Let the Democrat/establishment GOP push for Mitch Daniels begin!
Because hell, who, if not the Democrats, has our best interests at heart when it comes to picking a “serious” “adult” opponent to run against Barack Obama…?
Search
Archive Calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |
Archives
Categories
- A Government That Can Force You to Buy Health Insurance Can Make You Do Anything (3)
- a protein wisdom philosophy primer (3)
- academics (25)
- armadillo (8)
- Friday Fiction 100 Word Challenge (51)
- from the protein wisdom conceptual series (136)
- identity politics (33)
- If Republicans Win the Senate in 2014 (1)
- in which celebraties comment on current events (67)
- language / intentionalism (88)
- legal (6)
- My brief conversations with inanimate objects (130)
- NSA / FISA (46)
- One Term to Serve, the 2012 Revival (6)
- Overheard in a Fallujah bunker (27)
- Poems from 196x, Revised by the Ghost of Richard Brauti (27)
- protein wisdom's DNC coverage (30)
- protein wisdom's RNC coverage (29)
- protein wisdom: the movie Lists (20)
- Provocateurism (16)
- real-time empirical observations (51)
- red pills found behind the sofa cushions (42)
- Scenes from my driveway (61)
- Talking back to 80s music (41)
- The Martha Stewart Chronicles (58)
- The protein wisdom interviews (10)
- The protein wisdom original poems (142)
- Uncategorized (20,046)
- Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance, abridged (34)
Recent Comments
- In The Mailbox: 02.28.23 (Afternoon Edition) : The Other McCain on Hey, longtime pw readers…
- In The Mailbox: 12.23.22 : The Other McCain on Patrick J. Carroll truly IS a sad, embittered psychopath
- Danger on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
- Danger on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
- In The Mailbox: 07.18.22 : The Other McCain on Patrick J. Carroll might be a psychopath
This has been the topic du jour on Rush. I gotta say, for a guy who wants to bring people together, he’s sure going about it in a strange way.
Who, Rush? What’s strange about it?
Right now Rush is quoting from a speech Reagan gave at a CPAC event before the 1980 campaign.
I was unaware that Barack Obama was a serious adult.
Listening to Juan Williams talk about the Tea Party is about as useful as listening to Obama talk about job creation.
Neither one has the first clue what he’s talking about.
Let the pragmatism begin!!
Because hell, who, if not the Democrats, has our best interests at heart when it comes to picking a “serious” “adult” opponent to run against Barack Obama…?
CP-USA?
Pakistani ISI?
No, don’t tell me… I’ll guess right eventually.
AARP?
In other news, Allen West is telling TEA Partiers to give up on Obamacare repeal.
They say we shouldn’t ask for purity in our candidates, but for the sake of Pete!
If the individual members of the TEA Party can pass “purity tests,” WHY CAN’T OUR EFFING REPRESENTATIVES????!?!?!11
Jihadis?
Why not indeed.
As for how to win elections, I have a suggestion.
I meant Mitch Daniels. As in, for a guy who wants to bring fiscal and social conservatives together so they can win over uncommitted “moderates,” telling social conservatives to “shut up, you’re scaring the moderates!” is a funny way to go about it.
It really sounded to me today like Rush is getting ready to go OUTLAW.
I suspected as much, but the only name named in your comment was Rush’s so I had to ask.
I’m not a fan of “purity tests” but clearly, if the repeal/undermining/destruction of Obamacare is not high on a candidates list of things to do if he wins, well then I’m less inclined to support the candidate.
That being said, I like Allen West alot and I’m baffled by the remark. I hope it was misquoted, taken out of context or its something he can explain.
the boner of the house speaks:
link
Why listen and take seriously as truthful the statements of anyone on the left about any possible Republican candidate for any office but especially for the presidency? Everything said by them should be looked at as propaganda and dis/mis-information designed only to get Democrats more power and control. The media can evolve to different strategies just as other enemies can. They won’t necessarily rerun the same plays as they did in 2008.
Evaluate Republicans/conservatives based on what they have actually said, not spun quotes or misquotes, and what they have done either in office or as private citizens. Basing opinions on what the MSM is putting out is to buy into their game. They have millions to focus group, poll and test out every ploy known to every intelligence outfit ever but especially the ones that the left had and have still.
Now has Daniels said some things that could be used against him. Yes. Since when though is it a good thing to say to a Republican candidate, “Watch what you say as it might be taken out of context or mis-construed or just flat out lied about to use against you.” “Better be careful boy, those words can hurt you.”
Show me the
moneypolicies, ideas, plans, and actions done. Rhetoric, fiery rhetoric is good but actions are what count.Now while you flay me alive I’m out to re-stain the wheelchair ramp while the weather holds.
I meant Mitch Daniels. As in, for a guy who wants to bring fiscal and social conservatives together so they can win over uncommitted “moderates,” telling social conservatives to “shut up, you’re scaring the moderates!” is a funny way to go about it.
The problem isn’t them scaring moderates so much as that their douchey Godbaggery makes for a muddled message about intrusive government.
When talking about the social cons it’s important to focus on the douchey Godbaggy aspects like their square insistence that 14 year old hotties aren’t old enough to get laid and scraped without daddy finding out.
Also, you should have to pay for it. Oppressor!
Keep your vacuum out of my hot teenage daughter, you damn dirty apes! It has a douchey Godbag subtext, but it’s rooted in fuck you! Ergo, it’s full of win.
From the sound of the echoes in this chamber I’m wondering if either side of this rift is ready to win an election. Wake me in 2016.
I’m just waiting for the MSM to tell me who the acceptable candidate is so that I can get back to keeping my mouth shut.
From the sound of the echoes in this chamber I’m wondering if either side of this rift is ready to win an election. Wake me in 2016.
Yup!!
“Wake me in 2016.”
not me: fight all these mfers everyday til we defeat them.
yea and mitchy daniels sucks buckeye dick.
and the buckeye dick is hughhewitt’s
Wouldn’t that be hoosier cock?
“Wouldn’t that be hoosier cock?”
nah throws out cross border grenade. anyway hughhewitt boners thusly”
link
See? By not simply anointing Romney, we’re doing damage to the Republic. We need to get out of the way and let the big boys do big boy things.
Some of us take the representative democracy thing far too literally, it seems.
The idea that anyone is clearly the front-runner, let alone Mittens, is so effing stupid that it should disqualify Hewitt from opining publicly about anything. If ever there was an army with no generals, we’re it.
hey there are books to sell dontcha know:)
I already know who I will support if she runs, but its rediculous that so many on our side want to annoint a nominee instead of going through the process.
What are they afraid of?
hughhewitt used to tout the jenrube when i listened. over at her old stompin’ grounds petey the wehner is singing the the praises of the bushie mitchey:
link
these folks “thoughts” are more of indication of what bobdole they want so to lose “gracefully” to the crease man. eff ’em.
If we’re going to play to lose, then we might as well nominate someone like Ted Nugent and at least have some fun.
“nominate someone like Ted Nugent and at least have some fun.”
nominating a black guy to run against the 2nd black precedent is fun. everything else is bobdole stuff.
the communist’s problem is that we have smarter minorities. ax sheila jackson lee?
There you people go finding divisive common ground. Don’t you realize that if everybody comes together to support one of those teabaggrr candidates, nobody will vote for him?
I’m not ready to throw the towel in yet:
Link
If the establishment doesn’t see the writing on the wall, then they deserve whatever losses befall them.
Mittenz?!?
WHY WON’T YOU ALL WISE UP! RON PAUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(eleventy)
TIN FOIL HATS FOR EVERYONE!11!1!
Bob’s comment brought out a Paultqrd comment. I blame Bob.
Entire text of CPAC speech up at pub.
Speaking of the Pub, I fear its registration process will need to be tightened somehow. There are a couple of new spammers over there, and the two I reported to Jeff yesterday are still shown on the authors’ list.
Like I told Jeff, if anybody’s going to make money off ProteinWisdom.com, it should be him, not these spammers.
Daniels/Huntsman 2012 – smell the pragmatism!
I’m going for Cain right now – piss on teh narrative builders.
And the spammers have been ejected from the Pub. Hooray for bouncers!
I had to figure out how to get in, then I bounced them.
On the plus side, though, my penis is now happily enlarged!
Portobello bruise?
McGehee, by 2016 we’ll be voting with lead ballots (assuming the EPA doesn’t try to ban lead).
I’m not sure I’m going to donate to any candidate this election; I’ve got better uses for my money when nothing is going to be done until the crash anyway.
Jeff still gets his cut, though.