Ya know, as I was loading up the cattle cars full of moveon.org members I too wondered, are we headed towards Nazi Germany? So should we like, get it over with and invade Canada already?
Every day that goes by, these guys get more and more comfortable with the whole Bush=Hitler thing. And it’s no longer merely on placards held by giant puppets, WRITTEN IN THE BLOOD OF THE INNOCENTS.
Anyway, the most noteworthy line in that whole editorial was “…here in Berlin…”.
In other words, he’s pulling a Lars von Trier: I haven’t been to America, but I know everything I need to know about it.
Here’s another one: “He is not another Hitler. Yet there is a certain parallelism.”
Translated: I’m not comfortable calling him Hitler 2: The Quickening, but he totally is!
His entire argument is built on the 2 trends combined in Bush. CALVINIST righteousness and patriotic fervor. Bush is Methodist. On his way west perhaps he might think about learning something of the doctrinal differences between denominations.
Ya know, as I was loading up the cattle cars full of moveon.org members I too wondered, are we headed towards Nazi Germany? So should we like, get it over with and invade Canada already?
Or was winning the cup again enough torture?
Gosh it’s hard to be a dictatorship..
So, did the DH* rule come into play right after WWII? Who was the first DH?
*Designated Hitler = leading Republican
Invade Canada? With all this Chirac-bashing to set the mood, why should we even be Germany if we can’t invade France?
Every day that goes by, these guys get more and more comfortable with the whole Bush=Hitler thing. And it’s no longer merely on placards held by giant puppets, WRITTEN IN THE BLOOD OF THE INNOCENTS.
Anyway, the most noteworthy line in that whole editorial was “…here in Berlin…”.
In other words, he’s pulling a Lars von Trier: I haven’t been to America, but I know everything I need to know about it.
Here’s another one: “He is not another Hitler. Yet there is a certain parallelism.”
Translated: I’m not comfortable calling him Hitler 2: The Quickening, but he totally is!
Baldilocks has found the first evidence that they may not be wrong about Bush being Hitler; I linked it here
I hope Richard John Neuhaus and the conservative Catholic gang at http://www.firstthings.com get hold of Greeley for this.
Gee…thanks for pointing that out you arrogant cartoonishly bad soft porn/melodramatic author.
I was unclear…for a moment.
Geez, Triticale! You should warn a person before linking to a picture such as that!
His entire argument is built on the 2 trends combined in Bush. CALVINIST righteousness and patriotic fervor. Bush is Methodist. On his way west perhaps he might think about learning something of the doctrinal differences between denominations.