“What does it take to get liberals sounding like Ayn Rand in defense of property rights? Having their own property threatened.” So writes Brian Doherty in “My Own Private Malibu” — a piece that finds Doherty’s libertarianism defending some super rich activist Democrats on principle:
[…] Sure, there’s something unprincipled about people who in their public lives enthusiastically support environmental and political causes that frequently value state power over property rights suddenly screaming, ‘This land is my land.’ But Mr. Geffen and his neighbors have a good case. Property owners should hang together on principle. If not, we will all find the government ordering us to let people cut across our land — whether actually or metaphorically — to serve some sort of presumed public good.
[Related: Here’s the backstory — “Malibu’s rich and famous fight to keep beach private” (from USA Today) — and a hypothetical question I posed to libertarians in early May re: private property rights.
update: Sneaking Suspicions’ Fritz Schranck — a government attorney living along the coast of Delaware (I used to live just down the road, in Ocean City, MD) — had some interesting legal analysis relating to cases such as these back in March.]

Here’s the cite to my post about this issue in March:
http://sneakingsuspicions.com/a0310162002.htm#031202
Thought you’d like to see it, if you hadn’t already.
BR,
Fritz/f
They do have one major problem here–during Clinton’s demented orgy of last-minute pardons and presidential orders as he exited the White House, he made the entire coastline of Califronia into a National Monument. This is still working its way through the system he clogged up with his frantic attempt to create a “legacy,” but it’s out there, and National Monument status is a “untouchable” as it gets.