Search






Jeff's Amazon.com Wish List

Archive Calendar

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Archives

"The 'Obamacare' Gordian knot"

As protein wisdom readers well know, the TEA Party caucus leadership in the House is at odds with the GOP leadership over the issue of CRs — specifically, CR agreements that leave in place the funding for ObamaCare the Democrats snuck into an authorization bill. One of the conservatives on the front lines of this battle with establishment Republican leadership has been Steve King, who today lays out his case — and so many of our cases — at Politico:

Obamacare is today’s Gordian knot. The law was drafted to be incredibly difficult for lawmakers to unravel. When then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), President Barack Obama, and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) drafted Obamacare, they quietly included provisions that automatically spend $105.5 billion over the next 10 years to implement the law. Annual congressional appropriations are the regular order of business, yet some automatic funding continues in perpetuity.

Unprecedented in scope, these self-enacting provisions grant Obamacare its own self-contained, automatic money machine. These are the resources that fertilize this malignant tumor, which is extending its roots into every aspect of our health care system. These roots are tightening their grip, despite the House’s vote to repeal it; the public’s opposition to it, and the decisions of two federal courts ruling it unconstitutional. These roots are the Obamacare Gordian knot.

I have proposed an Alexandrian solution to the complicated $105.5 billion problem of automatic Obamacare funding. During the continuing resolution debate on funding the federal government for FY 2011, I offered an amendment to cut off all automatic Obamacare funding.

House leaders would not agree to write my amendment into the bill, an act that would have protected my language from a point of order. The next course of action was to request that the Rules Committee protect my amendment from the same point of order — a request that was refused and led to a parliamentary ruling on the floor denying my amendment a vote.

Instead of boldly adopting the Alexandrian solution, House leadership and the Rules Committee sheathed the legislative sword that would have cut the Obamacare Gordian knot.

House Republicans then proceeded to add nine amendments, two of which were mine, to the continuing resolution — to prevent its funds from being used to further the implementation of Obamacare.

These amendments, however, could not touch Obamacare’s automatic spending provisions. As a result, the Obamacare knot remains securely tied — and $105.5 billion continues to stream into federal agencies to fund and build its framework.

Got that? King provided the GOP leadership every opportunity to attack the very funding that as we speak is working to set down the roots of a federal health care Leviathan that, once it takes up residence in our already existing bureaucratic morass will be nearly impossible to flush out and kill.

So why would the GOP leadership resist? Well, King tells us — and he doesn’t pull his punches:

Some members fear that a direct House challenge to Obamacare funding will lead to a government shutdown and Republicans would be blamed. Others believe a confrontation is futile — because if we passed a funding ban, the president would veto it anyway.

They should instead fear the wrath of the American people, to whom we pledged to repeal and defund Obamacare. The same American people who sent 87 freshmen Republicans to Congress — all pledged to pull Obamacare out by the roots.
Will the president shut down the government rather than watch his signature program starve for lack of funds? Would he hold all government functions hostage for a king’s ransom of $105.5 billion? Then so be it.

This battle will ultimately be decided in the court of public opinion. The best opinion poll taken was the Nov. 2 election. If the president refuses to sign a continuing resolution that provides for responsible funding of all government functions except Obamacare, Americans will know that serving them is not his priority. Preserving his signature socialized medicine plan is.

This is why Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) and I are circulating a letter to House members for language to be in the FY 11 CR that would shut off both the annual and the automatic appropriations for ObamaCare’s implementation. Our proposed language reads:

“Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of the funds made available by this or any previous Act with respect to any fiscal year may be used to carry out the provisions of Public Law 111-148, Public Law 111-152, or any amendment made by either such Public Law.”

This is the Alexandrian solution to cut the Obamacare Gordian knot.

More important, our letter contains a pledge to vote against any CR that lacks this language. We are asking every member of Congress who supports repealing and defunding Obamacare to sign this letter and take this pledge.

After all, the language we want added to the CR is the best solution to ensure that no additional money, regardless of its source, is expended on the discredited health-care law.

Call a GOP House member. Kicking the can down the road yet again is decidedly not the best way to rid ourselves of the legislation Obama is counting on doing the work of progressivism — expanding the federal government, centralizing power, magnifying the bureaucratic state — from here on out. In fact, he’s so confident that his job as a “transformational” figure is already done that he’s no longer even pretended to be bothered to do his job.

This is a king who is content that his reign has yielded transformative change, just he promised. That it wasn’t the change so many had hoped for ain’t his problem, frankly. He’s got parties to go to, concerts to attend, and celebrities to court.

You’ll just leave him be and let him eat his waffles now, you hear?

Congressional switchboard phone number: 202-224-3121

10 Replies to “"The 'Obamacare' Gordian knot"”

  1. proudvastrightwingconspirator says:

    “This is a king who is content that his reign has yielded transformative change, just he promised. That it wasn’t the change so many had hoped for ain’t his problem, frankly. He’s got parties to go to, concerts to attend, and celebrities to court.”

    Don’t forget the golf!

  2. Joe says:

    Calling this a tumor is an apt metaphor and it is about to go stage four.

  3. alppuccino says:

    With over 1000 waivers, was it really that good of an idea?

  4. Joe says:

    Funny how nuclear accidents make the media and politicans wet their pants. Lieberman is already calling for a moritorium on nuke plants (like they only take 20+ years to get through environmental approvals as it is so this is really a pressing problem). But when it comes to a known finacial disaster, even the opposition party does not seem to have any anxiety.

  5. JimK says:

    It needs a frickin’ Death Panel.

  6. dicentra says:

    Chaffetz is my man: I don’t gotta do nuthin’

    Also, tweeth badbanana “The earthquake shortened Earth’s day by 1.8 microseconds, so don’t expect me to get everything done this week.”

  7. ProfShade says:

    Gordian? Refering to my Boy Scout manual, I’d say it’s more of a Sheepshank or Carrick Bend Knot, either of which are appropriate for tieing the unsuspecting populace to gradually dmininshing yet more expensive medical care.

  8. Spiny Norman says:

    …once it takes up residence in our already existing bureaucratic morass will be nearly impossible to flush out and kill.

    Obamacare = bureaucratic kudzu.

  9. Pellegri says:

    Gordian? Refering to my Boy Scout manual, I’d say it’s more of a Sheepshank or Carrick Bend Knot, either of which are appropriate for tieing the unsuspecting populace to gradually dmininshing yet more expensive medical care.

    No no, like Nematomorpha. That kind of Gordian.

    (Terrible, gut-crawling–literally!–horror warning. Not a lot worse than actually getting up to face this sort of tomfoolery in our government, though. Just more visceral.

    …Don’t click if you like crickets.)

  10. Rupert says:

    For those of you that remembered playing “kick the can”, I can’t help but remember the penalty for falsely kicking the can. The person who was dumb enough to illegally engage in a false kick was picked up and thrown into the local sticker-bush. It’s in the constitution – look it up!!!

Comments are closed.