Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

"Ahoy, Matey, It's the Feds: EPA and Coast Guard Target Air Pollution From Ships"

Good lord. I fucking give up.

Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Coast Guard announced Thursday they will jointly enforce U.S. and international air pollution limits for vessels operating in U.S. waters.

Both the Coast Guard and the EPA “will perform inspections and investigations, and will take appropriate enforcement actions if a violation is detected,” the news release said.

The rules establish limits on nitrogen oxide emissions and require the use of fuel with lower sulfur content. The goal is to protect people’s health and the environment by reducing ozone-producing pollution, which can cause smog and aggravate asthma, EPA said.

[…]

The rules — spelled out in a letter to ship owners and diesel engine manufacturers — also require diesel engines in U.S.-flagged vessels to have an Engine International Air Pollution Prevention (EIAPP) certificate, issued by EPA, showing that the engine meets international nitrogen oxide standards. Certain vessels also are required to have an International Air Pollution Prevention Certificate (IAPP), which is issued by the Coast Guard.

Ship operators must also maintain records on board regarding their compliance with the emission standards, fuels requirements and other provisions of Annex VI.

Annex VI is part of a U.N. Treaty that seeks to reduce pollution from ships. The United States became a party to Annex VI in 2008, and the rules were implemented in the United States through a law called the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships.

This is not about pollution. It’s about control. About government record keeping. For the purposes of keeping tabs on every aspect of private citizenship. And of course, it’s about taking more money to fuel its ever increasing demand for revenue.

Not a single life will be saved by such measures. The ocean won’t be more pristine as a result. All that will happen is that the government, through its unelected bureaucratic agencies, has justified giving itself permission to further harass the individual and to steal more of his money.

How we got so far off course as a society I will never know. But, if you squint a bit, let me suggest that this sheds a kind of oblique light on the thing.

Progressivism.

26 Replies to “"Ahoy, Matey, It's the Feds: EPA and Coast Guard Target Air Pollution From Ships"”

  1. happyfeet says:

    the Coast Guard is without doubt the gayest branch of the armed services

  2. Joe says:

    You have no idea how horrible a U.S. Attorney can make your life if you accidently flip a bilge pump and cause a sheen of oil on the water. Imagine the worse speed cop ever, but whose ticket book can result in massive criminal and civil penalties.

    And now they want to follow you around the world?

    And you wonder why ships get registered in Panama and other countries.

  3. happyfeet says:

    the meter maids of teh sea

  4. dicentra says:

    How we got so far off course as a society I will never know.

    Because it’s sadly inevitable. As human society increases in wealth, we also figure out more nit-picky ways to “improve” our lives by making rules and more rules.

    Until the proliferation of Circumlocution Offices makes rules and their enforcement an end in itself. Wanna throw all those civil servants out of a job and onto the streets?

  5. geoffb says:

    Those who the Progressive left consider their mortal enemies have never changed. Only their names do, bourgeois, kulak, “the rich.” All are always simply the small business person, never the truly wealthy or powerful. Those they co-opt, buy off, get into bed with to destroy their common enemy.

    From the last link.

    Nor was Lochner controversial at the time it was decided. “Of the eight law review articles to comment on Lochner shortly after it was released, seven supported it, some vigorously,” Bernstein explains. “Also contrary to historical myth, newspaper editorial commentary on Lochner was generally supportive.”

    That general opinion would change later, when progressives and elite lawyers enamored of government power found the notion of “liberty of contract”—the central finding in Lochner—an unwelcome obstacle to their practical goals. To the progressives, “abstract legal freedom” needed to give way to considerations of “social policy,” and limitations on government power in the name of constitutional freedoms were old-fashioned.

    Bernstein spends a substantial part of his book describing the way in which an opinion that stopped a joint effort by large corporate interests and big unions to squash small businesses was somehow turned into the centerpiece of a narrative about the Supreme Court upholding big business at the expense of the little guy.

    As before.

  6. Squid says:

    As human society increases in wealth…

    Thank Heavens we’ve jumped off of that path! I know I’m very much looking forward to the coming Subsistence Age. It’ll be so pure, so uncomplicated…

  7. sdferr says:

    To the progressives, “abstract legal freedom” . . .

    Precisely where they topsy-turvy, for this is where it is anything but abstract in the life of a man at work. Far from being “drawn away” from him, this freedom is where law draws toward the man in his fulness.

  8. Bill M says:

    Lisa Jackson,”We don’t want your business, you dirty polluters!!!”

  9. happyfeet says:

    ahoy here is the enabling legislations

    The Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships (APPS, 33 U.S.C. §§1905-1915) is a United States law that implements the provisions of MARPOL and the annexes to which the United States is a party. The most recent U.S. action concerning MARPOL occurred in April 2006, when the U.S. Senate approved Annex VI, which regulates air pollution (Treaty Doc. 108-7, Exec. Rept. 109-13). Following that approval, in March 2007, the House of Representatives approved legislation to implement the standards in Annex VI (H.R. 802), through regulations to be promulgated by Environmental Protection Agency in consultation with the U.S. Coast Guard.

    APPS applies to all U.S.-flagged ships anywhere in the world and to all foreign-flagged vessels operating in navigable waters of the United States or while at port under U.S. jurisdiction. The Coast Guard has primary responsibility to prescribe and enforce regulations necessary to implement APPS in these waters. The regulatory mechanism established in APPS to implement MARPOL is separate and distinct from the Clean Water Act and other federal environmental laws.

    here is the roll call of HR 802 in the House

    among the nays is our friend Michele Bachmann but not our friend Mr. Ryan

    America’s simpering and cowardly senators however refused to go on the record… “Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.”

  10. Bob Reed says:

    I’m sure the Chinese will comply, aren’t you?

    They’ll just call for pilot services from outside the UN recognized international limit(which will be a legal problem in-and-of-itself as we call for a 200 mile limit, but the UN only recognized 12 miles).

    This will lopsidedly only effect US flag vessels, and will serve to hasten the registration of those elsewhere.

  11. Bob Reed says:

    happyfeet,
    You’re being a bit harsh on the USCG by calling them the metermaids of the sea. They do much more than you might think.

  12. happyfeet says:

    Hung Nguyen is a douchey whore what has deeply impressed upon me the sad truth that “Coast Guard” and “honor” are entirely separate and divisible concepts.

  13. geoffb says:

    This is my opinion from knowledge of how the left operates in every place where they can exert influence for the betterment of the cause.

    An effect of the political nature of General Officer promotions is that those of the more activist and leftist political persuasion will be lifted up during a Democrat administration while during a Republican administration the political aspects are not emphasized. This can skew not just the General Officers but those lower down who looking to rise up.

    Wars tend to end the careers of the ones whose rise was only or mainly due to political reasons as it is the final exam for an officer. Can’t bullshit your way to victory over an enemy.

    That there are Officers who look to polish the apples of those who are in political power in order to advance their own prospects is due not to the officers who attempt to game the system but due to the left which has twisted every organization to be of use for their own ends.

    All services including the Coast Guard have honor and should be honored. Any dishonor should rightly fall on those who have monkeywrenched the system for political gain.

  14. happyfeet says:

    In the aftermath of the Macondo accident the Coast Guard became an organization what actively worked to destroy the livelihoods of the good people what live on the coasts they purport to guard.

    I won’t never forget it.

    But speaking of eager participants in bumblefuck’s regulatory ass-rape of America.

    Why is the Food and Drug Administration holding up so many life-saving drugs and devices? According to California Healthcare Institute, clearances for devices are down 43 percent and approval times have lengthened by 75 percent.*

    That’s from a read-the-whole-thing article by a Harvard business professor what rips bumble a new asshole in the pages of the New York Times.

  15. Bob Reed says:

    geoffb,
    I can only speak for the US Navy, but there are faaaaaar too many flag officers (Admirals); there are more than there are operating ships in fleet!

    They could do with half that number, or less. Around a 100 maybe, with an extra 20 for Pentagon/DC duty. Displacing their payroll would make a whole lot of room for some Junior Officers and enlisted Sailors.

    Which, the latter two categories tend to concentrate on proficiency and fighting rather than advancing political agendas.

  16. sdferr says:

    Video on the subject of the particular freedom addressed by the Lochner case.

    Go. — Watch it, it’s only 2 and a half mins.

  17. happyfeet says:

    economic freedom is my favorite

  18. geoffb says:

    Bob,

    From this that is a problem due to Congress.

    Like the other commissioned officer ranks, Congress limits the number of General Officers that can serve on active duty.

  19. zino3 says:

    Jeebus!

    I thought this would be a good day!

  20. happyfeet says:

    it’s in the top 5 this week so far

  21. Carin says:

    You have no idea how horrible a U.S. Attorney can make your life if you accidently flip a bilge pump and cause a sheen of oil on the water. Imagine the worse speed cop ever, but whose ticket book can result in massive criminal and civil penalties.

    A hazmat “situation” can put a company out of business. And it’s “hazmat” if they say it is.

  22. happyfeet says:

    everything is so damn arbitrary

  23. Swen says:

    Claire Wolfe is right, “America is at that awkward stage. It’s too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards.”

  24. B. Moe says:

    So ships that don’t pass emissions will be fined all too hell if they enter our waters?

    I fail to see how putting more impediments on trade is going to help our economy right now.

    Which is a nice way of saying can we start trying these fucking bastards for treason yet?

  25. happyfeet says:

    did anybody read this what Mr. Instapundit linked a few days ago?

    How hard would it be for bumblefuck to use his pliant coast guard meter maid patrol to harass ships going to a not-favored port in a right-to-work state?

    This reflects a long-term shift of money, power and jobs away from both the North Atlantic and the Pacific to the cities of the Gulf. The Port of Houston, for example, enjoyed a 28.1% jump in foreign trade this year, and trade at Louisiana’s main ports also reached records levels.

    […]

    One potential game-changer is the scheduled 2014 $5.25 billion widening of the Panama Canal, which will allow the passage to accommodate ships carrying twice as much cargo as they are able to carry currently. This will open the Gulf to megaships from Pacific Basin ports such as Singapore, Shanghai, Pusan and Kaohsiung, which have mostly sent their cargos to West Coast ports such as Los Angeles and Long Beach. Some analysts predict that more than 25% of this traffic could shift to Gulf and South Atlantic ports. “More of Asia will be heading to this part of the world,” says Jimmy Lyons, CEO of the Alabama State Port Authority.

  26. YouAreNotTheBossOfMe says:

    Wow.

    I suppose I’ll have to stop peeing in the ocean when I drink beer at the beach. Wouldn’t want to be a target of the EPA. Not sure I could swim out into international waters anymore. I’m getting too old.

    Damn, and I was having so much fun.

Comments are closed.