…The New York Times evidently forgot to add, “no more baldfaced lying” to their own list of New Year’s determinations.
Not that I expected otherwise. Just like pointing it out, is all.
(Or, you know: linking to someone who has pointed it out. Tomato, tomahto.)
Even if they resolved “no more baldfaced lying,” how long do you think they could have stuck to it? Is there even a unit of time that small?
Like, a nano-jiffy?
I could repeat what we already know, that it simply has to be the fault of the bad, bad Republicans when the Democrats can’t get anything passed (even if they never actually, you know, tried), because, after all, anything the Democrats want is for the good of all, and simply everyone who isn’t an evil Republican must be in favor of what they want, but that would not further enlighten any of us. Therefore, I won’t do that.
Actually, my late, sainted mother used to pronounce it tomar-to. She was from down east Maine, which explains it.
Thanks for the link; it’s not like I was fishing for it or anything. :)
Now, Jeff, if they’d made that resolution all they would have had is 100 blank pages…..