13 Replies to “Well, I said five years doesn't make a bit of difference.”

1. Bob Reed says:

   May 3, 2011 at 9:30 am

   Wait, Pelosi’s a hypocrite? Well then, I’m sure the media will take her to task right away; since hypocrisy is what they insist forces them to write such exposes.

2. Mueller says:

   May 3, 2011 at 9:57 am

   Nancy needs some botox to her vocal chords cause the stuff she already shot up has gone straight to her frontal cortex.

3. Squid says:

   May 3, 2011 at 10:05 am

   The current crop of freshman in Congress, and the next crop that we send there, need to be reminded that the protocols of courtesy and decorum have been subverted to become shields for the extraordinary misbehavior and hypocrisy of the leading cadre, and that’s it’s perfectly all right — necessary, even — for these courtesies to be set aside when it comes time to call out the miscreants.

   Progressive or Establican, I don’t care — the comfortable beasts in the House and Senate need to be challenged. Push back against them; call them out on their lies; make them lose their composure so that their constituents can get a clearer picture of just who it is that represents them.

   It won’t save the Republic, but it’s a step in the right direction.

4. mojo says:

   May 3, 2011 at 10:07 am

   Yes, yes, San Fran Nan is a disgusting opportunistic piece of work. We already knew that. Unfortunately, all her constituents are even crazier and less restrained.

5. Joe says:

   May 3, 2011 at 10:17 am

   When you accept Nancy Pelosi is a partisan lying whore, it all makes perfect sense.

6. agile_dog says:

   May 3, 2011 at 11:34 am

   I think this proves two things. First, yes, Nancy is a two-faced lying hypocrite. And second, most politicans still haven’t learned that the information age/internet makes it really easy for anybody to go back and check the public record. You don’t have to have access to the file copy of the local paper or TV station.

7. Stephanie says:

   May 3, 2011 at 11:38 am

   Amusing, but irrelevant. When gas has gone from an incidental monthly expense (equivalent to a night out on the town) to a major budgeting item (larger than your car payment), it is a BFD.

8. Joe says:

   May 3, 2011 at 11:38 am

   The code name the White House chose for Osama bin Laden in this operation was “Geronimo.”

   No word if anyone is offended.

   Personally I am glad they did not go with “Chief Joseph.”

9. JD says:

   May 3, 2011 at 11:54 am

   The leftists are really making me quite nauseous.

10. Stephanie says:

    May 3, 2011 at 4:09 pm

    Nauseous? You ain’t seen Howard Fineman …

    “By calmly and meticulously overseeing the successful targeting of Osama bin Laden, President Barack Obama just proved himself — vividly, in almost Biblical terms — to be an effective commander-in-chief of the armed forces of the United States.”

11. cranky-d says:

    May 3, 2011 at 4:14 pm

    “By calmly and meticulously overseeing the successful targeting of Osama bin Laden, President Barack Obama just proved himself — vividly, in almost Biblical terms — to be an effective commander-in-chief of the armed forces of the United States.”

    What a load of horseshit. There is no need to attempt to parody them, they take care of that themselves.

12. Stephanie says:

    May 3, 2011 at 4:45 pm

    Does that situation room pic look like someone ‘calmly and meticulously’ overseeing anything? He’s Little Jack Horner stuck in the corner while the adults do the country’s business.

    Plus he looks like he shart himself. Could be why Hillary has her hand over her face.

13. McGehee says:

    May 4, 2011 at 6:36 am

    My whole concept of Nancy Pelosi has been shaken. I need to go lie down.

Comments are closed.