Republican Candidate.

  30. Ernst Schreiber says:

    There’s a deficit reduction effort? Has anyone informed Congress?

    No. Seriously. What deficit reduction effort?

Comments are closed.