Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

"General: U.S. could send in ground troops"

Wait, what…?

NO WAR FOR OIL!

Of course, on the plus side, if the TEA Party manages a government shutdown, at least we won’t have to pay our soldiers, the imperialist baby killers. So there’s that.

8 Replies to “"General: U.S. could send in ground troops"”

  1. guinsPen says:

    I say we decide using a Time/CNN poll.

    Reader polls are just too unreliable.

  2. bastiches says:

    Haven’t you heard? A little war now and then is good for children and other living things …

    Cutting a $3.12 trillion budget? GENOCIDE! CIVIL FUCKING WAR! HEAT DEATH OF THE UNIVERSE!

  3. the wolf says:

    Since our military now operates at the behest of the UN, their pay should come from UN coffers.

  4. BuddyPC says:

    American military intervention is acceptable only if there isn’t any hint of commercial interest.

    That’s a straight quote, from a transnationalist-type leftist acquaintance of mine, several years ago when I tried, in detail, to explain to him the Iraq exercise, point-by-contested slogan point.

  5. antillious says:

    Wouldn’t this be, “No war for France’s oil”?

    On the plus side, if the soldiers aren’t being paid, the leftists can’t call them mercinaries.

  6. Sinner says:

    Only if we send exclusively women, because as we all know the Republicans were sent to Washington DC to kill women.

  7. B. Moe says:

    Anybody hear what country club parking lot Sheehan has nailed her knees to?

  8. TmjUtah says:

    No war for OUR oil.

    Stay strong, Brazil. We’ve got your back!

Comments are closed.